The remaking of an American senate: The 17th Amendment ideological responsiveness

Journal of Politics

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 345-357

  Bernhard, William ^a   Sala, Brian R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646358519     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: 14682508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00411.x     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Ahuja, Sunil. 1994. "Electoral Status and Representation in the United States Senate: Does Temporal Proximity to Elections Matter?" Amerian Politics Quarterly 22 (1): 104-18.
2. Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy of Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3. Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder, Jr., and Charles Stewart III. 2001. "Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections." American Jounal of Political Science 45 (1): 136-59.
4. Aranson, Peter H., and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1972. "Spatial Strategies for Sequential Elections." In Probability Models of Collective Decision Making, eds. Richard G. Niemi and Herbert P. Weisberg. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Co., pp. 298-331.
5. Bernstein, Robert A. 1991a. "Strategic Shifts - Safeguarding the Public Interest - United States Senators, 1971-86." Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (2): 263-80.
6. Bernstein, Robert A. 1991b. "Ideological Deviation and Support for Reelection: Party Differences in Senate Races." Western Politics Quarterly 44 (4): 987-1003.
7. Bernstein, Jeffrey L., and Jennifer Wolak. 2002. "A Bicameral Perspective on Legislative Retirement: The Case of the Senate." Political Research Quarterly 5 (2): 375-90.
8. Brady, David W. 1973. Congressional Voting in a Partisan Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
9. Burnham, W. Dean. 1996. "Partisan Division of American State Governments, 1834-1985." ICPSR Study 16. Ann Arbor: InterUniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.
10. Cooper, Joseph, and Elizabeth Rybicki. 2002. "Analyzing Institutional Change: Bill Introduction in the Nineteenth-Century Senate." In U.S. Senate Exceptionalism, ed. Bruce Oppenheimer. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 182-211.
11. Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Serret; The Cabinet an the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequence of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Crook, Sara Brandes, and John R. Hibbing. 1997. "A Not-so-distant Mirror: The 17th Amendment and Congressional Change." American Political Science Review 91 (4): 845-53.
14. Dixon, Robert G. Jr. 1950. "Electoral College Procedure." Western Political Quarterly 3: 214-24.
15. Elling, Richard C. 1982. "Ideological Change in the U.S. Senate: Time and Electoral Responsiveness." Legislative Studies Quarterly 7 (1): 75-92.
16. Ellis, Susan, and Ronald P. King. 1999. "Inter-Party Advantage and Intra-Party Diversity: A Response to Wirls." Studies in American Political Development 13: 31-45.
17. Engstrom, Erik, and Sam Kernell. 2003. "The Effects of Presidential Elections on Party Control of the Senate Under Indirect and Direct Elections." Paper presented at the History of Congress Conference, UCSD, La Jolla.
18. Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1996. Senators on the Campaign Trail: The Politics of Representation. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
19. Forgette, Richard, and Brian R. Sala. 1999. "Conditional Party Government And Member Turnout On Senate Recorded Votes, 1873-1935." Journal of Politics 61 (2): 467-84.
20. Fredman, L. E. 1968. The Australian Ballot: The Story of an American Reform. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
21. Greene, William. 2003. Econometric Analysis, 5th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. Groseclose, Tim, Steven D. Levitt, and James M. Snyder. 1999. "Comparing Interest Group Scores Across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress." American Political Science Review 93 (1): 33-50.
23. Haynes, George H. 1938. The Senate of the United States: Its History and Practice, Volume II. Reprint. New York: Russell and Russell. 1960.
24. Heckman, J. 1979. "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error." Econometrica 47:153-61.
25. Herron, Michael, and Kenneth W. Shotts. 2003. "Using Ecological Inference Point Estimates as Dependent Variables in Second Stage Linear Regressions." Political Analysis 11 (1): 44-64.
26. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) and Carroll McKibbin. 1997. "Roster of United States Congressional Officeholders and Biographical Characteristics of Members of the United States Congress, 1789-1996: Merged Data." ICPSR Study 7803. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
27. Jewell, Malcolm E., and David M. Olson. 1988. Political Parties and Elections in American States, Chicago: Dorsey Press.
28. King, Ronald F., and Susan Ellis. 1996. "Partisan Advantage and Constitutional Change: The Case of the Seventeenth Amendment." Studies in American Political Development 10: 69-102.
29. Levitt, Steven D. 1996. "How Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senator Ideology." American Economic Review 86 (3): 425-41.
30. Lewis, Jeffery B., and Keith T. Poole. 2004. "Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap." Political Analysis 12 (2): 105-27.
31. Lipsey, Mark W., and David B. Wilson. 2001. Practical MetaAnalysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series No. 49. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
32. Mayer, George H. 1967. The Republican Party: 1854-1966. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz. 1988. "Congress, the Courts, and Public Policy: Consequences of the One-Man, One-Vote Rule." American Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 388-415.
34. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997a. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997b. "Multidimensional Weighted Nominal Three-Step Estimation." Software. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University. Downloaded from http://voteview.uh.edu/W-Nominate. htm.
36. Reiter, Howard L. 1998. "The Bases of Progressivism within the Major Parties: Evidence from the National Conventions." Social Science History 22(1): 83-116.
37. Riker, William H. 1955. "The Senate and American Federalism." American Political Science Review 49 (2): 452-69.
38. Schiller, Wendy J. 2000. Partners and Rivals: Representation in U.S. Senate Delegations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39. Schiller, Wendy. 2003. "Climbing and Clawing Their Way to the U.S. Senate: Political Ambition and Career Building 1880-1913." Paper presented at the History of Congress Conference, UCSD, La Jolla.
40. Silbey, Joel. 1991. The American Political Nation, 1838-1893. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
41. Stewart, Charles III. 1992. "Responsiveness in the Upper Chamber: The Constitution and the Institutional Development of the Senate." In The Constitution and American Political Development: An Institutional Perspective, ed. Peter Nardulli. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 63-96.
42. Stratmann, Thomas. 2000. "Congressional Voting over Legislative Careers: Shifting Positions and Changing Constraints." American Political Science Review 94 (3): 665-76.
43. Thomas, Martin. 1985. "Election Proximity and Senatorial Roll-Call Voting." American Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 96-111.
44. Wirls, Daniel. 1999a. "Regionalism, Rotten Boroughs, Race and Realignment: The Seventeenth Amendment and the Politics of Representation." Studies in American Political Development 13: 1-30.
45. Wirls, Daniel. 1999b. "Beyond Bias: A Rejoinder to Ellis and King." Studies in American Political Development 13: 46-49.
46. Wood, B. Dan, and Angela Hinton Andersson. 1998. "The Dynamics of Senatorial Representation, 1952-1991." Journal of Politics 60 (3): 705-36.
47. Wooldridge, Jeffery. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
48. Wright, Gerald C., and Michael B. Berkman. 1986. "Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections." American Political Science Review 80 (2): 567-88.