Mechanisms of crop loss due to weed competition

Biotic Stress and Yield Loss

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 233-253

  Lindquist, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32644450097     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420040753     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Barbour, M. G., Burk, J. H., and Pitts, W. D., Terrestrial Plant Ecology, Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, 1987, chaps. 6 and 7.
2. Goldberg, D. E., Components of resource competition in plant communities, in Perspectives on Plant Competition, Grace, J. B., and Tilman D., Eds., Academic Press, San Diego, 1990, chap. 3.
3. Radosevich, S., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C., Weed Ecology: Implications for Management, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997, chaps. 5 and 6.
4. Holt, J. S., Plant responses to light: a potential for weed management, Weed Sci., 43, 474, 1995.
5. DiTomaso, J. M., Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through manipulation of fertilization strategies, Weed Sci., 43, 491, 1995.
6. Kropff, M. J., and van Laar, H. H., Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions, CAB International and the International Rice Research Institute, Wallingford, 1993, chaps. 4 to 6.
7. Patterson, D. T., Methodology and terminology for the measurement of light in weed studies- a review, Weed Sci., 27, 437, 1979.
8. Patterson, D. T., Comparative ecophysiology of weeds and crops, in Weed Physiology, Volume I, Reproduction and Ecophysiology, Duke, S. O., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1985, chap. 4.
9. Patterson, D. T., Effects of environmental stress on weed/crop interactions, Weed Sci., 43, 483, 1995.
10. Aphalo, P. J., and Ballare, C. L., On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant-plant interactions, Functional Ecol., 9, 5, 1995.
11. Lindquist, J. L., unpublished data, 1994.
12. Grace, J. B., On the relationship between plant traits and competitive ability, in Perspectives on Plant Competition, Grace, J. B., and Tilman D., Eds., Academic Press, San Diego, 1990, chap. 4.
13. Grace, J. B., A clarification of the debate between Grime and Tilman, Functional Ecol., 5, 583, 1991.
14. Grime, J. P., Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes, Wiley, London, 1979.
15. Tilman, D., Resource Competition and Community Structure, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1982.
16. Tilman, D., Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1988.
17. Tilman, D., Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition, in Perspectives on Plant Competition, Grace, J. B., and Tilman D., Eds., Academic Press, San Diego, 1990, chap. 7.
18. Caldwell, R. M., Pachepsky, Y. A., and Timlin, D. J., Current research status on growth modeling in intercropping, in Dynamics of Roots and Nitrogen in Cropping Systems of the Semi-arid Tropics, Ito, O., Johansen, C., Adu-Gyamfi, J. J., Katayama, K., Kumar Rao, J. V. D. K., and Rego, T. J., Eds., Japan International Center for Agricultural Sciences, 1996, 617.
19. Boote, K. J., and Loomis, R. S., The prediction of canopy assimilation, in Modeling Crop Photosynthesis - From Biochemistry to Canopy, Crop Science Society of America Special Publication No., 19, Madison, WI, 1991, chap. 7.
20. Kropff, M. J., Mechanisms of competition for light, in Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions, Kropff, M. J., and van Laar, H. H., Eds., CAB International and the International Rice Research Institute, Wallingford, 1993, chap. 4.
21. Amthor, J. S., The role of maintenance respiration in plant growth, Plant Cell Envir., 7, 561, 1984.
22. Penning deVries, F. W. T., Brunsting, A. H. M., and van Laar, H. H., Products, requirements, and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach, J. Theor. Biol., 45, 339, 1974.
23. Ryel, R., Barnes, P. W., Beyschlag, W., Caldwell, M. M., and Flint, S. D., Plant competition for light analyzed with a multispecies canopy model. I. Model development andinfluence of enhanced UV-B conditions on photosynthesis in mixed wheat and wild oat canopies, Oecologia, 82, 304, 1990.
24. Graf, B., Gutierrez, A. P., Rakotobe, O., Zahner, P., and Delucchi, W., A simulation model for the dynamics of rice growth and development: Part I-The carbon balance, Agric. Syst., 32, 341, 1990.
25. Rimmington, G. M., A model of the effect of interspecies competition for light on drymatter production, Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 11, 277, 1984.
26. Wiles, L. J., and Wilkerson, G. G., Modeling competition for light between soybeans and broadleaf weeds, Agric. Syst., 35, 37, 1991.
