Measuring Canadian business school research output and impact

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 97-123

  Erkut, Erhan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036625795     PISSN: 08250383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-4490.2002.tb00674.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barman S., Hanna, M.D., & LaForge, R.L. (2001). Perceived relevance and quality of POM journals: A decade later. Journal of Operations Management, 19 (3), 367-385.
2. Beamish, P.W. (2000). Knowledge creators or knowledge retailers? Business school research in Canada. ASAC 2000 Conference Proceedings, 21 (10), 1-9.
3. Business Week (2000). Keeping tabs on B-school brain-power, October 2, 2000, http://www.businessweek.com: /2000/00_40/b3701015.htm (accessed July 2001).
4. Cameron, R.D. (1997). A universal citation database as a catalyst for reform in scholarly communication, http://elib.cs.sfu.ca/project/papers/citebase/citebase.html (accessed November 2000).
5. Doyle, J.R. & Arthurs, A.J. (1995). Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study. OMEGA, 23 (3), 257-270.
6. DuBois, F.L. & Reeb, D. (2000). Ranking the international business journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (4), 689-704.
7. Dusansky, R. & Vernon, C.J. (1998). Ranking of U.S. economics departments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12 (1), 157-170.
8. Erkut, E. (2001). Comparing research output and impact of Canadian business schools in OR journals. CORS Bulletin, 35 (4).
9. Fox, M.F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.
10. Harter, S.P. (1996). The impact of electronic journals on scholarly communication: A citation analysis. Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 7 (5), http://info.lib.uh.edu/pr/v7/n5/hart7n5.html (accessed November 2000).
11. Im, K.S., Kim, K.Y., & Kim, J.S. (1998). An assessment of individual and institutional research productivity in MIS. Decision Line, 29 (1), 8-12.
12. Institute for Scientific Information (2001). The ISI® Database: The journal selection process, http://www.isinet.com/isi/ hot/essays/selectionofmaterialforcoverage/199701.htmt (accessed May 2001).
13. Klemkosky, R. & Tuttle, D. (1977). The institutional source and concentration of financial research. Journal of Finance, 32 (3), 901-907.
14. Laband, D.N. & Piette, M.J. (1994). The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970-1990. Journal of Economic Literature, 32 (2), 640-666.
15. National Science Foundation Bibliometrics Database, http://www.rand.org/centers/stpi/stp/desc/bibliometrics.html (accessed November 2000).
16. Niemi, A.W. (1988). Publication performance of marketing departments: 1975-1985. Journal of Marketing Education, 10 (2), 8-12.
17. Phelan, T.J. (2000). Evaluation of scientific productivity. The Scientist, 14 (19), 39.
18. Price, D.J. de Solla (1971). Some remarks on elitism in information and the invisible college phenomenon in science. JASIS, 22, 74-75.
19. Science Watch (1996). Citation analysis reveals top Canadian universities in 20 disciplines. Reprinted in The Scientist, 10 (2), 13, http://www.the-scientist.com/yr1996/jan/exp_960122.html (accessed November 2000).
20. Tahai, A. & Meyer, M.J. (1999). A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (3), 279-296.
21. Trieschmann, J.S., Dennis, A.R., Northcraft, G.B., & Niemi, A.W. (2000). Serving multiple constituencies in the business School: MBA program vs. research performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (6), 1130-1141.
22. Vokurka, R.J. (1996). The relative importance of journals used in operations management research: A citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 14 (4), 345-355.