Aesthetic effect of minor changes in incisor angulation: An internet evaluation

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 430-435

  Brunzel, S ^a,b   Kern, M ^a   Freitag, S ^b   Wolfart, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Dental appearance; Incisor angulation; Tooth arrangement; Web based survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL ASSISTANT; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL STUDENT; DENTIST; ESTHETICS; HUMAN; INCISOR; INTERNET; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

BEAUTY; DENTAL TECHNICIANS; DENTISTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; INCISOR; INTERNET; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, DENTAL; TOOTH MOVEMENT;

EID: 33646503887     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01573.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Carlsson GE Otterland A Wennstrom A Patient factors in appreciation of complete dentures J Prosthet Dent 1967 17 322 328
2. Dong JK Jin TH Cho HW Oh SC The esthetics of the smile: a review of some recent studies Int J Prosthodont 1999 12 9 19
3. Goldstein RE Garber DA Goldstein CE et al. Esthetic update: the changing esthetic dental practice J Am Dent Assoc 1994 125 1447 1456
4. Graber LW Lucker GW Dental esthetic self-evaluation and satisfaction Am J Orthod 1980 77 163 173
5. Levin EI Dental esthetics and the golden proportion J Prosthet Dent 1978 40 244 252
6. Lloyd PM Fixed prosthodontics and esthetic considerations for the older adult J Prosthet Dent 1994 72 525 531
7. Dunn WJ Murchison DF Broome JC Esthetics: patients' perceptions of dental attractiveness Int J Prosthodont 1996 5 166 171
8. Bos A Hoogstraten J Prahl-Andersen B Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in orthodontic patients Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003 123 127 132
9. Faure JC Rieffe C Maltha JC The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics Eur J Orthod 2002 24 1 7
10. Angle EH Malocclusion of the teeth 7 edn Philadelphia (PA) SS White Dental Manufacturing 1907
11. Sergl HG Schmidt H Experimentelle Untersuchung zur ästhetischen Wirkung charateristischer Anomalien der Frontzähne Fortschr KFO 1973 34 359 369
12. Davis LG Ashworth PD Spriggs LS Psychological effects of aesthetic dental treatment J Dent 1998 26 547 554
13. Kokich VO Jr. Kiyak HA Shapiro PA Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics J Esthet Dent 1999 11 311 324
14. Miller AG Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation Psychol Sci 1970 19 241 243
15. Shaw WC Rees G Dawe M Charles CR The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults Am J Orthod 1985 87 21 26
16. Shaw WC The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults Am J Orthod 1981 79 399 415
17. Marunick MT Chamberlain BB Robinson CA Denture aesthetics: an evaluation of laymen's preferences J Oral Rehabil 1983 10 399 406
18. Brisman AS Esthetics: a comparison of dentists' and patients' concepts J Am Dent Assoc 1980 100 345 352
19. Wagner IV Carlsson GE Ekstrand K Odman P Schneider N A comparative study of assessment of dental appearance by dentists, dental technicians, and laymen using computer-aided image manipulation J Esthet Dent 1996 8 199 205
20. Carlsson GE Wagner IV Odman P et al. An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computer-aided image manipulation Int J Prosthodont 1998 11 246 254
21. Wolfart S Brunzel S Freitag S Kern M Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor angulation Int J Prosthodont 2004 17 151 155
22. Magne P Belser U Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: a biomimetic approach 1 edn Chicago (IL) Quintessence 2002
23. Tedesco LA Albino JE Cunat JJ Green LJ Lewis EA Slakter MJ A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Part I. Reliability and validity Am J Orthod 1983 83 38 43
24. Riva G Teruzzi T Anolli L The use of the internet in psychological research: comparison of online and offline questionnaires Cyberpsychol Behav 2003 6 73 80
25. Meyerson P Tryon WW Validating internet research: a test of the psychometric equivalence of internet and in-person samples Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2003 35 614 620
26. Rufenacht CR Principles of esthetic integration 1 edn Chicago (IL) Quintessence 2000
27. Schärer P Rinn LA Kopp FR Esthetic guidelines for restorative dentistry 1 edn Chicago (IL) Quintessence 1982
28. Magne P Belser U Adhäsiv befestigte Keraminkrestaurationen 1 edn Berlin Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH 2002
29. Von Zerssen D Koeller D-M Klinische Selbstbeurteilungs-Skalen (KSB-S) aus dem Muenchener Psychiatrischen Informations-System. Die Befindlichkeitsskala Weilheim Beltz 1976
30. Baumann U. D.v Zerssen: Klinische Selbstbeurteilungs-Skalen (KSb-S) (Tests und Untersuchungsmethoden) Diagnostica 1977 23 283 285
31. Rosenstiel SF Rashid RG Public preferences for anterior tooth variations: a web-based study J Esthet Restor Dent 2002 14 97 106
32. Rosenstiel SF Ward DH Rashid RG Dentists' preference of anterior tooth proportion - A web-based study Int J Prosthodont 2000 9 123 136
33. Vallittu PK Vallittu AS Lassila VP Dental aesthetics - a survey of attitudes in different groups of patients J Dent 1996 24 335 338