Phenology of common lambsquarters growth parameters

Weed Science

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 177-183

  Colquhoun, Jed ^a,b   Stoltenberg, David E ^a   Binning, Larry K ^a   Boerboom, Chris M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CHEAL; Weed biology; Weed ecology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043083489     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0177:POCLGP]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alm, D. M., M. E. McGifFen, Jr., and J. D. Hesketh. 1991. Weed phenology. Pages 191-218 in T. Hodges, ed. Predicting Crop Phenology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
2. Aim, D. M., D. R. Pike, J. D. Hesketh, and E. W. Stoller. 1988. Leaf area development in some crop and weed species. Biotronics 17:9-39.
3. Bhowmik, P. C. 1997. Weed biology: importance to weed management. Weed Sci. 45:349-356.
4. Bussler, B. H., B. D. Maxwell, and K. Puettmann. 1995. Using plant volume to quantify interference in corn (Zea mays) neighborhoods. Weed Sci. 43:586-594.
5. Caton, B. P., T. C. Foin, and J. E. Hill. 1997. Phenotypic plasticity of Ammannia spp. in competition with rice. Weed Res. 37:33-38.
6. Cousens, R. 1985a. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239-252.
7. Cousens, R. 1985b. An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models. J. Agric. Sci. 105:513-521.
8. Cousens, R., P. Brain, J. T. O'Donovan, and P. A. O'Sullivan. 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci. 35: 720-725.
9. Cousens, R., S. E. Weaver, J. R. Porter, J. M. Rooney, D. R. Butler, and M. P. Johnson. 1992. Growth and development of Avena fatua (Wildoat) in the field. Ann. Appl. Biol. 120:339-351.
10. Deen, W., T. Hunt, and C. J. Swanton. 1998a. Influence of temperature, photoperiod, and irradiance on the phenological development of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia). Weed Sci. 46:555-560.
11. Deen, W., T. Hunt, and C. J. Swanton. 1998b. Photothermal time describes common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) phenological development and growth. Weed Sci. 46:561-568.
12. Dekker, J. 1997. Weed diversity and weed management. Weed Sci. 45: 357-363.
13. Devore, J. and R. Peck. 1993. Statistics: The Exploration and Analysis of Data. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. pp. 691-706.
14. Forcella, F., R. G. Wilson, K. A. Renner, J. Dekker, R. G. Harvey, D. A. Alm, D. D. Buhler, and J. Cardina. 1992. Weed seed banks of the U.S. corn belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Sci. 40:636-644.
15. Ghersa, C. M. and J. S. Holt. 1995. Using phenology prediction in weed management: a review. Weed Res. 35:461-470.
16. Holm, L. G., D. L. Plucknett, J. V. Pancho, and J. P. Herberger. 1977. Chenopodium album L. Chenopodiaceae, goosefoot family. Pages 84-91 in The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Ecology. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii.
17. Kilkenny, Z. A. 1995. Emergence and Growth of Common Annual Weeds Under Varied Levels of Shade. M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 92 pp.
18. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1994. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Res. 35:207-214.
19. Knezevic, S. A., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Comparison of empirical models depicting density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and relative leaf area as predictors of yield loss in maize (Zea mays L.). Weed Res. 35:207-214.
20. Kropff, M. J. and C.J.T. Spitters. 1991. A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of weeds. Weed Res. 31:97-105.
21. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, P. Westra, et al. 1999. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-foxtail (Setaria spp.) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:195-200.
22. Lotz, L.A.P., S. Christensen, D. Cloutier, et al. 1996. Prediction of the competitive effects of weeds on crop yields based on relative leaf area of weeds. Weed Res. 36:93-101.
23. Morgan, D. C. and H. Smith. 1981. Control of development in Chenopodium album L. by shadelight: the effect of light quantity (total fluence rate) and light quality (red : far-red ratio). New Phytol. 88:239-248.
24. Mulugeta, D. and D. E. Stoltenberg. 1998. Influence of cohorts on Chenopodium album demography. Weed Sci. 46:65-70.
25. Ngouajio, M., C. Lemieux, and G. D. Leroux. 1999. Prediction of corn (Zea mays) yield loss from early observations of the relative leaf area and the relative leaf cover of weeds. Weed Sci. 47:297-304.
26. Parks, R. J., W. S. Curran, G. W. Roth, N. L. Hartwig, and D. D. Calvin. 1995. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control in corn (Zea mays) with postemergence herbicides and cultivation. Weed Technol. 9:728-735.
27. Patterson, D. T. 1992. Temperature and canopy development of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6:68-76.
28. Schlichting, C. D. 1989. Phenotypic plasticity in Phlox. II. Plasticity of character correlations. Oecologia 78:496-501.
29. Sibuga, K. P. and J. D. Bandeen. 1980. Effects of green foxtail and lamb'squarters interference in field corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60:1419-1425.
30. Siebert, A. C. and R. B. Pearce. 1993. Growth analysis of weed and crop species with reference to seed weight. Weed Sci. 41:52-56.
31. Wall, D. A. and I. N. Morrison. 1990. Phenological development and biomass allocation in Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke. Weed Res. 30: 279-288.