Natural variation in male-induced 'cost-of-mating' and allele-specific association with male reproductive genes in Drosophila melanogaster

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 361, Issue 1466, 2006, Pages 355-361

  Fiumera, Anthony C ^a   Dumont, Bethany L ^a   Clark, Andrew G ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Accessory gland proteins; Cost of reproduction; Sexual conflict; Sexual selection; Sexually antagonistic coevolution

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; FLY; MATING BEHAVIOR; MORTALITY RISK; POLYMORPHISM; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENES, INSECT; MALE; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 33646553583     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1791     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. Arnqvist, G. 2004 Sexual conflict and sexual selection: lost in the chase. Evolution 58, 1383-1388.
2. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002 Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415, 787-789.
3. Baumeister, W., Walz, J., Zuhl, F. & Seemuller, E. 1998 The proteasome: paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell 92, 367-380. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80929-0)
4. Bertram, M. J., Akerkar, G. A., Ard, R. L., Gonzalez, C. & Wolfner, M. F. 1992 Cell type-specific gene expression in the Drosophila melanogaster male accessory gland. Mech. Dev. 38, 33-40. (doi:10.1016/0925-4773(92)90036-J)
5. Chapman, T. & Partridge, L. 1996 Sexual conflict as fuel for evolution. Nature 381, 189-190. (doi:10.1038/381189a0)
6. Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F. & Partridge, L. 1995 Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241-244. (doi:10.1038/373241a0)
7. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. 2003a Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol 18, 41-47. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6)
8. Chapman, T., Bangham, J., Vinti, G., Seifried, B., Lung, O., Wolfner, M. F., Smith, H. K. & Partridge, L. 2003b The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster, female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9923-9928. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1631635100)
9. Chen, P. S., Stumm-Zollinger, E., Aigaki, T., Balmer, J., Bienz, M. & Bohlen, P. 1988 A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior of female D. melanogaster. Cell 54, 291-298. (doi: 10.1016/0092- 8674(88)90192-4)
10. Chippindale, A. K., Gibson, J. R. & Rice, W. R. 2001 Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1671-1675. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 041378098)
11. Churchill, G. A. & Doerge, R. W. 1994 Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138, 963-971.
12. Civetta, A. & Clark, A. G. 2000 Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13162-13165. (doi:10.1073/pnas.230305397)
13. Civetta, A., Montooth, K. L. & Mendelson, M. 2005 Quantitative trait loci and interaction effects responsible for variation in female postmating mortality in Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia introgression lines. Heredity 94, 94-100. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800570)
14. Crudgington, H. S. & Siva-Jothy, M. T. 2000 Genital damage, kicking and early death-the battle of the sexes takes a sinister turn in the bean weevil. Nature 407, 855-856. (doi:10.1038/35038154)
15. DiBenedetto, A. J., Harada, H. A. & Wolfner, M. F. 1990 Structure, cell-specific expression, and mating-induced regulation of a Drosophila melanogaster male accessory-gland gene. Dev. Biol. 139, 134-148. (doi:10.1016/0012-1606(90)90284-P)
16. Eberhard, W. G. 2004a Male-female conflict and genitalia: failure to confirm predictions in insects and spiders. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 79, 121-186. (doi:10.1017/S1464793103006237)
17. Eberhard, W. G. 2004b Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution 58, 1947-1970.
18. Eberhard, W. G. 2005 Evolutionary conflicts of interest: are female sexual decisions different? Am. Nat. 165, S19-S25. (doi:10.1086/429348)
19. Fiumera, A. C., Dumont, B. L. & Clark, A. G. 2005 Sperm competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster associated with variation in male reproductive proteins. Genetics 169, 243-257. (doi:10.1534/genetics.104.032870)
20. Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. 1989 A cost of mating in female fruit-flies. Nature 338, 760-761. (doi:10.1038/338760a0)
21. Gibson, J. R., Chippindale, A. K. & Rice, W. R. 2002 The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 499-505. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1863)
22. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. 1998 Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52, 1-7.
23. Johnstone, R. A. & Keller, L. 2000 How males can gain by harming their mates: sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating. Am. Nat. 156, 368-377. (doi:10.1086/303392)
