Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants: Effects of gender, ear asymmetry and activity status

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 61-71

  Kei, Joseph ^a   McPherson, Bradley ^a   Smyth, Veronica ^a   Latham, Simon ^b   Loscher, Jennifer ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community health; Hearing screening; Infants; Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; GENDER; HEARING; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; MASS SCREENING; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; NOISE; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 0030895820     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206099709071961     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–2067
2. Bray P, Kemp D. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191–204
3. Bonfils P, Dumont A, Marie P, Francois M, Narcy P. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 186–189
4. Johnson M J, Maxon A B, White K R, Vohr B R. Operating a hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Sem Hear 1993; 14: 46–56
5. Maxon A B, White K R, Vohr B R, Behrens T R. Using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for neonatal hearing screening. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 149–153
6. Schorn K. The Munich screening programme in neonates. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 143–148
7. White K R, Vohr B R, Behrens T R. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Project. Sem Hear 1993; 14: 18–29
8. White K R, Vohr B R, Maxon A B, Behrens T R, McPherson M G, Mauk G W. Screening all newborns for hearing loss using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 29: 203–217
9. Kok M R, Van Zanten G A, Brocaar M P, Wallenburg H CS. Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in 1036 ears of healthy newborns. Audiology 1993; 32: 213–224
10. Meredith R, Stephens D, Hogan S, Cartlidge P HT, Drayton M. Screening for hearing loss in an at-risk neonatal population using evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1994; 23: 187–193
11. Maxon A B, White K R, Behrens T R, Vohr B R. Referral rates and cost efficiency in a universal newborn hearing screening program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6: 271–277
12. Salamy A, Eldredge L, Sweetow R. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: feasibility in the nursery. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 42–48
13. Bonfils P, Uziel A, Pujol M. Screening for auditory dysfunction in infants by evoked otoacoustic emissions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114: 887–890
14. Stevens J C, Webb H D, Hutchinson J, Connell J, Smith M F, Buffin J T. Click evoked otoacoustic emission in neonatal screening. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 128–133
15. Hunter M F, Kimm L, Cafarelli Dees D, Kennedy C R, Thornton A RD. Feasibility of otoacoustic emission detection followed by ABR as a universal neonatal screening test for hearing impairment. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 47–51
16. Kok M R, Van Zanten G A, Brocaar M P, Jongejan H TM. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in very-low-birth-weight infants: a cross-sectional data analysis. Audiology 1994; 33: 152–164
17. Vohr B R, White K R, Maxon AB, Johnson M J. Factors affecting the interpretation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission results in neonatal hearing screening. Sem Hear 1993; 14: 57–72
18. Jacobson J T, Jacobson C A. The effects of noise in transient EOAE newborn hearing screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 29: 235–248
19. Hall J W, Baer J E, Chase P A, Schwaber M K. Clinical application of otoacoustic emissions: what do we know about factors influencing measurements and analysis'. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 110: 22–38
20. Moulin A, Collet L, Veuillet E, Morgon A. Interrelation between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects. Hear Res 1993; 65: 216–23321
21. Bilger R C, Matthies M L, Hammel D R, Demorest M E. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 418–43222
22. Burns E M, Arehart K H, Campbell S L. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1571–1575
23. Kemp D T, Ryan S. The use of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening programs. Sem Hear 1993; 14: 30–45