A new look at the "Asian disease" problem: A choice between the best possible outcomes or between the worst possible outcomes?

Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 129-143

  Li, Shu ^a   Xie, Xiaofei ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646809720     PISSN: 13546783     EISSN: 14640708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13546780500145652     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arrow, K. J. (1982). Risk perception in psychology and economics. Economic Inquiry, 20, 1 -9.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator - mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Bohm, P., & Lind, H. (1992). A note on the robustness of a classical framing result. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 355-361.
4. Chiu, Y. C. (2003). Is there a framing effect? The asset effect in decision-making under risk. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45, 171-182.
5. Christensen, C., Heckerling, P., Mackesy, M. E., Bernstein, L. M., & Elstein, A. S. (1995). Pervasiveness of framing effects in clinical decision making. Journal of Behavioural Decision Makings, 169-180.
6. Elliott, C. S., & Archibald, R. B. (1989). Subjective framing and attitudes toward risk. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10, 321-328.
7. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1990). The effect of framing on choice: Interactions with risk-taking propensity, cognitive style, and sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 496-510.
8. Fox, S., & Dayan, K. (2004) Framing and risky choice as influenced by comparison of one's achievements with others: The case of investment in the stock exchange. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 301-321.
9. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
10. Kahneman, D.. & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 136-142.
11. Kühberger, A. (1995). The framing of decisions: A new look at old problems. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 62, 230-240.
12. Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55.
13. Lee, W. (1971). Decision theory and human behaviour. New York: Wiley.
14. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
15. Li, S. (1995). Is there a decision weight π? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 27, 453-463.
16. Li, S. (1996). What is the price for utilizing deductive reasoning? A reply to generalised expectation maximizers. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 29, 355-358.
17. Li, S. (1998). Can the conditions governing the framing effect be determined? Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 133-153.
18. Li, S. (2001). Extended research on dominance violations in similarity judgments: The equate-to-differentiate interpretation. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 11, 13-38.
19. Li, S. (2003). Violations of conjoint independence in binary choices: The equate-to-differentiate interpretation. European Journal of Operational Research, 148, 65-79.
20. Li, S. (2004a). A behavioural choice model when computational ability matters. Applied Intelligence, 20, 147-163.
21. Li, S. (2004b). Equate-to-differentiate approach: An application in binary choice under uncertainty. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 12(3), 269-295.
22. Li, S., & Adams, A. S. (1995). Is there something more important behind framing? Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 62, 216-219.
23. Li, S., Fang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2000). What makes frames work? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32, 229-234.
24. Mandel, D. R. (2001). Gain loss framing and choice: Separating outcome formulations from descriptor formulations. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 85, 56-76.
25. McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259-1262.
26. Montgomery, H. (1977). A study of intransitive preferences using a think aloud procedure. In H. Jungermann & G. de Zeeuw (Eds.), Decision making and change in human affairs (pp. 347-362). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
27. Ranyard, R. (1982). Binary choice patterns and reasons given for simple risky choice. Acta Psychologica, 52, 125-135.
28. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1-75.
29. Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behaviour: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin. 121, 3-19.
30. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
31. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
32. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
33. von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.