24. Kemp, D. J. & Rutowski, R. L. 2004 A survival cost to mating in a polyandrous butterfly, Colias eurytheme. Oikos 105, 65-70. (doi:10.1111/j.0030- 1299.2004.12874.x)
25. Knell, R. J. & Webberley, M. K. 2004 Sexually transmitted diseases of insects: distribution, evolution, ecology and host behaviour. Biol. Rev. 79, 557-581. (doi:10.1017/S1464793103006365)
26. Lazzaro, B. P., Sceurman, B. K. & Clark, A. G. 2004 Genetic basis of natural variation in D. melanogaster antibacterial immunity. Science 303, 1873-1876. (doi:10.1126/science.1092447)
27. Linder, J. E. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 568-575. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00872.x)
28. Liu, H. F. & Kubli, E. 2003 Sex-peptide is the molecular basis of the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9929-9933. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1631700100)
29. Ma, J., Katz, E. & Belote, J. M. 2002 Expression of proteasome subunit isoforms during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Mol. Biol. 11, 627-639. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2583.2002.00374.x)
30. Magnhagen, C. 1991 Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 183-185. (doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90210-0)
31. Martin, O. Y. & Hosken, D. J. 2004 Reproductive consequences of population divergence through sexual conflict. Curr. Biol. 14, 906-910. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.043)
32. Michiels, N. K. 1998 Mating conflicts and sperm competition in simultaneous hermaphrodites. In Sperm competition and sexual selection (ed. T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller), pp. 219-254. London: Academic Press.
33. Morrow, E. H. & Arnqvist, G. 2003 Costly traumatic insemination and a female counter-adaptation in bed bugs. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 2377-2381. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2514)
34. Morrow, E. H., Arnqvist, G. & Pitnick, S. 2003 Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? Behav. Ecol 14, 802-806. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arg073)
35. Parker, G. A. 1979 Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (ed. M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum), pp. 123-166. New York: Academic Press.
36. Parker, G. A. & Partridge, L. 1998 Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 353, 261-274. (doi:10.1098/rstb.l998.0208)
37. Partridge, L., Gems, D. & Withers, D. J. 2005 Sex and death: what is the connection? Cell 120, 461-472. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.026)
38. Pitnick, S. & Garcia-Gonzalez, F. 2002 Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 1821-1828. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2090)
39. Pizzari, T. & Snook, R. R. 2003 Perspective: sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57, 1223-1236.
40. Pizzari, T. & Snook, R. R. 2004 Sexual conflict and sexual selection: measuring antagonistic coevolution. Evolution 58, 1389-1393.
41. Reinhardt, K., Naylor, R. & Siva-Jothy, M. T. 2003 Reducing a cost of traumatic insemination: female bedbugs evolve a unique organ. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 2371-2375. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2515)
42. Rice, W. R. 1992 Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence. Science 256, 1436-1439.
43. Rice, W. R. 1996 Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381, 232-234. (doi:10.1038/381232a0)
44. Rice, W. R. 1998 Male fitness increases when females are eliminated from gene pool: implications for the Y chromosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6217-6221. (doi:10.1073/pnas.95.11.6217)
45. Rice, W. R. 2000 Dangerous liaisons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12953-12955. (doi:10.1073/pnas.97.24.12953)
46. Rice, W. R. & Chippindale, A. K. 2001 Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 685-693. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00319.x)
47. Rice, W. R. & Holland, B. 1997 The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 1-10. (doi:10.1007/s002650050357)
48. Rowe, L. & Arnqvist, G. 2002 Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes. Evolution 56, 754-767.
49. Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. 2003 Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440-9445. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100)
50. Swanson, W. J. & Vacquier, V. D. 2002 The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 137-144. (doi:10.1038/nrg733)
51. Wigby, S. & Chapman, T. 2005 Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 15, 316-321. (doi:10.1016/j.cub. 2005.01.051)
52. Yanagi, S. & Miyatake, T. 2003 Costs of mating and egg production in female Callosobruchus chinensis. J. Insect Physiol. 49, 823-827. (doi:10.1016/S0022-1910(03)00119-7)