Inducing fuzzy models for student classification

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 223-234

  Nykänen, Ossi ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Fuzzy queries and rules; Fuzzy systems; Linguistic interfaces; Student modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646578471     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Arriaga, F. de, Alami, M. El., & Arriaga, A. (2005). Evaluation of Fuzzy Intelligent Learning Systems. In Méndez-Vilas, A. & González, J. A. M. (Eds.), Proceedings of m-ICTE2005, June 7-10, Spain, retrieved November 24,2005, from http://www.formatex.org/micte2005/200.pdf.
2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuiness, D. L., Nardi, D., & Patel-Schneider, P. F. (2002). Description Logic Handbook, Cambridge University Press.
3. Boag, S., Chamberlin, D., Fernández, M. F., Florescu, D., Robie, J., & Siméon, J. (2005) (Eds.) XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language, W3C Working Draft 04 April 2005, retrieved November 24, 2005 from http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xquery-20050404/.
4. th International Conference on Intelligent user interfaces, San Francisco, California, USA: ACM Press, 23-30.
5. Cox, E. (2005). Fuzzy Modeling and Genetic Algorithms for Data Mining and Exploration, USA: Elsevier.
6. nd annual Southeast regional conference, Huntsville, Alabama, USA: ACM Press, 428-433.
7. Dodds, P. (2001). Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM™) Version 1.2: The SCORM Overview, Advanced Distributed Learning, retrieved November 24, 2005 from http://www.adlnet.org.
8. Hüllermeier, E. (2005). Fuzzy methods in machine learning and data mining: Status and prospects. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 156 (3), 387-406.
9. Ibrahim, A. M. (2001). Assessment of Distance Education Quality Using Fuzzy Sets Model. In Proceedings of the SEFI Annual Conference, Copenhagen, 12-14 September, 2001 (in CD).
10. Jameson, A. (1995). Numerical Uncertainty Management in User and Student Modeling: An Overview of Systems and Issues, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5 (3-4), 193-251.
11. Jameson, A. (2001). Modelling both the Context and the User, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5 (1), 29-33.
12. Jang, J-S. R., & Sun, E. M. (1997). Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing: A Computational Approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence, USA: Prentice Hall.
13. Kavcic, A., Pedraza-Jimenez, R., Molina-Bulla, H., Valverde-Albacete, F. J., Cid-Sueiro, J., & Navia-Vazquez, A. (2003). Student Modelling Based on Fuzzy Inference Mechanisms. In Zajc, B. & Tkalcic, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the EUROCON 2003, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 379-383.
14. th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, USA: ACM Press, 38-45.
15. Lopes, A. L. M., & Lanzer, E. A. (2002). Data envelopment analysis - DEA and fuzzy sets to assess the performance of academic departments: a case study at Federal University of Santa Catarina - UFSC, Pesquisa Operacional, 22 (2), 217-230.
16. Ma, J., & Zhou, D. (2000). Fuzzy Set Approach to the Assessment of Student-Centered Learning, IEEE Transactions on Education, 43 (2), May 2000, 237-241.
17. Mendel, J. M. (2001). Uncertain Rule-Based Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions, USA: Prentice Hall.
18. Mitchell, T. (1997). Machine Learning, USA: McGraw-Hill.
19. Murthy, S. K. (1997). On Growing Better Decision Trees from Data. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, retrieved June 21, 2005 from http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/~salzberg/docs/murthy_thesis/thesis.ps.gz.
20. th International PEG Conference, June 23-26, 2001, Tampere, Finland, 101-108.
21. Nykänen, O. (2004). Fuzziness as a Recognition Problem: Using Decision Tree Learning Algorithms for Inducing Fuzzy Membership Functions. In Zanasi, A., Ebecken, N. F. F. & Brebbia, C. A. (Eds.), Data Mining V, UK: WIT Press, 143-153.
22. Nykänen, O. (2005). Implementing Semantic Web Agents that Learn Upon Experience: A Machine Learning Module for the CWM Rule System. In Guimaraes, N. & Isaias, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Applied Computing, 22-25 February, 2005 Algarve, Portugal, 409-416.
23. Prud'hommeaux, E., & Seaborne, A. (2005). SPARQL Query Language for RDF, W3C Working Draft 19 April 2005, retrieved November 24, 2005 from http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050419/.
24. Russel, S., & Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, USA: Prentice-Hall.
25. Schaffer, C. A. (1994). Conservation Law for Generalization Performance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, San Mateo, Ca., USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 259-265.
26. Stathacopoulou R., Magoulas G. D., & Grigoriadou, M. (1999). Neural network-based fuzzy modeling of the student in intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the INNS-IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, USA, July 1999, retrieved December 5, 2005 from http://www.dcs.bbk. ac.uk/~gmagoulas/JCNN0679.PDF.
27. Stathacopoulou, R., Magoulas, G. D., Grigoriadou, M., & Samarakou, M. (2005). Neuro-fuzzy knowledge processing in intelligent learning environments for improved student diagnosis. Information Sciences, 170 (2-4), 273-307.
28. Suarez, J. (2003). Student evaluation trough membership functions in CAT systems. Revista Mexicana De Fisica, 49 (4), 371-378.
29. rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 4-7, 2000, Maui, Hawaii.
30. Turunen, E. (1999). Mathematics Behind Fuzzy Logic, Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
31. th International Conference on Logic for Programming Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning, October 14-18, 2002, Tbilisi, Georgia.
32. st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 10-13, 2002, Reno, NV, USA.
33. Xenos, M. (2004). Prediction and Assessment of Student Behaviour in Open and Distance education in Computers Using Bayesian Networks. Computers & Education, 43 (4), 345-359.