Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis;Eco-Doppler ed angio-RM nella valutazione della stenosi carotidea

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 93-103

  D'Onofrio, M ^a   Mansueto, G ^a   Faccioli, N ^a   Guarise, A ^b   Tamellini, P ^b   Bogina, G ^b   Mucelli, R Pozzi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital   (Italy)

Author keywords

Carotid Stenosis; Digital subtraction angiography; Doppler US; Magnetic resonance angiography; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; ULCEROGENESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE; MEGLUMINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; CAROTID STENOSIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MEGLUMINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 33646550537     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-006-0010-y     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445-453
2. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group (1991) MRC European carotid surgery trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) stenosis or with mild (0-29%) stenosis. Lancet 337:1235-1244
3. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atheroslerosis Study (1995) Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273:1421-1428
4. Borisch I, Horn M, Butz B et al (2003) Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of CEMRA and US with DSA. Am J Neuroradiol 24:1117-1122
5. Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS, Hodgson KJ et al (1993) The influence of carotid siphon stenosis on short- and long-term outcome after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 17:902-911
6. Nederkoorn PJ, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC et al (2002) Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing. Stroke 33:2003-2008
7. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F et al (2001) Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 220:179-185
8. Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A et al (2002) Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR 23:213-219
9. Rouleau PA, Huston III J, Gilbertson J et al (1999) Carotid Artery Tandem Lesion: frequency of angiographic detection and consequences forendarterectomy. AJNR 20:621-625
10. Streifler JY, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ et al (1994) Angiographic detection of carotid plaque ulceration: comparison with surgical observation in a multicenter study. Stroke 25:1130-1132
11. Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke 34:660-664
12. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K et al (2003) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227:522-528
13. Bluth EI, Sunshine JH, Lyons JB et al (2000) Power Doppler imaging: initial evaluation as a screening examination for carotid artery stenosis. Radiology 215:791-800
14. Fürst G, Saleh A, Wenserski F et al (1999) Reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion. Stroke 30:1444-1449
15. Huston J, Nichols DA, Luetmer PH et al (1998) MR angiographic and sonographic indications for endarterectomy. AJNR 19:309-315
16. Khaw K-T (1997) Does carotid duplex imaging render angiography redundant before carotid endarterectomy? Br J Radiol 70:235-238
17. Nonent M, Serfaty JM, Nighghossian N et al (2004) Concordance of 3 noninvasive imaging techniques to measure carotid stenosis in clinical routine practice: results of the CARMEDAS multicenter study. Stroke 35:682-686
18. Rofsky NM, Adelman MA (1998) Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries: a small step, a giant leap? Radiology 209:31-34
19. Wetzel SG, Haselhorst R, Bilecen D et al (2001) Preliminary experience with dynamic MR preliminary experience with dynamic angiography in the evaluation of cervicocranial steno-occlusive disease. Eur Radiol 11:295-302
20. Arbeille P, Desombre C, Aesh B et al (1995) Quantification and assessment of carotid artery lesions: degree of stenosis and plaque volume. J Clin Ultrasound 23:113-124
21. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR et al (1996) Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 201:705-710
22. Eckstein HH, Winter R, Eichbaum M et al (2001) Grading of internal carotid artery: validation of Doppler/Duplex ultrasound criteria and angiography against endarterectomy specimen. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:301-310
23. Elgersma OE, Buijs PC, Wüst AFJ et al (1999) Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital substraction angiography. Radiology 213:777-783
24. Pozzi Mucelli F, Calgaro A, Bruni S et al (2005) Three dimensional rotational angiography of the carotid arteries with high flow injection from the aortic arch. Preliminary experience. Radiol Med 109:108-117
25. Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, van der Graaf Y et al (2003) Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 228:677-682
26. Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G (1998) Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography-preliminary study. Radiology 170:489-495
27. Scarabino T, Carriero A, Giannatempo GM et al (1999) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. J Neuroradiol 23:208-215
28. Serfaty JM, Chirossel P, Chevallier JM et al (2000) Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:455-463
29. Fellner FA, Fellner C, Wutke R et al (2000) Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA and 3D time-of-flight turbo MRA of the carotid arteries: first clinical experiences in correlation with ultrasound, x-ray angiography, and endarterectomy findings. Magn Reson Imaging 18:575-585
30. Huston III J, Fain SB, Wald JT et al (2001) Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography. Radiology 218:138-143
31. Johnson MB, Wilkinson ID, Wattam J et al (2000) Comparison of Doppler Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance angiographic techniques and catheter angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. Clin Radiol 55:912-920
32. Alexandrov AV, Bladin CF, Maggisano R et al (1993) Measuring carotid stenosis. Time for a reappraisal. Stroke 24:1292-1296
33. Pan XM, Saloner D, Reilly LM et al (1995) Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. J Vasc Surg 21:82-89