A Different Look at Assessment Centers: Views of Assessment Center Users

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 215-219

  Lievens, Filip ^a   Goemaere, Hans ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033472674     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2389.00122     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ahmed, Y., Payne, T. and Whiddett, S. (1997) A process for assessment exercise design: a model of best practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5, 62-68.
2. Binning, J.F., Adorno, A.J. and Kroeck, K.G. (1997) Validity of behavior checklist and assessor judgmental ratings in an operational assesment center. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St Louis, MO, April.
3. Hauenstein, P.C. (1994) A key behavior approach for improving the utility of developmental assessment centers. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN, April.
4. Hauenstein, N.M.A. and Foti, R.J. (1989) From laboratory to practice: neglected issues in implementing frame-of-reference rater training. Personnel Psychology, 42, 359-378.
5. Latham, G.P. (1989) The reliability, validity, and practicality of the situational interview. In R.W. Eder and G.R. Ferris (eds.) The Employment Interview: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 169-182). Thousands Oaks, CA, Sage.
6. Lievens, F. (1998) Factors which improve the construct validity of assessment centers: A review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 141-152.
7. Newell, S. and Shackleton, V. (1994) Guest Editorial: International differences in selection methods. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 71-73.
8. Pynes, J. and Bernardin, H.J. (1992) Mechanical vs. consensus-derived assessment center ratings: A comparison of job performance validities. Public Personnel Management, 21, 17-28.
9. Reilly, R.R., Henry, S. and Smither, J.W. (1990) An examination of the effects of using behavior checklists on the construct validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 43, 71-84.
10. Sagie, A. and Magnezy, R. (1997) Assessor type, number of distinguishable categories, and assessment centre construct validity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 103-108.
11. Thomton, G.C. III and Byham, W.C. (1982) Assessment centers and managerial performance. New York, Academic Press.
12. Van Dam, K., Altink, W.M.M. and Kok, B. (1992) Assessment center practice: A summary of problems encountered [In Dutch]. De Psycholoog, 7. 509-514.
13. Woehr, D.J. and Huffcutt, A.I. (1994) Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 67, 189-205.