Table-moving contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of lower extremity peripheral arterial bypass grafts

Journal Belge de Radiologie

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 67-71

  Hakyemez, B ^a   Koroglu, M ^b,d   Yildiz, H ^b   Erdogan, C ^a   Atasoy, S ^c   Yurdaeken, K ^c  

^a ULUDAG UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^c Bursa State Hospital   (Turkey)

^d NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Arteries, grafts and prostheses; Extremities, blood supply; Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADODIAMIDE; GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ANEURYSM; ARTERY BYPASS; ARTERY INJURY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DACRON IMPLANT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; GRAFT DYSFUNCTION; GRAFT OCCLUSION; HUMAN; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; POLITEF IMPLANT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LOWER EXTREMITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; SAPHENOUS VEIN;

EID: 33646532676     PISSN: 00217646     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Stoffers H.E., Kaiser V., Knottnerus J.A.: Prevalence in general practice. In: Fowkes F.G.R., ed. Epidemiology of peripheral vascular disease. London: Springer-Verlag, 1991: 109-115.
2. Guthaner D.F., Wexler L., Enzmann D.R., et al.: Evaluation of peripheral vascular disease using digital subtraction angiography. Radiology, 1983, 147: 393-398.
3. Winterer J.T., Laubenberger J., Scheffler K., et al.: Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1999, 23: 583-589.
4. Reid S.K., Pagan-Marin H.R., Menzoian J.O., Woodson J., Yucel E.K.: Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Vasc Interv Radiol, 2001, 12: 45-53.
5. Waugh J.R., Sacharias N.: Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology, 1992, 182: 243-246.
6. Earls J.P., Patel N.H., Smith P.A., DeSena S., Meissner M.H.: Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. AJR, 1998, 171: 599-604.
7. Loewe C., Schoder M., Rand T., et al.: Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. AJP, 2002, 179: 1013-1021.
8. McCauley T.R., Monib A., Dickey K.W., et al.: Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: accuracy and reliability of time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology, 1994, 192: 351-357.
9. Glickerman D.J., Obregon R.G., Schmiedl U.P., et al.: Cardiac-gated MR angiography of the entire lower extremity: a prospective comparison with conventional angiography. AJP, 1996, 167: 445-451.
10. Ho V.B., Corse W.R.: MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and peripheral vessels. Radiol Clin North Am, 2003, 41: 115-144.
11. Ho K.Y.J.A.M., Lerner T., deHaan M.W., Kessels A.G.H., Kitslaar P.J.E.H.M., van Engelhoven J.M.A.: Peripheral vascular tree stenosis: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology, 1998, 206: 683-692.
12. Ho V.B., Choyke P.L., Foo T.K.F., et al.: Automated bolus chase peripheral MR angiography: initial practical experiences and future directions of this work-in-progress. J Magn Reson Imag, 1999, 10: 376-388.
13. Landry G.J., Moneta G.L., Taylor L.M. Jr, et al.: Duplex scanning alone is not sufficient imaging before secondary procedures after lower extremity reversed vein bypass graft. J Vasc Surg, 1999, 29: 270-28.
14. Reimer P., Landwehr P. Non-invasive vascular imaging of peripheral vessels. Eur Radiol, 1998, 8: 858-872.
15. Bertschinger K., Cassina P.C., Debatin J.F., Ruehm S.G.: Surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with three-dimensional MR angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR, 2001, 176: 215-220.
16. Shellock F.G., Kanal E.: Aneurysm clips: evaluation of MR imaging artifacts at 1.5 T. Radiology, 1998, 209: 563-566.
17. Bendib K., Berthezene Y., Croisille P., Villard J., Douek P.C.: Assessment of complicated arterial bypass grafts: value of contrast-enhanced subtractions magnetic resonance angiography. J Vasc Surg, 1997, 26: 1036-1042.
18. Loewe C., Cejna M., Lammer J., Thurnher S.A.: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of peripheral bypass grafts. Eur Radiol, 2000, 10: 725-732.
19. Rofsky N.M., Johnson G., Ademan M.A., Rosen R.J., Krinsky G.A., Weinreb J.C.: Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology, 1997, 205: 163-169.