Empirical corn yield loss estimation from common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) in mixed communities

Weed Science

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 386-393

  Moechnig, Michael J ^a   Stoltenberg, David E ^a   Boerboom, Chris M ^a   Binning, Larry K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Light interception; Weed growth; Weed crop interactions

Indexed keywords

CROP PRODUCTION; CROP YIELD; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; LEAF AREA; MAIZE; POPULATION DENSITY; WEED;

CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; SETARIA (PLANT); SETARIA FABERI; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33646343726     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0386:ECYLEF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bussler, B. H., B. D. Maxwell, and K. Puettmann. 1995. Using plant volume to quantify interference in corn (Zea mays) neighborhoods Weed Sci. 43:586-594.
2. Campbell, G. S. 1981. Fundamentals of radiation and temperature relations. Pages 11-40 in O. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond, and H. Ziegler, eds. Physiological Plant Ecology I; Responses to the Physical Environment. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Campbell, G. S. and J. M. Norman. 1998. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 247-276.
4. Chikoye, D., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Influence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) time of emergence and density on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 43:375-380.
5. Colquhoun, J., D. E. Stoltenberg, L. K. Binning, and C. M. Boerboom. 2001. Phenology of common lambsquarters growth parameters. Weed Sci. 49:177-183.
6. Conley, S. P., L. K. Binning, C. M. Boerboom, and D. E. Stoltenberg. 2002. Estimating giant foxtail cohort productivity in soybean based on weed density, leaf area, or volume. Weed Sci. 50:72-78.
7. Connolly, J. and P. Wayne. 1996. Asymmetric competition between plant species. Oecologia 108:311-320.
8. Cousens, R. 1986. A simple model related yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239-252.
9. Cousens, R., P. Brain, J. T. O'Donovan, and P. A. O'Sullivan. 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci. 35: 720-725.
10. Cowan, P., S. E. Weaver, and C. J. Swanton. 1998. Interference between pigweed (Amaranthus spp.), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 46:533-539.
11. Dieleman, A., A. S. Hamill, S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Empirical models of pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 43:612-618.
12. Draper, N. R. and H. Smith. 1998. Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 33-76.
13. Fausey, J. C., J. J. Kells, S. M. Swinton, and K. A. Renner. 1997. Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) interference in nonirrigated corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 45:256-260.
14. France, J. and J.H.T. Thornley. 1984. Mathematical Models in Agriculture. London: Butterworths. pp. 80-82.
15. Graf, B., A. P. Gutierrez, O. Rakotobe, P. Zahner, and V. Delucchi. 1990. A simulation model for the dynamics of rice growth and development: Part II-The competition with weeds for nitrogen and light. Agric. Syst. 32:367-392.
16. Gunst, R. F. and R. L. Mason. 1980. Regression Analysis and its Application: A Data-Oriented Approach. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 223-229.
17. Harrison, S. K., J. T. Schmoll, and J. E. Webb. 2001. Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci. 49:224-229.
18. Hunt, R. 1982. Plant Growth Curves: The Functional Approach to Plant Growth Analysis. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press. pp. 128-135.
19. Jasieniuk, M., B. D. Maxwell, R. L. Anderson, et al. 1999. Site-to-site and year-to-year variation in Triticum aestivum-Aegilops cylindrica interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:529-537.
20. Knezevic, S. Z., M. J. Horak, and R. L. Vanderlip. 1997. Relative time of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) emergence is critical in pigweed-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] competition. Weed Sci. 45:502-508.
21. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Comparison of empirical models depicting density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and relative leaf area as predictors of yield loss in maize (Zea mays L.). Weed Res. 35:207-214.
22. Kropff, M. J. 1993. Mechanisms of competition for light. Pages 33-60 in M. J. Kropff and H. H. van Laar, eds. Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions. Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International.
23. Kropff, M. J., L.A.P. Lotz, S. E. Weaver, H. J. Bos, J. Wallinga, and T. Migo. 1995. A two parameter model for prediction of crop loss by weed competition from early observations of relative leaf area of the weeds. Ann. Appl. Biol. 126:329-346.
24. Kropff, M. J. and C.J.T. Spitters. 1991. A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of the weeds. Weed Res. 31:97-105.
25. Lindquist, J. L. 2001. Mechanisms of crop loss due to weed competition. Pages 233-253 in R.K.D. Peterson and L. G. Higley, eds. Biotic Stress and Yield Loss. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
26. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, S. A. Clay, R. Schmenk, J. Kells, K. Howatt, and P. Westra. 1996. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 44:309-313.
27. Lindquist, J. L, D. A. Mortensen, P. Westra, et al. 1999. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-foxtail (Setaria spp.) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:195-200.
28. Lotz, L.A.P., S. Christensen, D. Cloutier, et al. 1996. Prediction of the competitive effects of weeds on crop yields based on the relative leaf area of weeds. Weed Res. 36:93-101.
29. Mashingaidze, A. B. 1990. Comparison of Leaf Area Expansion Rates in Four Crops and Seven Weeds Under Two Temperature Regimes. M.S. thesis. Iowa Sate University, Ames, IA. pp. 32-34.
30. Massinga, R. A., R. S. Currie, M. J. Horak, and J. Boyer, Jr. 2001. Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci. 49:202-208.
31. Moechnig, M. J. 2001. Characterization of Common Lambsquarters and Giant Foxtail Communities and Their Influence on Corn-Yield Loss. M.S. thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 69 p.
32. Ngouajio, M., C. Lemieux, and G. D. Leroux. 1999. Prediction of corn (Zea mays) yield loss from early observations of the relative leaf area and the relative leaf cover of weeds. Weed Sci. 47:297-304.
33. Radosevich, S., J. Holt, and C. Ghersa. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 163-301.
34. Seibert, A. C. and R. B. Pearce. 1993. Growth analysis of weed and crop species with reference to seed weight. Weed Sci. 41:52-56.
35. Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, pp. 252-253.
36. Swinton, S. M., D. D. Buhler, F. Forcella, J. F. Gunsolus, and R. P. King. 1994. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Sci. 42:103-109.
37. Van Acker, R. C., P. J. Lutman, and R. J. Fraud-Williams. 1997. Predicting yield loss due to interference from two weed species using early observations of relative weed leaf area. Weed Res. 37:287-299.
38. Weaver, S. E. 1991. Size-dependant economic thresholds for three broadleaf weed species in soybeans. Weed Technol. 5:674-679.
39. Wiederholt, R. J. and D. E. Stoltenberg. 1996. Absence of differential fitness between giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) accessions resistant and susceptible to acetyl-coenzyme a carboxylase inhibitors. Weed Sci. 44:18-24.