27. Kropff, M. J., Modelling the effects of weeds on crop production, Weed Res., 28, 465, 1988.
28. Spitters, C. J. T., and Aerts, R., Simulation of competition for light and water in crop-weed associations, Aspects Appl. Biol., 4, 467, 1983.
29. Kiniry, J. R., Williams, J. R., Gassman, P. W., and Debaeke, P., A general, process-oriented model for two competing plant species, Trans. ASAE, 35, 801, 1992.
30. Flenet, R., Kiniry, J. R., Board, J. E., Westgate, M. E., and Reicosky, D. C., Row spacing effects on light extinction coefficients of corn, sorghum, soybean and sunflower, Agron. J., 88, 185, 1996.
31. Lindquist, J. L., and Mortensen, D. A., A simulation approach to identifying the mechanisms of maize tolerance to velvetleaf competition for light, in Proceedings 1997 Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds, Brighton, U.K., 1997, 503.
32. Caton, B. P., Foin, T. C., and Hill, J. E., A plant growth model for integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice, III. Interspecific competition for light, Field Crops Res., 63, 47, 1999.
33. Lindquist, J. L., and Mortensen, D. A., Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids, Weed Sci., 46, 569, 1998.
34. Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., and Johnson, B. E., Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability, Agron. J., 90, 787, 1998.
35. McLachlan, S. M., Tollenaar, M., Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F., Effect of corn-induced shading on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and architecture of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Weed Sci., 41, 568, 1993.
36. Murphy, S. D., Yakubu, Y., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J., Effect of planting patterns and inter-row cultivation on competition between corn (Zea mays) and late emerging weeds, Weed Sci., 44, 856, 1996.
37. Loomis, R. S., and Connor, D. J., Crop Ecology: Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 1992.
38. Kropff, M. J., Mechanisms of competition for water, in Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions, Kropff, M. J., and van Laar, H. H., Eds., CAB International and the International Rice Research Institute, Wallingford, 1993, chap. 5.
39. Campbell, G. S., Simulation of water uptake by plant roots, in Modeling Plant and Soil Systems, Hanks, J., and Ritchie, J. T., Eds., American Society of Agronomy Special Publication No., 31, Madison, WI, 1991, chap. 12.
40. Swaney, D. P., Jones, J. W., Boggess, W. G., Wilkerson, G. G., and Mishoe, J. W., Realtime irrigation decision analysis using simulation, Trans. ASAE, 26, 562, 1983.
41. Penning de Vries, F. W. T., Jansen, D. M., ten Berge, H. F. M., and Bakema, H., Simulation of ecophysiological processes of growth in several annual crops, Simulation monographs 29, International Rice Research Institute and Pudoc, Wageningen, 1989
42. Penman, H. L., Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass, Proc. R. Soc. London, Series A, 193, 120, 1948.
43. Doorenbos, J., and Kassam, A. H., Yield response to water, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, FAO, Rome, 1979.
44. Ray, J. D., and Sinclair, T. R., Stomatal closure of maize hybrids in response to drying soil, Crop Sci., 37, 803, 1998.
45. Moreshet, S., Bridges, D. C., NeSmith, D. S., and Huang, B., Effects of water deficit stress on competitive interaction of peanut and sicklepod, Agron. J., 88, 636, 1996.
46. Makino, A., and Osmond, B., Effects of nitrogen nutrition on nitrogen partitioning between chloroplasts and mitochondria in pea and wheat, Plant Physiol., 96, 355, 1991.
47. Sage, R. F., and Pearcy, R. W., The nitrogen use efficiency of C3 and C4 plants. II. Leaf nitrogen effects on the gas exchange characteristics of Chenopodium album and Amaranthus retroflexus, Plant Physiol., 84, 958, 1987.
48. Hikosaka, K., and Terashima, I., A model of the acclimation of photosynthesis in the leaves of C3 plants to sun and shade with respect to nitrogen use, Plant, Cell & Environ., 18, 605, 1995.
49. Sinclair, T. R., and Horie, T., Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency:a review, Crop Sci., 29, 90, 1989.
50. Muchow, R. C., Effects of leaf nitrogen and water regime on the photosynthetic capacity of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) under field conditions, Aust. J. Agric. Res., 41, 845, 1990.
51. Sage, R. F., and Pearcy, R. W., The nitrogen use efficiency of C3 and C4 plants. I. Leaf nitrogen, growth, and biomass partitioning in Chenopodium album and Amaranthus retroflexus, Plant Physiol., 84, 954, 1987.
