Working on educational research methods with masters students in an international online learning community

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 577-603

  Hudson, Brian ^a,b,c   Owen, David ^a   Van Veen, Klaas ^d,e  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Interactive Media ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e HAN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH; ONLINE LEARNING; PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH; RESEARCH FRAMEWORK;

INTERNET; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; RESEARCH; STUDENTS;

EDUCATION;

EID: 33646728694     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00553.x     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Bielaczyc, K. (2001). Designing social infrastructure: the challenge of building computer-supported learning communities. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. The proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 106-114). Maastricht: University of Maastricht.
2. Brown, A. & Dowling, P. (1998). Doing research/reading research: a mode of interrogation for education. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
3. Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: a historical and conceptual perspective. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition (pp. 21-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Buchberger, F. (2001). Active learning in powerful learning environments. In F. Buchberger & S. Berghammer (Eds), Active learning in teacher education (pp. 7-18). Linz: Universitätsverlag Rudolf Trauner.
5. Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research, London: Falmer Press.
6. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
7. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
8. Grabinger, R. S. (1996). Rich environments for active learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology (pp. 665-692). New York: Macmillan.
9. Hudson, B. (2000). A social perspective on teaching and learning in the context of Computer Mediated Communication in teacher education. Journal of Information Technology in Teacher Education, 8, 3, 345-356.
10. Hudson, B. (2005a). Research-based practice: on the relationship between action research and design research in the context of the development of an international on-line MSc programme. LERU invitation seminar on research-based teaching in HE. League of European Research-Intensive Universities, University of Helsinki, March 22-23, 2005, pp. 37-39.
11. Hudson, B. (2005b, October). Networking as/for knowledge transformation and innovation: from research-based practice to the scholarship of teaching. Paper presented at the October 14-16, 2005 Conference of the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vancouver, British Columbia.
12. Hudson, B., EI-Gamal, A., Gouda, A., Knutsen, E., Ruotsalainen, M., Peltonen, A. et al. (2000, November). A European learning environment: reflections on teaching and learning in a multinational virtual learning community. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education/International Conference on Computer Assisted Instruction, Taipei, Taiwan.
13. Hudson, B., Hudson, A. & Steel, J. (2006). Orchestrating interdependence in a multinational virtual learning community. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00552.x.
14. Kemmis, S. (1993). Action research and social movement: a challenge for policy research. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 1, 1. Retrieved 17/07/05, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/vlnl.html.
15. Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1982). The action research planmr. Victoria, Australia: Deakin.
16. Kerlinger, F. N. (1970). Foundations of behavioral research. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
17. Kirschner, P. (2001). Using integrated electronic environments for collaborative teaching/learning. Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, 2, 1-9.
18. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3, 3, 149-164.
20. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lee, A. (1999). Infomedia literacy: an educational basic for young people in the new information age. Information, Communication and Society, 2, 2, 134-155.
22. Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikaianen, M. & Muukkonen, M. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: a review of research and development. The J.H.G.I. Giesbers Reports on Education, 10. Netherlands: University of Nijmegen, Department of Educational Sciences.
23. Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: a challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 2,133-150.
24. Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the Computer-supported Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference (pp. 72-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Lowyck, J. (2002), Teaching methods, knowledge, technology and assessment: an interlinked field? Paper presented at The Tuning Project, line 4: Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. [WWW document] Retrieved 17/07/05, from http://www.reIint.deusto.es/TuningProject/index.htm.
26. Mason, R. & Weller, M. (2000). Factors affecting students' satisfaction on a web course. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16, 2, 173-200.
27. Mouly, G. J. (1978). Educational research: The art and science of investigation. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
28. Newman, F. & Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: revolutionary scientist, London: Routledge.
29. Owen, D., Hudson, B. & Tervola, T. (2005). Learning in, about and with open and flexible learning environments: an evaluation of student and tutor experiences in a European learning community. Technology, Pedagogy and Education (in press).
30. Salomon, G. (1992). What does the design of effective CSCL require and how do we study its effects? Proceedings of Spring '92 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 21, 3. New York: ACM Press.
31. Salomon, G. (1996). Studying novel learning environments as patterns of change. In S. Vosniadiou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser & H. Mandl (Eds), International perspectives on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments (pp. 363-377). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York.
34. Stake, R. (1973, October). Program evaluation particularly responsive evaluation. Occasional Paper No. 5 presented at the Conference on New Trends in Evaluation, Goteborg, Sweden.
35. Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: developing professional judgement. London: Routledge.
36. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
37. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Wertsch, J. V. (1994). Mediated action in socio-cultural studies. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1, 202-208.