Building on theoretical principles gleaned from Reading Recovery to inform classroom practice

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 254-267

  Cox, Beverly E ^a   Hopkins, Carol J ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646495750     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.41.2.5     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. ALLINGTON, R.L. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers: A research-based approach. New York: Longman.
2. ALLINGTON, R.L. (2002). Research on reading/learning disability interventions. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 261-290). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3. ALLINGTON, R.L. (2005). How much evidence is enough evidence? Journal of Reading Recovery, 4(2), 8-11.
4. ALVERMANN, D.E. (1990). Reading teacher education. In W.R. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the Association of Teacher Educators (pp. 687-704). New York: Macmillan.
5. ASKEW, B.J., FOUNTAS, I.C., LYONS, C.A., PINNELL, G.S., & SCHMITT, M.C. (2000). A review of Reading Recovery. In R.D. Robinson, M.C. McKenna, & J.M. Wedman (Eds.), Issues and trends in literacy education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. ASKEW, B.J., & FRASIER, D.F. (1994). Sustained effects of Reading Recovery intervention on the cognitive behaviors of second grade children and the perceptions of their teachers. Literacy, Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Literacy, 1(1), 87-107.
7. ASKEW, B.J., FULENWIDER, T., KORDICK, R., SCHEUERMANN, S., VOLLENWEIDER, P., ET AL. (2002). Constructing a model of professional development to support early literacy classrooms. In E.M. Rodgers & G.S. Pinnell (Eds.), Learning from teaching in literacy education: New perspectives in professional development (pp. 29-51). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8. ASKEW, B.J., KAYE, E., FRASIER, D.F., MOBASHER, M., ANDERSON, N., & RODRIGUEZ, Y. (2002). Making a case for prevention in education. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 6(2), 43-73.
9. BRIGGS, C., & YOUNG, B.K. (2003). Does Reading Recovery work in Kansas? A retrospective longitudinal study of sustained effects. Journal of Reading Recovery, 3(1), 59-64.
10. BROOKS, G., FLANAGAN, N., HENKHUZENS, Z., & HUTCHINSON, D. (1998). What works for slow readers? The effectiveness of early intervention schemes. Slough, England: National Foundation for Educational Research.
11. BROWN, W., DENTON, E., KELLY, P., & NEAL, J. (1999). Reading Recovery effectiveness: A five-year success story in San Luis Coastal Unified School District. ERS Spectrum, 17(1), 3-12.
12. CAZDEN, C.B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13. CENTER, Y., WHELDALL, K., FREEMAN, L., OUTHRED, L., & MCNAUGHT, M. (1995). An evaluation of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240-263.
14. CLAY, M.M. (1966). Emergent reading behaviour. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
15. CLAY, M.M. (1975). What did I write? Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
16. CLAY, M.M. (1979). The early detection of reading difficulties. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
17. CLAY, M.M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties: A diagnostic survey with recovery procedures. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
18. CLAY, M.M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19. CLAY, M.M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
20. CLAY, M.M. (1998). By different paths to common outcomes. York, ME: Stenhouse.
21. CLAY, M.M. (2001). Change over time in children's literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. CLAY, M.M. (2002). An observation survey of early literacy achievement (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
23. CLAY, M.M. (2004). Simply by sailing in a new direction you could change the world. In C.M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, B. Maloch, J.V. Hoffman, & D.L. Schallert (Eds.), 53rd yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 60-66). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
24. CLAY, M.M., & WATSON, B. (1982). An inservice program for Reading Recovery teachers. In M.M. Clay (Ed.), Observing young readers (pp. 192-200). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
25. COX, B.E. (1994). Young children's regulatory talk: Evidence of emergent metacognitive control over literacy products and practices. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 733-756). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
26. COX, B.E., FANG, Z., & OTTO, B.W. (2004). Preschoolers' developing ownership of the literate register. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 281-312). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
27. COX, B.E., FANG, Z., & SCHMITT, M.C. (1998). At-risk children's metacognitive growth during Reading Recovery experiences: A Vygotskian interpretation. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 3(1), 55-76.
28. COX, B.E., SHANAHAN, T., & SULZBY, E. (1990). Good and poor elementary readers' use of cohesion in writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 47-65.
