Assessment centers in Belgium: The results of a study on their validity and fairness;Les centres d'évaluation en Belgique: Résultats d'une étude sur leur validité et équité

Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 25-33

  Lievens, Filip ^a   Van Keer, Etienne ^a   De Witte, ^a   Morel, ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Assessment Center; Fairness; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646704195     PISSN: 14202530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pto.2005.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Arthur Jr., W., Day, E.A., McNelly, T.L., Edens, P.S., 2003. A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology 56, 125-154.
2. Baron, H., Janman, K., 1996. Fairness in the assessment centre. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 11, 61-114.
3. Gaugler, B.B., Rosenthal, D.B., Thornton, G.C.I.I.I., Bentson, C., 1987. Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 72, 493-511.
4. Goldstein, H.W., Yusko, K.P., Braverman, E.P., Smith, D.B., Chung, B., 1998. The role of cognitive ability in the subgroup differences and incremental validity of assessment center exercises. Personnel Psychology 51, 357-374.
5. Jansen, P.G.W., Stoop, B.A.M., 2001. The dynamics of assessment center validity. Results of a 7-year study. J. Appl. Psychol. 86, 741-753.
6. Klimoski, R.J., Brickner, M., 1987. Why do assessment centers work? The puzzle of assessment center validity. Personnel Psychology 40, 243-260.
7. Lievens, F., 1996. Evaluation des centres d'évaluation: Indices de validité empirique. Psychologie et Psychometric 17, 63-74.
8. Lievens, F., 2001. Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, inter-rater reliability, and discriminant validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 86, 255-264.
9. Lievens, F., Conway, J.M., 2001. Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: A large-scale evaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies. J. Appl. Psychol. 86, 1202-1222.
10. Lievens, F., Goemaere, H., 1999. A different look at assessment centers: Views of assessment center users. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 7, 215-219.
11. Lievens, F., Harris, M.M., Van Keer, E., Bisqueret, C., 2003. Predicting cross-cultural training performance: The validity of personality, cognitive ability, and dimensions measured by an assessment center and a behavior description interview. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 476-489.
12. Ryan, A.M., McFarland, L., Baron, H., Page, R., 1999. An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology 52, 359-391.
13. Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., De Fruyt, F., 2003. International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities: A European community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 56, 573-605.
14. Schmitt, N., Chan, D., 1998. Personnel Selection: A theoretical approach. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
15. Shore, T.H., 1992. Subtle gender bias in the assessment of managerial potential. Sex Roles 27, 499-515.
16. Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Brancart, S., 1999. Les réactions des candidats envers les techniques de sélection du personnel: Une étude dans un contexte francophone. Trav. Hum. 62, 347-361.
17. Walsh, J.P., Weinberg, R.M., Fairfield, M.L., 1987. The effects of gender on assessment centre evaluations. Journal of Occupational Psychology 60, 305-309.