Spatial correspondence between onsets and offsets of stimuli and responses

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 359-377

  Wühr, Peter ^a   Kunde, Wilfried ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 33646371517     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440500334417     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chastain, G., & Cheal, M. (1999). Time course of attention effects with abrupt-onset and offset single- and multiple-element precues. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 411-436.
2. Chastain, G., & Cheal, M. (2001). Attentional capture with various distractor and target types. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 979-990.
3. Craft, J. L., & Simon, J. R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 415-420.
4. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-439.
5. Hommel, B. (1993a). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 208-222.
6. Hommel, B. (1993b). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
7. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
8. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
10. Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 174-207.
11. Müsseler, J., Koch, I., & Wühr, P. (2005). Testing the boundary conditions for processing irrelevant location information: The cross-task Simon effect. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 108-126.
12. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1994). Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychological Research, 56, 144-150.
13. Proctor, R. W., & Wang, H. (1997). Differentiating types of set-level compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 11-37). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14. Simon, J. R., Mewaldt, S. P., Acosta, E., & Hu, J.-M. (1976). Processing auditory information: Interaction of two population stereotypes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 354-358.
15. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
16. Stoffer, T., & Umiltà, C. (1997). Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S-R compatibility and the Simon effect. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 181-208). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
17. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effects of visual onsets and offsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
18. Wang, H., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Stimulus-response compatibility as a function of stimulus code and response modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1201-1217.
19. Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193-205.