Budgeting, Performance Evaluation, and Compensation: A Performance Management Model

Advances in Management Accounting

Volumn 15, Issue , 2006, Pages 51-79

  Bento, Al ^a   White, Lourdes Ferreira ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646828338     PISSN: 14747871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-7871(06)15003-0     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) & Maisel, L. (2001). Performance measurement practices survey results. Jersey City, NJ: AICPA.
2. Anthony R. Planning and control systems: A framework for analysis (1965), Harvard University Press, Boston, MA
3. Antle R., and Smith A. An empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation of corporate executives. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (1986) 1-39
4. Argyris C. The impact of budgets on people (1952), Controllership Foundation, New York, NY
5. Bannister J., and Newman H. Analysis of corporate disclosures on relative performance evaluation. Accounting Horizons 17 3 (2003) 235-246
6. Bento R., and White L. Participant values and incentive plans. Human Resource Management Journal 37 Spring (1998) 47-59
7. Blalock H. Social statistics. 2nd ed. (1979), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY 461-477
8. Brownell P. The role of accounting data in performance evaluation, budgetary participation and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Accounting Research 20 (1982) 12-27
9. Brownell P., and Dunk A. Task uncertainty and its interaction with budgetary participation and budget emphasis: Some methodological issues and empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16 8 (1991) 693-703
10. Brownell P., and Hirst M. Reliance on accounting information, budgetary participation and task uncertainty: Tests of a three-way interaction. Journal of Accounting Research 24 2 (1986) 241-249
11. Bruns W., and Merchant K. Ethics test for everyday managers. Harvard Business Review 67 March-April (1989) 220-221
12. Bruns W., and Merchant K. The dangerous morality of managing earnings. Management Accounting 72 August (1990) 22-25
13. Bruns W., and Waterhouse J. Budget control and organizational structure. Journal of Accounting Research 13 2 (1975) 177-203
14. Cammann C. Effects of the use of control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1 4 (1976) 301-313
15. Chong V., and Chong K. Budget goal commitment and informational effects of budget participation on performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Behavioral Research in Accounting 14 (2002) 65-86
16. Chow C. The effects of job standard tightness and compensation scheme on performance: An exploration of linkages. The Accounting Review 58 (1983) 667-685
17. Chow, C., Shields, M., & Wu, A. (1993). National culture and the transfer of management control systems across national boundaries. Presented at the Accounting, Behavior and Organizations Section conference of the American Accounting Association, January 1994.
18. Chow C., Shields M., and Wu A. The importance of national culture in the design of and preference for management controls for multi-national operations. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 (1999) 441-461
19. Clinton D., and Hunton J. Linking participative budgeting congruence to organization performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 13 (2001) 127-141
20. Collins F. The interaction of budget characteristics and personality variables with budgetary response attitudes. The Accounting Review 53 (1978) 324-335
21. Covaleski M., Evans J., Luft J., and Shields M. Three theoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration. Journal of Management Accounting Research 15 (2003) 3-49
22. Demski J. Uncertainty and evaluation based on controllable performance. Journal of Accounting Research 14 (1976) 230-245
23. Dermer J. The interrelationship of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Academy of Management Journal 18 (1975) 125-129
24. Dunk A., and Nouri H. Antecedents of budgetary slack: A literature review and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature 17 (1998) 72-97
25. El-Shishini, H. (2001). An empirical investigation of the application of the controllability principle and divisional performance measurement in UK companies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Huddersfield, 2001.
26. Epstein M.J., Kumar P., and Westbrook R.A. The drivers of customer and corporate profitability: Modeling, measuring, and managing the causal relationships. Advances in Management Accounting 9 (2000) 43-72
27. Fisher J., Frederickson J., and Peffer S. Budgeting: An experimental investigation of the effects of negotiation. The Accounting Review 75 (2000) 95-114
28. Gibbons R., and Murphy K. Relative performance evaluation for chief executive officers. In: Enrenberg R. (Ed). Do compensation policies matter? (1990), ILR Press, Ithaca, NY
29. Hackman J., and Porter L. Expectancy theory predictions of work effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 3 (1968) 417-426
30. Hansen S., Otley D., and Van der Stede W. Practice developments in budgeting: An overview and research perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research 15 (2003) 49-70
31. Hartmann F. The appropriateness of RAPM: Toward the further development of theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 4-5 (2000) 451-482
32. Hemmer T. On the design and choice of "modern" management accounting measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 8 (1996) 87-116
33. Hirst M. Reliance on accounting performance measures, uncertainty, and dysfunctional behavior: Some extensions. Journal of Accounting Research 21 (1983) 596-605
