A distance-based approach for action recommendation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3720 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 425-436

  Trepos, Ronan ^a,b   Salleb, Ansaf ^a   Cordier, Marie Odile ^a   Masson, Véronique ^a   Gascuel, Chantal ^b  

^a CAMPUS DE BEAULIEU   (France)

^b AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

Author keywords

Actionability; Decision support; Generalized Minkowski metrics; Maximally discriminant descriptions; Rule based classifier

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA MINING; DECISION MAKING; REDUNDANCY;

ACTIONABILITY; DECISION SUPPORT; GENERALIZED MINKOWSKI METRICS; MAXIMALLY DISCRIMINANT DESCRIPTIONS; RULE-BASED CLASSIFIER;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646424737     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11564096_41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A. N. Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Peter Buneman and Sushil Jajodia, editors, Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD, pages 207-216. ACM Press, 1993.
2. M.-O. Cordier. SACADEAU: A decision-aid system to improve stream-water quality. ERCIM News. Special issue on Environmental Modelling, (61):35-36, April 2005.
3. B. Duval, A. Salleb, and C. Vrain. Méthodes et mesures d'intérêt pour l'extraction de règles d'exception. Revue des Nouvelles Technologies de l'Information - Mesures de Qualité pour la Fouille de Données RNTI-E-1, pages 119-140, 2004.
4. Y. Elovici and D. Braha. A decision-theoretic approach to data mining. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 33(1):42-51, 2003.
5. Z. He, X. Xu, and S. Deng. Data Mining for Actionable Knowledge: A Survey. ArXiv Computer Science e-prints, January 2005.
6. A. Hutchinson. Metrics on terms and clauses. In ECML, pages 138-145, 1997.
7. M. Ichino and H. Yaguchi. Generalized minkowski metrics for mixed feature-type data analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24(4):698-708, 1994.
8. N. Lavrač, B. Cestnik, D. Gamberger, and P. Flach. Decision support through subgroup discovery: Three case studies and the lessons learned. Machine Learning, 57(1-2):115-143, 2004.
9. C. X. Ling, T. Chen, Q. Yang, and J. Cheng. Mining optimal actions for profitable CRM. In ICDM, pages 767-770, 2002.
10. Bing Liu, Wynne Hsu, and Yiming Ma. Identifying non-actionable association rules. In KDD '01: Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 329-334, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press.
11. D. Malerba, F. Esposito, V. Gioviale, and V. Tamma. Comparing dissimilarity measures in symbolic data analysis. In Joint Conferences on "New Techniques and Technologies for Statistcs" and "Exchange of Technology and Know-how" (ETK-NTTS'01), pages 473-481, 2001.
12. T. M. Mitchell. Generalization as search. Artif. Intell., 18(2):203-226, 1982.
13. G. Piatetsky-Shapiro and C. Matheus. The interestingness of deviations. In AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 25-36, Menlo Park, CA, 1994. AAAI Press.
14. J. R. Quinlan. C4-5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1993.
15. L. De Raedt and W. Van Laer. Inductive constraint logic. In ALT '95: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, pages 80-94, London, UK, 1995. Springer-Verlag.
16. J. Ramon, M. Bruynooghe, and W. Van Laer. Distance measures between atoms. In CompulogNet Area Meeting on Computational Logic and Machine Learing, pages 35-41. University of Manchester, UK, May 1998.
17. Z. W. Ras and L.-S. Tsay. Discovering extended action-rules (system dear). In IIS, pages 293-300, 2003.
18. Z. W. Ras and A. Wieczorkowska. Action-rules: How to increase profit of a company. In PKDD, pages 587-592, 2000.
19. M. Sebag. Delaying the choice of bias: A disjunctive version space approach. In ICML, pages 444-452, 1996.
20. M. Sebag. Distance induction in first order logic. In ILP '97: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, pages 264-272. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
21. A. Silberschatz and A. Tuzhilin. What makes patterns interesting in knowledge discovery systems. IEEE Trans. On Knowledge And Data Engineering, 8:970-974, 1996.
22. L. Torgo. Controlled redundancy in incremental rule learning. In ECML, pages 185-195, 1993.
23. Q. Yang, J. Yin, C. X. Ling, and T. Chen. Postprocessing decision trees to extract actionable knowledge. In ICDM, pages 685-688, 2003.