Workplaces as communities: The role of social networks in who seeks, gives, and accepts information on justice issues

Journal of Community Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 363-377

  Chio, Ho Beng ^c   Foo, Mow Der ^b   Fang, Piuolion ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646365615     PISSN: 00904392     EISSN: 15206629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jcop.20104     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Ambrose, M.L., & Schminke, M. (2002). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervison,' trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 295-305.
2. Bies, R.J., & Moag, J.S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communications criteria of fairness. Research in Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43-55.
3. Boiger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R.C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953-961.
4. Brass, D.J. (1985). Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 327-343.
5. Burkhardt, M.E. (1994). Social interaction effects following a technological change: A longitudinal investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 869-898.
6. Buunk, B.P., & Verhoeven, K. (1991). Companionship and support at work: A microanalysis of the stress-reducing features of social interaction. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 12, 243-258.
7. Chen, G., & Tjosvold, D. (2002). Conflict management and team effectiveness in China: The mediating role of justice. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 557-572.
8. Clark, M.S. (1984). Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 549-557.
9. Clark, M.S., Mills, J.R., & Corcoran, D.M. (1989). Keeping track of needs and inputs of friends and strangers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 533-542.
10. Degoey, P. (2000). Contagious justice: Exploring the social construction of justice in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 51-102.
11. Deutsch, M. (1983). Current social psychological perspectives on justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 305-319.
12. Exline, J.J., & Lobel, M. (1999). The perils of outperformance: Sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 307-337.
13. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M.A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
14. Fombrun, C.J. (1982). Strategies for network research in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 7, 280-291.
15. Gleason, M.E.J., lida, M., Boiger, N., & Shrout, P.E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036-1045.
16. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
17. Grant, C. (2002). Whistle blowers: Saints of secular culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 391-399.
18. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
19. Greenberg, J., Bies, R.J., & Eskew, D.E. (1991). Establishing fairness in the eyes of the beholder. In A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Applied impression management: How image-making affects managerial decisions (pp. 111-132). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
21. Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 471-501.
22. Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S.B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277-303.
23. Jehn, K.A., & Shah, P.P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790.
24. Jones, D., & Skarlicki, D.P. (2005). The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority's reputation for fairness on reactions to subsequent treatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 363-372.
25. Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R.G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 216-239). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Lamertz, K. (2002). The social construction of fairness: Social influence and sense making in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 19-37.
27. Lind, E.A., Kray, L., & Thompson, L. (1998). The social construction of injustice: Fairness judgments in response to own and others' unfair treatment by authorities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 1-22.
28. Markiewicz, D., Devine, I., & Kausilas, D. (2000). Friendships of women and men at work: Job satisfaction and resource implications. Journal of Management Psychology, 15, 161-184.
29. Marsden, P.V. (1988). Homogeneity in confiding relations. Journal of Social Networks, 10, 57-76.
30. Marsden, P.V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463.
31. McDonald, M., & Westphal, J.D. (2003). Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs' advice networks and firms' strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 1-32.
32. McFarlin, D.B., & Sweeney, P.D. (1996). Does having a say matter only if you get your way? Instrumental and value-expressive effects of employee voice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 289-303.
33. Meyer, G.W. (1994). Social information processing and social networks: A test of social influence mechanisms. Human Relations, 47, 1013-1047.
34. Morrison, E.W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 557-589.
35. Morrison, E.W. (2002). Newcomers' relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1149-1160.
36. Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240-267.
37. Rice, R.E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes towards new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social influence processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219-224.
38. Sarason, I.G., Sarason, B.R., & Pierce, G.R. (1994). Relationship-specific social support: Toward a model for the analysis of supportive interaction. In B.R. Burleson, T.L. Albrecht, & I.G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 91-112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Shah, P.P. (1998). Who are employees' social referents? Using a network perspective to determine referent others. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 249-268.
40. Tata, J., Fu, P.P., & Wu, R. (2003). An examination of procedural justice principles in China and in the U.S. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20, 205-216.
41. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-192.
42. Umphress, E., Labianca, G., Brass, D., Kass, E., & Scholten, L. (2003). The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees' perceptions of organizational justice. Organization Science, 14, 738-753.
43. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67.
44. Uzzi, B. (1999). Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relationships and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review, 64, 481-505.
45. Van den Bos, K., Bruins, J., Wilke, H.A.M., & Dronkert, E. (1999). Sometimes unfair procedures have nice aspects: On the psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 324-337.