29. CUNNINGHAM, P.M., & ALLINGTON, R.L. (1994). Classrooms that work. New York: HarperCollins.
30. CUNNINGHAM, P.M., & ALLINGTON, R.L. (1996). Schools that work: Where all children read and write. New York: HarperCollins.
31. D'AGOSTINO, J.V., & MURPHY, J.A. (2004). A meta-analysis of Reading Recovery in United States schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 23-38.
32. DARLING-HAMMOND, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: Center for Teaching Policy, University of Washington.
33. DENTON, C., FLETCHER, J., & CIANCIO, D. (2005). Validity, reliability, and utility of the Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 8-34.
34. DUFFY, G.G. (1993). Rethinking strategy instruction: Four teachers' development and their low achievers understandings. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 231-247.
35. ESCAMILLA, K., LOERA, M., RUIZ, O., & RODRIGUEZ, Y. (1998). An examination of sustaining effects in Descubriendo la Lectura programs. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 3(2), 59-81.
36. FANG, Z., SCHLEPPEGRELL, M., & COX, B.E. (2005). Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
37. FOUNTAS, I.C., & PINNELL, G.S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
38. GAFFNEY, J.S., & ANDERSON, R.C. (1991). Two-tiered scaffolding: Congruent processes of teaching and learning. In E.H. Hiebert (Ed.), Literacy for a diverse society (pp. 184-198). New York: Teachers College Press.
39. GAFFNEY, J.S., & ASKEW, B.J. (1999). Stirring the waters: The influence of Marie Clay. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
40. GEE, J. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York: Palmer Press.
41. GEE, J. (2004). Reading as situated language: A sociolinguistic perspective. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 116-132). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
42. GOMEZ-BELLENGE, F.X., RODGERS, E.M., & SCHULZ, M. (2005). Reading Recovery and Descubriendo la Lectura National Report 2003-2004. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
43. GOMEZ-BELLENGE, F.X., RODGERS, E., & WANG, C. (2004, February). Gauging the effectiveness of an early intervention: The case of Reading Recovery. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Title I Conference, New Orleans, LA.
44. HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.
45. HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. New York: Edward Arnold.
46. HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
47. HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (2004). The place of dialogue in children's construction of meaning. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 133-145). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
48. HALLIDAY, M.A.K., & HASAN, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. HERMAN, R., & STRINGFIELD, S. (1997). Ten promising pro grams for educating all children: Evidence of impact. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
50. IVERSON, S., & TUNMER, W. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 112-126.
51. KNIGHT, S., & STALLINGS, J. (1995). The implementation of the Accelerated School model in an urban elementary school. In R.L. Allington & S.A. Walmsley (Eds.), No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America's elementary schools (pp. 236-251). New York: Teachers College Press; Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
52. LYONS, CA (1991). A comparative study of the teaching effectiveness of teachers participating in a year-long and two-week inservice program. In J. Zuteil & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learning factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction. 40th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 367-375). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
53. LYONS, C.A. (1993). The use of questions in the teaching of high risk beginning readers: A profile of a developing Reading Recovery teacher. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 29, 1-42.
54. LYONS, C.A. (1994). Constructing chains of reasoning in Reading Recovery demonstration lessons. In C.K. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice: 43rd yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 276-286). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
55. LYONS, CA, & BEAVER, J. (1995). Reducing retention and learning disability placement through Reading Recovery: An educationally sound cost-effective choice. In R.L. Allington & SA. Walmsley (Eds.), No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America's elementary schools (pp. 116-136). New York: Teachers College Press; Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
56. LYONS, CA., PINNELL, G.S., & DEFORD, D.E. (1993). Partners in learning: Teachers and children in Reading Recovery. New York: Teachers College Press.
57. MCGILL-FRANZEN, A., ALLINGTON, R.L., YOKOI, L., & BROOKS, G. (1999). Putting books in the room seems necessary but not sufficient. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 57-74.
58. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
59. NEUMAN, S.B., & CELANO, D. (2001). Access to print in low-income and middle-income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 8-26.
60. NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001. Pub. L. 107-110. 115 Stat. 425. (2002).
61. PEARSON, P.D. (2003). Foreword. In S. Forbes & C. Briggs (Eds.), Research in Reading Recovery (Vol. 2, pp. ix-xii). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
62. PIAGET, J. (1973). The language and thought of the child. New York: World.
63. PIKULSKI, J.J. (1994). Preventing reading failure: A review of five effective programs. The Reading Teacher, 48, 30-39.
64. PINNELL, G.S. (1989). Reading Recovery: Helping at-risk children learn to read. Elementary School Journal, 90, 161-183.
65. PINNELL, G.S. (1994). An inquiry-based model for educating teachers of literacy. Literacy, Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Literacy, 7, 29-42.
66. PINNELL, G.S. (1997). Reading Recovery: A summary of research. In J. Flood, S.B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 638-654). New York: Macmillan.
67. PINNELL, G.S., LYONS, CA., DEFORD, D.E., BRYK, A.S., & SELTZER, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 8-39.
68. PRESSLEY, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works. New York: Guilford.
69. PRESSLEY, M., ALLINGTON, R.L., WHARTON-MCDONALD, R., BLOCK, C.C., & MORROW, L.M. (2001). Learning to read: Lessons from exemplary first-grade classrooms. New York: Guilford.
70. PRESSLEY, M., & ROEHRIG, A. (2005). Reading Recovery as professional development: Looking at classroom teachers. Journal of Reading Recovery, 4(2), 12-15.
71. READING RECOVERY COUNCIL OF NORTH AMERICA. (2004). Standards and guidelines of Reading Recovery in the United States (4th ed.). Columbus, OH: Author.
72. RODGERS, E.M., FULLERTON, S.K., & DEFORD, D.E. (2002). Making a difference with professional development. In E.M. Rodgers & G.S. Pinnell (Eds.), Learning from teaching in literacy education: New perspectives on professional development (pp. 119-134). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
73. ROWE, D.W. (1989). Preschoolers' use of metacognitive knowledge and strategies in self-selected literacy events. In S. McCormick & J. Zuteil (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives far literacy research and instruction: 38th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 65-76). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
74. ROWE, K.J. (1995). Factors affecting students' progress in reading: Key findings from a longitudinal study. Literacy, Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Literacy, 1(2), 57-110.
75. RUHE, V., & MOORE, P. (2005). The impact of Reading Recovery on later achievement in reading and writing. ERS Spectrum, 23(1), 20-30.
76. SAMUELS, S.J. (2004). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading revisited. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1127-1148). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
77. SCHMITT, M.C., ASKEW, B.J., FOUNTAS, I.C., LYONS, C.A., & PINNELL, G.S. (2005). Changing futures: The influence of Reading Recovery in the United States. Worthington, OH: Reading Recovery Council of North America.
78. SCHMITT, M.C., & GREGORY, A.E. (in press). The impact of an early literacy intervention: Where are the children now? Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing.
79. SCHWARTZ, R.M. (2005). Literacy learning of at-risk first grade students in the Reading Recovery early intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 257-267.
80. SHANAHAN, T., & BARR, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996.
81. STRICKLAND, D.S. (1998). Teaching phonics today: A primer for educators. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
82. STRICKLAND, D.S. (2002). The importance of effective early intervention. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 69-86). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
83. SULZBY, E. (1986). Writing and reading: Signs of oral and written language organization in the young child. In W.H. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. 50-89). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
84. TEALE, W.H. (1986). Home background and young children's literacy development. In W.H. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. 173-206). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
85. TEALE, W.H., & SULZBY, E. (1986). Emergent literacy: Writing and reading. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
86. VYGOTSKY, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
87. VYGOTSKY, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. (Original work published 1934)
88. VYGOTSKY, L.S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). White Plains, NY: Sharpe.
89. WELLS, G. (1981). Learning through interaction: The study of language development. New York: Cambridge University.
90. WOOLSEY, D.P. (1991). Changing contexts for literacy learning: The impact of Reading Recovery on one first-grade teacher. In D.E. DeFord, C.A. Lyons, & G.S. Pinnell (Eds.), Bridges to literacy: Learning from Reading Recovery (pp. 189-203). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.