A comparison of event-related potentials of humans and rats elicited by a serial feature-positive discrimination task

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 269-288

  Sambeth, A ^a,b   Maes, J H R ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Auditory event related potential; Discrimination task; Human; N2; Occasion setting; P3; Rat

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646766128     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baeyens F., Vervliet B., Vansteenwegen D., Beckers T., Hermans D., and Eelen P. Simultaneous and sequential feature negative discriminations: Elemental learning and occasion setting in human Pavlovian conditioning. Learning and Motivation 35 (2004) 136-166
2. Bokura H., Yamaguchi S., and Kobayashi S. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clinical Neurophysiology 112 (2001) 2224-2232
3. Bourbon W.T., Will K.W., Gary H.E., and Papanicolaou A.C. Habituation of auditory event-related potentials: A comparison of self-initiated and automated stimulus trains. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 66 (1987) 160-166
4. Bouton M.E., and Nelson J.B. Mechanisms of feature-positive and feature-negative discrimination learning in an appetitive conditioning paradigm. In: Schmajuk N.A., and Holland P.C. (Eds). Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals (1998), American Psychological Association, Washington
5. Brankačk J., Seidenbecher T., and Müller-Gärtner H.-W. Task-relevant late positive component in rats: Is it related to hippocampal theta rhythm?. Hippocampus 6 (1996) 475-482
6. Bruin K.J., and Wijers A.A. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: A comparative event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology 113 (2002) 1172-1182
7. Bruin K.J., Kenemans J.L., Verbaten M.N., and Van der Heijden A.H.C. Habituation: An event-related potential and dipole source analysis study. International Journal of Psychophysiology 36 (2000) 199-209
8. De Bruin N.M.W.J., Ellenbroek B.A., Van Schaijk W.J., Cools A.R., Coenen A.M.L., and Van Luijtelaar E.L.J.M. Sensory gating of auditory evoked potentials in rats: Effects of repetitive stimulation and the interstimulus interval. Biological Psychology 55 (2001) 195-213
9. Dibbets P., Maes J.H.R., and Vossen J.M.H. Interaction between positional but not between non-positional cues in human predictive learning. Behavioural Processes 50 (2000) 65-78
10. Dibbets P., Maes J.H.R., and Vossen J.M.H. Serial and simultaneous feature positive discriminations in a human Skinner box. Behavioral Processes 59 (2002) 1-14
11. Donchin E. Surprise! ... Surprise?. Psychophysiology 18 (1981) 493-513
12. Donkers F.C.L., and Van Boxtel G.J.M. The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition 56 (2004) 165-176
13. Ehlers C.L., Kaneko W.M., Robledo P., and Lopez A.L. Long-latency event-related potentials in rats: Effects of task and stimulus parameters. Neuroscience 62 (1994) 759-769
14. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/NoGo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica 101 (1999) 267-291
15. Galicia O., Sánchez-Alavez M., Díaz-Ruíz O., Sánchez Narváez F., Elder J.H., and Navarro L. HIV-derived protein gp120 suppresses P3 potential in rats: Potential implications in HIV-associated dementia. Cognitive Neuroscience 11 (2000) 1351-1355
16. Gonsalvez C.J., Gordon E., Grayson S., Barry R.J., Lazzaro I., and Bahramali H. Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude?. Psychophysiology 36 (1999) 643-654
17. Hall G. Associative structures in pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. In: Pashler H.E., and Gallistel R. (Eds). Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Learning, motivation, and emotion (2002), Wiley, New York 1-45
18. Hardwick S.A., and Lipp O.V. Modulation of affective learning: An occasion for evaluative conditioning?. Learning and Motivation 31 (2000) 251-271
19. Holland P.C. Occasion setting and pavlovian conditioning. In: Medin D. (Ed). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 3rd ed. (1992), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 69-125
20. Holland P.C. Relations between Pavlovian-Instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 30 (2004) 104-117
21. Hurlbut B.J., Lubar J.F., and Satterfield S.M. Auditory elicitation of the P300 event-related evoked potential in the rat. Physiology and Behavior 39 (1987) 483-487
22. Johnson Jr. R. A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology 23 (1986) 367-383
23. Katayama J., and Polich J. P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 100 (1996) 555-562
24. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 557-577
25. Meeren H.K.M., Van Cappellen vanWalsum A.M., Van Luijtelaar E.L.J.M., and Coenen A.M.L. Auditory evoked potentials from auditory cortex, medial geniculate nucleus, and inferior colliculus during sleep-wake states and spike-wave discharges in the WAG/Rij Rat. Brain Research 898 (2001) 321-331
26. Nelson J.B., and Bouton M.E. The effects of a context switch following serial and simultaneous feature-negative discriminations. Learning and Motivation 28 (1997) 56-84
27. Ochoa C.J., and Polich J. P300 and blink instructions. Clinical Neurophysiology 111 (2000) 93-98
28. Paxinos G., and Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates (1998), Academic Press, San Diego
29. Polich J., Ellerson P.C., and Cohen J. P300, stimulus intensity, modality, and probability. International Journal of Psychophysiology 23 (1996) 55-62
30. Quian Quiroga R., and Van Luijtelaar E.L.J.M. Habituation and sensitization in rat auditory evoked potentials: A single-trial analysis with wavelet denoising. International Journal of Psychophysiology 43 (2002) 141-153
31. Ravden D., and Polich J. On P300 measurement stability: Habituation, intra-trial block variation, and ultradian rhythms. Biological Psychology 51 (1999) 59-76
32. Sambeth A., Brankačk J., and Maes J.H.R. With long intervals, inter-stimulus interval is the critical determinant of the human P300 amplitude. Neuroscience Letters 359 (2004) 143-146
33. Sambeth A., Maes J.H.R., Quian Quiroga R., and Coenen A.M.L. Effects of stimulus repetitions on the event-related potential of humans and rats. International Journal of Psychophysiology 53 (2004) 197-205
34. Sambeth A., Maes J.H.R., Quian Quiroga R., Van Rijn C.M., and Coenen A.M.L. Enhanced re-habituation of the orienting response of the human event-related potential. Neuroscience Letters 356 (2004) 103-106
35. Sambeth A., Maes J.H.R., Van Luijtelaar G., Molenkamp I.B.S., Jongsma M.L.A., and Van Rijn C.M. Auditory event-related potentials in humans and rats: Effects of task manipulation. Psychophysiology 40 (2003) 60-68
36. Shinba T. Event-related potentials of the rat during active and passive auditory oddball paradigms. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 104 (1997) 447-452
37. Shinba T. Neuronal firing activity in the dorsal hippocampus during the auditory discrimination oddball task in awake rats: Relation to event-related potential generation. Cognitive Brain Research 8 (1999) 241-250
38. Swartzentruber D. Modulatory mechanisms in Pavlovian conditioning. Animal Learning and Behavior 23 (1995) 123-143
39. Talnov A.M., Quian Quiroga R., Meier M., Matsumoto G., and Brankačk J. Entorhinal inputs to dentate gyrus are activated mainly by conditioned events with long time intervals. Hippocampus 13 (2003) 755-765
40. Tekok-Kilic A., Shucard J.L., and Shucard D.W. Stimulus modality and Go/NoGo effects on P3 during parallel visual and auditory continuous performance tasks. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 578-589
41. Yamaguchi S., Globus H., and Knight R.T. P3-like potential in rats. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 88 (1993) 151-154
42. Zang X., Wang Y., Li S., and Wang L. Event-related potential N270, a negative component to identification of conflict monitoring following memory retrieval. Clinical Neurophysiology 114 (2003) 2461-2468