Disentangling women's responses on complex dietary intake patterns from an Indian cross-sectional survey: A latent class analysis

Public Health Nutrition

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 204-211

  Padmadas, Sabu S ^a   Dias, José G ^b   Willekens, Frans J ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE LISBOA ISCTE IUL   (Portugal)

^c NETHERLANDS INTERDISCIPLINARY DEMOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dietary patterns; India; Latent class model; National Family Health Survey; Unobserved heterogeneity; Women

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DIETARY INTAKE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INDIAN; LEAFY VEGETABLE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; VEGETARIAN DIET;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIET; DIET, VEGETARIAN; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INDIA; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; NUTRITION POLICY; NUTRITION SURVEYS; POVERTY; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 33646491000     PISSN: 13689800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1079/PHN2005842     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Woods SC, Schwartz MW, Baskin DG, Seeley RJ. Food intake and the regulation of body weight. Annual Review of Psychology 2000; 51: 255-77.
2. Kakwani N. On Specifying Poverty Lines. Asia and Pacific Forum on Poverty. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2001.
3. Popkin BM. The shift in stages of the nutrition transition in the developing world differs from past experiences. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 205-14.
4. Shetty PS. Nutrition transition in India. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 175-82.
5. Srinkantia SG. The National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau. Hyderabad: Nutrition Foundation of India, 1998.
6. National Institute of Nutrition. Nutrition in India: UN/ACC/SCN Country Case Study Supported by UNICEF. Hyderabad: National Institute of Nutrition, 1992.
7. Shariff A, Mallick AC. Dynamics of food intake and nutrition by expenditure class in India. Economic and Political Weekly 1999; 34: 1790-800.
8. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-99. Mumbai/Washington, DC: IIPS/ORC Macro, 2000.
9. Reddy KS. Cardiovascular diseases in the developing countries: dimensions, determinants, dynamics and directions for public health action. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 231-7.
10. Hu FB. Diet, lifestyle, and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 345: 790-7.
11. Gopalan C. Diet related non-communicable diseases in South and South East Asia. In: Shetty PS, McPherson K, eds. Diet, Nutrition and Chronic Disease: Lessons from Contrasting Worlds. London: John Wiley & Sons, 1997; 10-23.
12. Chadha SL, Gopinath N, Shekawat S. Urban-rural differences in the prevalence of coronary heart disease and its risk factor in Delhi. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1997; 75: 31-8.
13. Kant AK, Schatzkin A, Ziegler RG. Dietary diversity and subsequent cause-specific mortality in the NHANES I epidemiological follow-up study. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 1995; 14: 233-8.
14. Clogg CC. Latent class models. In: Arminger G, Clogg CC, Sobel ME, eds. Handbook of Statistical Modelling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 14. New York: Plenum, 1995; 233-8.
15. Goodman LA. Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika 1974; 61: 215-31.
16. Patterson BH, Dayton CM, Graubard BI. Latent class analysis of complex survey data: application to dietary data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2002; 97: 721-9.
17. Lazarsfeld PF, Henry NW. Latent Structure Analysis. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1968.
18. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1977; B39: 1-38.
19. McLachlan GJ, Peel D. Finite Mixture Models. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
20. Akaike H. A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automation and Control 1974; 19: 716-23.
21. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 1978; 6: 461-4.
22. Bozdogan H. Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 1987; 52: 345-70.
23. Wedel M, Kamkura W. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
24. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. Latent class models for classification. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2003; 41: 531-7.
25. Dréze J, Sen A. The Political Economy of Hunger. Vol. III. Endemic Hunger. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
26. Achaya KT. Fat Intakes in India. Hyderabad: Nutrition Foundation of India, 1986.
27. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO Nutrition Country Profile of India. Rome: FAO, 1998.
28. Sinha R, Anderson DE, McDonald SS, Greenwald P. Cancer risk and diet in India. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 2003; 49: 222-8.
29. Hatløy A, Torheim LE, Oshaug A. Food variety - a good indicator of nutritional adequacy of the diet? A case study from an urban area in Mali, West Africa. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1998; 52: 891-8.
30. Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Shore AB, Fischler C, Preziosi P, Hercberg S. Diet quality and dietary diversity in France: implications for the French paradox. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1996; 96: 663-9.
31. Griffiths PL, Bentley ME. The nutrition transition is underway in India. Journal of Nutrition 2001; 131: 2692-700.