Full threshold vs. (SITA) in glaucomatous patients undergoing automated perimetry for the first time;Full threshold vs. Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA) em pacientes glaucomatosos submetidos à perimetria computadorizada pela primeira vez

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 145-150

  Schimiti, Rui Barroso ^a,b,c   Arciery, Enyr Saran ^a   Avelino, Rodrigo Rezende ^a   Matsuo, Tiemi ^d   Costa, Vital Paulino ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b Hospital de Olhos de Londrina   (Brazil)

^c UNICAMP ^*  (Brazil)

^d STATE UNIVERSITY OF LONDRINA   (Brazil)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Perimetry methods; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PROBABILITY; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SWEDEN; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

EID: 33646756493     PISSN: 00042749     EISSN: 16782925     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492006000200002     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. a ed. St Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1999.
2. Costa VP. Perimetria computadorizada: um guia básico de interpretação. 2a ed. São Paulo: RioMed; 2000.
3. Shirato S, Inoue R, Fukushima K, Suzuki Y. Clinical evaluation of SITA: a new family of parimetric testing strategies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237(l):29-34.
4. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998; 76(3):268-72.
5. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast Strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(8):2654-9.
6. Sharma AK, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Mohsin M. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies. J Glaucoma. 2000;9(l):20-7.
7. Schimiti RB, Costa VP. Perimetria computadorizada. Humphrey. In: Yamane R. Semiologia ocular. 2a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Cultura Médica; 2003. p.289-300.
8. Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA, Cunliffe IA. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(6):1152-61.
9. Sekhar GC, Naduvilath TJ, Lakkai M, Jayakumar AJ, Pandi GT, Mandal AK, Honavar SG. Sensitivity of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(7):1303-8.
10. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(6):1052-8.
11. Cbylack LT Jr., Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(6):831-6.
12. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(9):1136-41.
13. Wild JM, Pacey IE, O'Neill EC, Cunliffe IA. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithm in glaucoma. Invest Oplithalmol Vis Sci. 1999;4O(9):1998-2009.
14. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77(2):125-9.
15. Yenice O, Temel A. Evaluation of two Humphrey perimetry programs: full threshold and SITA standard testing strategy for learning effect. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15(2):209-12.
16. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;14(l):19-22.
17. Schimiti RB, Avelino RR, Kara-José N, Costa VP. Full-threshold versus Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) in normal individuals undergoing automated perimetry for the first time. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(11): 2084-92; discussion 2092.
18. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77(2):143-6.
19. Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer morphology. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82(9):986.