Argentinean cultivars of Vitis vinifera grow better than European ones when cultured in vitro under salinity

Biocell

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-7

  Cavagnaro, Juan B ^a   Ponce, María T ^a   Guzmán, Javier ^a   Cirrincione, Miguel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Cultivars; Growth; In vitro; Salt tolerance; Vitis vinifera

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ARGENTINA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTIVAR; EUROPE; GRAPE; IN VITRO STUDY; LEAF AREA; NONHUMAN; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STEM; SALINITY; SALT TOLERANCE; SURVIVAL;

ARGENTINA; CULTURE MEDIA; EUROPE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES; VITIS;

VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 33646561775     PISSN: 03279545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alcalde JA (1989). Cultivares vitícolas argentinas. Editorial Cooperativa EEA INTA Mendoza. Argentina, pp. 133.
2. Alexander DMcE, Woodham RC (1968). Relative tolerance of rooted cuttings of four vinifera varieties to sodium chloride. Aust J Exp Agric Animal Husb 8: 461-465.
3. Alexander DMcE, Groot Obbink J (1971). Effect of chloride in solution culture on growth and chloride uptake of Sultana and Salt Creek grape vines. Aust J Exp Agric Animal Husb 11: 357-361.
4. Antcliff AJ, Newman HP, Barrettt HC (1983). Variation in chloride accumulation in some American species of grapevine. Vitis 22: 357-362.
5. Ashraf M, Harris PJC (2004). Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Science 166: 3-16.
6. Barlass M, Skene KGM (1981). Relative NaCl tolerances of grapevine cultivars and hybrids in vitro. Z Pflanzenphysiol 102: 147-161.
7. Basu S, Gangopadhyay G, Mukherjee BB (2002). Salt tolerance in rice in vitro: implication of accumulation of Na, K and proline. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 69: 55-64.
8. Bavaresco L, Fregoni M, Gambi E (1993). In vitro method to screen grapevine genotypes for tolerance to lime-induced chlorosis. Vitis 32: 145-148.
9. Bernstein L, Ehlig CF, Clark RA (1969). Effect of grape rootstocks on chloride accumulation in leaves. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 94(6): 584-590.
10. Downton WJS (1977). Photosynthesis in salt-stressed grapevines. Aust J Plant Physiol 4: 183-192.
11. Galzy R (1964). Technique de thermothérapie des viroses de la vigne. Ann Épiphyties 15: 245-256.
12. Greenway H, Munns R (1980). Mechanisms of salt tolerance in non halophytes. Ann Rev Plat Physiol 31: 149-190.
13. Maas EV, Hoffman GJ (1977). Crop salt tolerance. Current assessment. ASCE J Irrig Drain Div 103: 116-134.
14. Martinez E, Tizio R (1990). Effet de trois milieux minéraux sur la modalite de croisaance et la capacité de micropropagation in vitro de quelques génotypes de vigne (Vitis spp.) C R Soc Biol 184: 318-324.
15. Martinez L, Cavagnaro P, Masuelli R, Rodríguez J (2003). Evaluation of diversity among Argentine grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties using morphological data and AFLP markers. Electronic J Biotechnology 6: 244-253.
16. Mercado JA, Sancho-Carrascosa MA, Jimenez-Bermudez S, Peran-Quesada R, Pliego-Alfaro F, Quesada M (2000). Assessment of in vitro growth of apical stem sections and adventitious organogenesis to evaluate salinity tolerance in cultivated tomato. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 62: 101-106.
17. Munns R (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25: 239-250.
18. Naik PS, Widholm JM (1993). Comparison of tissue culture and whole plant responses to salinity in potato. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult. 33: 273-280.
19. Pandey RM, Divate MR (1976). Salt tolerance in grapes. I. Effect of sodium salts singly and in combination on some of the morphological characters of grape varieties. Indian J Plant Physiol. 19: 230-239.
20. Sauer MR (1968). Effects of vine rootstocks on chloride concentration in sultana scions. Vitis 7: 223-226.
21. Singh SK, Sharma HC, Datta SP, Singh SP (2000). In vitro growth and leaf composition of grapevine cultivars affected by sodium chloride. Biologia Plantarum 43(2): 283-286.
22. Sivritepe M, Eris A (1997). Determining salt tolerance of some grapevine rootstocks under in vitro conditions. Bahce 26 (1-2): 49-65.
23. Sivritepe M, Eris A (1999). Determination of salt tolerance in some grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera) under in vitro conditions. Turkish J Biol. 23: 473-485.
24. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1971). Biometry. 2nd. ed. WH Freeman, San Francisco. 859 pp.
25. Troncoso A, Matte C, Cantos M, Lavee S (1999). Evaluation of salt tolerance of in vitro-grown grapevine rootstock varieties. Vitis 38(2): 55-60.
26. Volkmar KM, Hu Y, Steppuhn H (1998). Physiological responses of plants to salinity: a review. Can J Plant Sci. 78: 19-27.
27. Walker RR (1994). Grapevine responses to salinity. Bull O.I.V 67: 634-661.
28. Walker BR, Blackmore DH, Clingeleffer PR, Correll RL (2002). Rootstock effects on salt tolerance of irrigated field grown grapevnes (Vitis vinifera, L. cv. Sultana). 1. Yield and vigour inter-relationships. Austr J Grape Wine Res. 8: 3-14.
29. Watanabe S, Kojima K, Sasaki S (2000). Effect of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in Populus euphratica in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult. 63: 199-206.
30. Zhu JK (2000). Genetic analysis of plant salt tolerance using Arabidopsis. Palnt Physiol. 124(3): 941-948.