Trying Saddam Hussein: Teaching international law through an undergraduate mock trial

International Studies Perspectives

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 159-171

  Ambrosio, Thomas ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; International law; Mock trial; Problem based learning

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL LAW;

EID: 33646407593     PISSN: 15283577     EISSN: 15283585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2006.00237.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ambrosio, Thomas. (2004) Bringing Ethnic Conflict into the Classroom: A Student-Centered Simulation of Multiethnic Politics. PS: Political Science and Politics 37:285-289.
2. Burch, Kurt. (2000) A Primer on Problem-Based Learning for International Relations Courses. International Studies Perspectives 1:31-44.
3. Cady, Thomas. (1967) The Moot Court Program at the West Virginia College of Law. West Virginia Law Review 70:40-46.
4. Carlson, J. Lon, and Neil T. Skaggs. (2000) Learning by Trial and Error. Journal of Economic Education 31:145-155.
5. Cooper, Phillip J. (1979) Undergraduate Moot Court: A Simulation for Undergraduate Courses in Public Law. Teaching Political Science 7:105-118.
6. D'Amato, Anthony. (1984/1985) Is International Law Really "Law"? Northwestern University Law Review 75:1293.
7. Gaubatz, John. (1981) Moot Court in the Modern Law School. Journal of Legal Education 31:87-107.
8. Hall, B. Welling. (2003) The Standing of International Law in Undergraduate IR Texts. International Studies Perspectives 4:145-155.
9. Hernandez, Michael V. (1988) In Defense of Moot Court: A Response to "In Praise of Moot Court - Not!" Review of Litigation 17:69-89.
10. Jefferson, Kurt W. (1999) The Bosnian War Crimes Trial Simulation: Teaching Students about the Fuzziness of World Politics and International Law. PS: Political Science and Politics 32:589-592.
11. Knerr, Charles R., and Andrew B. Sommerman. (2001) Bringing the Court into the Undergraduate Classroom: Appellate Simulation in American Colleges. Law and Courts 11:4-8.
12. McIntosh, Daniel. (2001) The Uses and Limits of the Model United Nations in an International Relations Classroom. International Studies Perspectives 2:269-280.
13. Ringel, Lewis S. (2004) Designing a Moot Court: What to Do, What Not to Do, and Suggestions for How to Do It. PS: Political Science and Politics 37:459-465.
14. Ringel, Lewis S., and Daryl R. Fair. (2004) Writing Successful Moot Court Cases for In-Class Simulations. Law and Courts 4:9-17.
15. Shellman, Stephen M. (2001) Active Learning in Comparative Politics: A Mock German Election and Coalition-Formation Simulation. PS: Political Science 34:827-834.
16. Vile, John R., and Thomas R. Van Dervort. (1994) Revitalizing Undergraduate Programs Through Intercollegiate Mock Trial Competition. PS: Political Science and Politics 27:714-717.
17. Wright, Nancy E. (2002) Treading on Tradition: Approaches to Teaching International Relations to the Nontraditional Undergraduate. International Studies Perspectives 3:15-24.