34. Hopwood A. An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research 10 (1972) 156-182
35. Ittner C., and Larcker D. Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10 (1998) 205-238
36. Ittner C., and Larcker D. Are non-financial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research 36 Supplement (1998) 1-35
37. Jensen M. Paying people to lie: The truth about the budgeting process. European Financial Management 9 3 (2003) 379-406
38. Kaplan R., and Norton D. The Balanced Scorecard (1996), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
39. Kennis I. Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance. The Accounting Review 54 (1979) 707-721
40. Kleingeld A., Tuijl H., and Algera J. Participation in the design of performance management systems: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior 25 (2004) 831
41. Kren L. Budgetary participation and managerial performance: The impact of information and environmental volatility. The Accounting Review 67 (1992) 511-526
42. Lal M., Dunk A., and Smith G. The propensity of managers to create budgetary slack: A cross-national re-examination using random sampling. The International Journal of Accounting 31 (1996) 483-496
43. Lawson R., Stratton W., and Hatch T. The importance of true balance. CMA Management 77 December-January (2004) 36-39
44. Little H., Magner N., and Welker R. The fairness of formal budgetary procedures and their enactment: Relationships with managers' behavior. Group & Organization Management 27 (2002) 209-225
45. Maher M. The use of relative performance evaluation in organizations. In: Bruns W. (Ed). Accounting and management: Field study perspectives (1987), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA 295-315
46. Mahoney T., Jerdee T., and Carroll S. Development of managerial performance: A research approach (1963), South-Western Publishing Company, Cincinnati, OH
47. Merchant K. The design of the corporate budgeting system: Influences on managerial behavior and performance. The Accounting Review 56 (1981) 813-829
48. Merchant K. Budgeting and the propensity to create budget slack. Accounting, Organizations and Society 10 (1985) 201-210
49. Merchant K. How and why firms disregard the controllability principle. In: Bruns W. (Ed). Accounting & management: Field study perspectives (1987), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA 316-338
50. Merchant K. Rewarding results: Motivating profit center managers (1989), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
51. Merchant K., and Manzoni J. The achievability of budget targets in profit centers: A field study. The Accounting Review 64 (1989) 539-558
52. Merchant K., and Rockness J. The ethics of managing earnings: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 13 (1994) 79-94
53. Merchant K., and Van der Stede W. Management control systems (2003), Pearson Education, Prentice Hall-Financial Times, Harlow, England
54. Milani K. Budget-setting, performance and attitudes. The Accounting Review 50 (1975) 274-284
55. Nouri H., Blau G., and Shahid A. The effect of socially desirable responding (SDR) on the relation between budgetary participation and self-reported job performance. Advances in Management Accounting 4 (1995) 163-177
56. Nouri H., and Parker P. The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (1998) 467-483
57. Onsi M. Factor analysis of behavioral variables affecting budgetary slack. The Accounting Review 48 (1973) 535-548
58. Otley D. Budget use and managerial performance. Journal of Accounting Research 16 (1978) 122-149
59. Perrow C. Organizational analysis: A sociological approach (1970), Wadsworth, Belmont, CA
60. Said A., HassabElnaby H., and Wier B. An empirical investigation of the performance consequences of non-financial measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 15 (2003) 193-224
61. Shields M., Chow C., and Whittington R. The effects of state risk and controllability filters on compensation contract and effort choice. Abacus 25 (1989) 39-55
62. Shields M., Deng F., and Kato Y. The design and effects of control systems: Tests of direct- and indirect-effects models. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 (2000) 185-202
63. Shields J., and Shields M. Antecedents of participative budgeting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (1998) 49-76
64. Shields J., and White L. The measurement gap in paying for performance: Actual and preferred measures. Advances in Management Accounting 12 (2004) 59-84
65. Shields M., and Young S.M. Antecedents and consequences of participative budgeting: Evidence on the effects of asymmetrical information. Journal of Management Accounting Research 5 (1993) 265-280
66. Simons R. Analysis of the organizational characteristics related to tight budget goals. Contemporary Accounting Research 5 1 (1988) 267-283
67. Solomons D. Divisional performance: Measurement and control (1965), Dow-Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL
68. Van de Ven A., and Delbecq A. A task contingent model of work-unit structure. Administrative Science Quarterly 19 (1974) 183-197
69. Waller W., and Chow C. The self-selection and effort effects of standard-based employment contracts: A framework and some empirical evidence. The Accounting Review 60 (1985) 458-476
70. Wentzel K. The influence of fairness perceptions and goal commitment on managers' performance in a budget setting. Behavioral Research in Accounting 14 (2002) 247-271
71. Young S.M. Participative budgeting: The effects of risk aversion and asymmetric information on budgetary slack. Journal of Accounting Research 23 (1985) 829-842