Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn infants: Effects of ear asymmetry, gender, and age

Journal of Otolaryngology

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 133-138

  Saitoh, Yuko ^a   Sakoda, Takema ^b   Hazama, Michio ^c   Funakoshi, Hiroko ^b   Ikeda, Hiroki ^c   Shibano, Akira ^c   Yajin, Shinji ^c   Yoda, Shigetoshi ^c   Dake, Yoshihiro ^c   Enomoto, Tadao ^c   Kitano, Hiroya ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL RESEARCH   (Japan)

^b TOTTORI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c SUWA RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Gender; Hearing screening; Interaural; Newborn; Transient evoked otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; MALE; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; NEWBORN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGE FACTORS; EAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 33646363369     PISSN: 03816605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7070.2005.4127     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Joint Commitee on Infant Hearing. Position statement 1994. ASHA 1994;36:38-41.
2. Hall JW III. Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions in children. In: Hall JW III, editor. Handbook of otoacoustic emissions. San Diego (CA): Singular; 2000. p. 389-435.
3. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;64:1386-91.
4. Kemp DT. Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1979;224:37-45.
5. Prieve BA. Otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening. In: Robinete MS, Glattke TJ, editors. Otoacoustic emissions: clinical applications. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2000. p. 348-74.
6. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990;11:93-105.
7. Driscoll C, Kei J, Murdoch B, et al. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in two-month-old infants: a normative study. Audiology 1999;38:181-6.
8. Newmark M, Merlob P, Bresloff M, et al. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions: inter-aural and gender differences in newborns. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 1997;8:133-9.
9. Kemp DT. Exploring cochlear status with otoacoustic emissions. In: Robinette MS, Glattke TJ, editors. Otoacoustic emissions: clinical applications. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2002. p. 1-47.
10. Kemp DT. Developments in cochlear mechanics and techniques for non-invasive evaluation. Adv Audiol 1988;5:25-45.
11. Keogh T, Kei J, Driscoll C, et al. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren: effects of ear asymmetry, handedness, and gender. J Am Acad Audiol 2001;12:506-13.
12. Bilger RC, Matthies ML, Hammel DR, et al. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1990;33:418-32.
13. Burns EM, Arehart KH, Campbell SL. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;91:1571-5.
14. Morlet T, Lapillonne A, Ferber C, et al. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates: prevalence and gender effects. Hear Res 1995;90:44-54.
15. Lamprecht-Dinnesen A, Pohl M, Hartmann S, et al. Effects of age, gender and ear side on SOAE parameters in infancy and childhood. Audiol Neurotol 1998;3:386-401.
16. Kei J, McPherson B, Smyth V, et al. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants: effects of gender, ear asymmetry and activity status. Audiology 1997;36:61-71.
17. Driscoll C, Kei J, Murdoch B, et al. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in two-month-old infants: a normative study. Audiology 1999;38:181-6.
18. Cassidy JW, Ditty KM. Gender differences among newborns on a transient otoacoustic emissions test for hearing. J Music Ther Assoc 2001;38:28-35.
19. Bowman DM, Brown DK, Kimberley BP. An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults. Hear Res 2000;142:1-11.
20. Velenovsky DS, Glattke TJ. Contralateral and binaural suppression of otoacoustic emission. In: Robinette MS, Glattke TJ, editors. Otoacoustic emissions: clinical applications. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2002. p. 163-89.
21. Barham WT, Berlin CI, Hood LJ, et al. Gender and ear differences in binaural, contralateral and ipsilateral efferent suppression of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. St. Petersburg (FL): Association for Research in Otolaryngology; 1995.
22. Bright KE. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. In: Robinette MS, Glattke TJ, editors. Otoacoustic emissions: clinical applications. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2002. p. 74-94.
23. Morlet T, Perrin E, Durrant JD, et al. Development of cochlear active mechanisms in humans differs between genders. Neurosci Lett 1996;220:49-52.
24. Sato H, Sando J, Takahashi H. Sexual dimorphism and development of the human cochlea: computer 3-D measurement. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991;111:1037-40.
25. Wright A, Davis A, Bredberry G, et al. Hair cell distribution in the normal human cochlea: a report of a European working group. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1987;106:15-24.
26. Don M, Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, et al. Gender differences in cochlear response time: an explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:2135-48.
27. McFadden D, Pasanen EG. Comparison of the auditory systems of heterosexuals and homosexuals: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:2709-13.
28. McFadden D, Loehlin JC. On the heritability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: a twins study. Hear Res 1995;86:181-98.
29. Royster LH, Royster JD, Thomas WG. Representative hearing level by race and sex in North Carolina industry. J Acoust Soc Am 1980;68:551-66.
30. Khalfa S, Collet L. Functional asymmetry of medial olivocochlear system in humans. Towards a peripheral auditory lateralization. Neuroreport 1996;7:993-6.
31. Levine PA, Liedeman J, Riley P. The brainstem auditory evoked potential asymmetry is replicable and reliable. Neuropsychologia 1988;26:603-14.
32. Pinkerton F, Waston DR, McClelland RJ. A neurophysiological study of children with reading, writing and spelling difficulties. Dev Med Child Neurol 1989;31:569-81.
33. Chatrian GE, Wirch AL, Edwards KH, et al. Cochlear summating potential to broadband clicks detected from the human external auditory meatus. A study of subjects with normal hearing for age. Ear Hear 1985;6:130-8.
34. Johnson DW, Sherman RE. Normal development and ear effect for contralateral acoustic reflex in children six to twelve years old. Dev Med Child Neurol 1979;21:572-81.
35. Khalfa S, Micheyl C, Pham E, et al. Tones disappear faster in the right ear than in the left. Percept Psychophys 2000;62:647-55.
36. Thornton AR, Kimm L, Kennedy CR. Methodological factors involved in neonatal screening using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response testing. Hear Res 2003;182:65-76.