CHAOS - A model of the Earth's magnetic field derived from CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC-C magnetic satellite data

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-75

  Olsen, Nils ^a   Lühr, Hermann ^b   Sabaka, Terence J ^c   Mandea, Mioara ^b   Rother, Martin ^b   Tøffner Clausen, Lars ^a   Choi, Sungchan ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^c NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Earth's magnetic field; Geomagnetic secular variation; Geomagnetism; Lithosphere; Satellite; Spherical harmonics

Indexed keywords

EULERIAN ANALYSIS; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; GEOMAGNETISM; MAGNETOMETER; MODELING; SATELLITE DATA; SPHERICAL HARMONICS;

EID: 33646816489     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02959.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bloxham, J. & Jackson, A., 1992. Time-dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core-mantle boundary, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 19 537-19 563.
2. De Boor, C., 2001. A practical guide to splines, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 27.
3. ESA, 1997. The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues, ESA SP-1200.
4. Feldstein, Y.I. & Starkov, G.V., 1970. The auroral oval and the boundary of closed field lines of geomagnetic field, Planet. Space Science, 18, 501-508.
5. Holme, R., 2000. Modelling of attitude error in vector magnetic data: application to Ørsted data, Earth, Planets and Space, 52, 1187-1197.
6. Holme, R. & Bloxham, J., 1996. The treatment of attitude errors in satellite geomagnetic data, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 98, 221-233.
7. Holme, R. & Olsen, N., 2006. Core-surface flow modelling from high resolution secular variation, Geoph. J. Int., in review.
8. Holme, R., Olsen, N., Rother, M. & Lühr, H., 2003. CO2: A CHAMP magnetic field model, in First CHAMP Mission results for Gravity, Magnetic and Atmospheric Studies, eds Reigber, C., Lühr, H. & Schwintzer, P., p. 220-225, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
9. Hulot, G. & Le Mouël, J.L., 1994. A statistical approach to the Earth's main magnetic field, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 82, 167-183.
10. Kan, J.R. & Lee, L.C., 1979. Energy coupling function and solar wind-magnetosphere dynamo, Geophys. Res. Lett., 6, 577-580.
11. Kivelson, M.G. & Russell, C.T., 1995. Introduction to Space Physics, Cambridge University Press.
12. Langel, R.A. & Estes, R.H., 1985. The near-Earth magnetic field at 1980 determined from MAGSAT data, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 2495-2509.
13. Langel, R.A. & Hinze, W.J., 1998. The Magnetic Field of the Earth's Lithosphere: The Satellite Perspective, Cambridge University Press.
14. Langel, R.A., Ridgway, J.R., Sugiura, M. & Maezawa, K., 1988. The geomagnetic field at 1982 from DE-2 and other magnetic field data, Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 40, 1103-1127.
15. Langlais, B., Mandea, M. & Ultré-Guérard, P., 2003. High-resolution magnetic field modeling: Application to MAGSAT and Ørsted data, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 135, 77-91.
16. Lesur, V., Macmillan, S. & Thomson, A., 2005. A magnetic field model with daily variations of the magnetospheric field and its induced counterpart in 2001, Geophys. J. Int., 160, 79-88.
17. Lühr, H., Rother, M., Maus, S., Mai, W. & Cooke, D., 2003. The diamagnetic effect of the equatorial appleton anomaly: Its characteristics and impact on geomagnetic field modelling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, doi:10.1029/2003GL017407
18. Maus, S. & Lühr, H., 2005. Signature of the quiet-time magnetospheric magnetic field and its electromagnetic induction in the rotating Earth, Geophys. J. Int., 162, 755-763.
19. Maus, S. & Weidelt, P., 2004. Separating the magnetospheric disturbance magnetic field into external and transient internal contributions using a 1D conductivity model of the Earth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L12,614, doi:10.1029/2004GL020, 232.
20. Maus, S., McLean, S., Dater, D., Lühr, H., Rother, M., Mai, W. & Choi, S., 2005. NGDC/GFZ candidate models for the 10th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field, Earth, Planets and Space, 57, 1151-1156.
21. Maus, S., Rother, M., Hemant, K., Stolle, C., Lühr, H., Kuvshinov, A.V. & Olsen, N., 2006. Earth's crustal magnetic field determined to spherical harmonic degree 90 from CHAMP satellite measurements, Geophys. J. Int., doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02833.x.
22. Olsen, N., 2002. A model of the geomagnetic field and its secular variation for epoch 2000 estimated from Ørsted data, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 454-462.
23. Olsen, N. et al., 2000. Ørsted initial field model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3607-3610.
24. Olsen, N. et al., 2003. Calibration of the Ørsted vector magnetometer, Earth, Planets and Space, 55, 11-18.
25. Olsen, N., Sabaka, T.J. & Lowes, F., 2005. New parameterization of external and induced fields in geomagnetic field modeling, and a candidate model for IGRF 2005, Earth, Planets and Space, 57, 1141-1149.
26. Ritter, P., Lühr, H., Maus, S. & Viljanen, A., 2004. High latiutude ionospheric currents during very quiet times: Their characteristics and predictabilities, Ann. Geophys., 22, 2001-2014.
27. Sabaka, T.J. & Olsen, N., 2005. Enhancing comprehensive inversions using the Swarm constellation, Earth, Planets and Space, in press.
28. Sabaka, T.J., Olsen, N. & Purucker, M., 2004. Extending comprehensive models of the Earth's magnetic field with Ørsted and CHAMP data, Geophys. J. Int., 159, 521-547, doi: 10.1111/ j.1365-246X.2004.02,421.x.
29. Schumaker, L.L., 1981. Spline Functions: Basic Theory, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
30. Seeber, G., 2004. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin - New York.
31. Stacey, F.D., 1992. Physics of the Earth, Brookfield Press, Kenmore, Australia.