Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA)

Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 87-91

  Scarabino, T ^a   Carriero, A ^b   Giannatempo, G M ^b   Marano, R ^b   De Matthaeis, P ^b   Bonomo, L ^b   Salvolini, U ^b  

^a Scientific Institute   (Italy)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Carotid arteries; Comparative studies; Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA); Stenosis and occlusion

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CAROTID STENOSIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 0032839917     PISSN: 01509861     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ACKERMANN RH, CANDIA MR. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by MR Angiography. AJNR 1992 ; 13 : 1005-1008.
2. ANDERSON CM, HAACKE EM. Approaches to diagnostic Magnetic Resonnance carotid Angiography. Seminar in ultrasound, CT and MRI, 1992 ; 13(4) : 246-255.
3. BONGARTZ GM. Carotid Magnetic Resonance Angiography. In : EK Yucel : Magnetic Resonnance Angiography : a practical approach. New York, McGraw-Hill : 1995 ; 53-67.
4. EDELMAN RR. MR Angiography : present and future. AJR 1993 ; 161 : 1-11.
5. NAIDICH TP, RIGHI AM. Neurovascular imaging. Radiol Clin N A 1995 ; 33 : 115-166.
6. LASTER RE, ACKER JD, HALFORD HH et al. Assessment of MRA vs arteriography for evaluation of cervical carotid bifurcation disease. AJNR 1993 ; 14 : 681-688.
7. PAN XM, ANDERSON CM, REILLY LM. Magnetic Resonnance Angiography of the carotid artery combining two and three dimensional acquisition. J Vasc Surg 1992 ; 16 : 609-618.
8. PATEL MR, KLUFAS RA, KIM D et al. Angiography of the carotid bifurcation : artifact and limitations. AJR 1994 ; 162 : 1431-1437.
9. SCARABINO T, CARRIERO A, MAGARELLI N et al. MR Angiography in carotid stenosis : a comparison of threee techniques. Europ J Radiol 1998 ; 28 : 117-125.
10. LEUNG DA, MC KINNON GC, DAVIS CP. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996 ; 200 (2) : 561-571.
11. LEVY RA, PRINCE MR. Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the carotid arteries. AJR 1996 ; 167 : 211-215.
12. PRINCE MR, GRIST TM, DEBATIN JF. 3D contrast MR Angiography. Berlin ; Springer, 1997.
13. PRINCE MR, NARASIMHAM DL, STANLEY JC et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995 ; 197 : 785-792.
14. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991 ; 325 : 445-453.
15. CARRIFRO A, UCCHINO. S, MAGARELLI N et al. Carotid bifurcation : a comparative study between MR angiography. J Neurorad 1995 ; 22 : 103-111.
16. SIMEONE A. CARRIERO A, ARMILLOTTA M et al. Spiral CT angiography in the study of carotid stenosis. J Neurorad 1997 ; 24 : 17-22.
17. MAGARELLLI N, SCARABINO T, SIMEONE A et al. Carotid stenosis : a comparison between MR and spiral CT angiography. Neuroradiology 1998 ; 40 : 367-373.