52. Sage, R. F., Sharkey, T. D., and Pearcy, R. W., The effect of leaf nitrogen and temperature on the CO2 response of photosynthesis in the C3 dicot Chenopodium album L., Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 17, 135, 1990.
53. Hilbert, D. W., Larigauderie, A., and Reynolds, J. F., The influence of carbon dioxide and daily photon flux density on optimal leaf nitrogen concentration and root:shoot ratio, Ann. Bot., 68, 365, 1991.
54. Hunt, E. R. Jr., Weber, J. A., and Gates, D. M., Effects of nitrate application on Amaranthus poweliiWats.P I. changes in photosynthesis, growth rates, and leaf area, lant Physiol., 79, 609, 1985.
55. Marshall, B., and Vos, J., The relation between the nitrogen concentration and photosynthetic capacity of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) leaves, Ann. Bot., 68, 33, 1991.
56. Ampong-Nyarko, K., and De Datta, S. K., Effects of light and nitrogen and their interaction on the dynamics of rice-weed competition, Weed Res., 33, 1, 1993.
57. Lindquist, J. L., and Mortensen, D. A., Ecophysiological characteristics of four maize hybrids and Abutilon theophrasti, Weed Res., 39, 271, 1999.
58. ten Berge, H. F. M., Wopereis, M. C. S., Riethoven, J. J. M., and Drenth, H., Description of the ORYZA-0 modules (version 2.0), in ORYZA Simulation Modules for Potential and Nitrogen Limited Rice Production, Drenth, H., ten Berge, H. F. M., and Riethoven, J. J. M., Eds., Simulation and Systems Analysis for Rice Production (SARP) Research Proceedings, DLO-Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility, WAUDepartment of Theoretical Production Ecology, Wageningen, and International Rice Research Institute, 1994, 43.
59. Hasegawa, T., and Horie, T., Modelling the effect of nitrogen on rice growth and development, in Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development: Applications ofSystems Approaches at the Field Level, Kropff, M. J., Teng, P. S., Aggarwal, P. K., Bouma, J., Bouman, B. A. M., Jones, J. W., and van Laar, H. H., Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997, 243.
60. Kropff, M. J., Mechanisms of competition for nitrogen, in Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions, in Kropff, M. J., and van Laar, H. H., Eds., CAB International and the International Rice Research Institute, Wallingford, 1993, chap. 6.
61. Sinclair, T. R., and Muchow, R. C., Effect of nitrogen supply on maize yield: I. Modeling physiological responses, Agron. J., 87, 632, 1995.
62. Greenwood, D. J., Lemaire, G., Gosse, G., Cruz, P., Draycott, A., and Neeteson, J. J., Decline in percentage N of C3 and C4 crops with increasing plant mass, Ann. Bot., 66, 425, 1990.
63. Coleman, J. S., McConnaughay, K. D. M., and Bazzaz, F. A., Elevated CO2 and plant nitrogen-use: Is reduced tissue nitrogen concentration size-dependent?, Oecologia, 93, 195, 1993.
64. Honeycutt, C. W., Ziblinski, L. M., and Clapham W. M., Heat units for describing carbon mineralization and predicting net nitrogen mineralization, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 1346, 1988.
65. Honeycutt, C. W., and Potero, L. J., Field evaluation of heat units for predicting crop residue carbon and nitrogen mineralization, Plant and Soil, 125, 213, 1990.
66. Honeycutt, C. W., Potero, L. J., and Halteman, W. A., Predicting nitrate formation from soil, fertilizer, crop residue, and sludge with thermal units, J. Environ. Qual., 20, 850, 1991.
67. Cabrera, M. L., and Kissel, D. E., Evaluation of a method to predict nitrogen mineralized from soil organic matter under field conditions, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 1027, 1988.
68. Smethurst, P. J., and Comerford, N. B., Simulating nutrient uptake by single or competing and contrasting root systems, Soil Sci., 57,1361, 1993.
69. Nye, P. H., and Tinker, P. B., Solute Movement in the Soil-root System, University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1977.
70. Baldwin, J. P., Nye, P. H., and Tinker, P. B., Uptake of solutes by multiple root systems from soil, III, Plant and Soil, 38, 621, 1973.
71. Tardieu, F., Analysis of the spatial variability of maize root density. I. Effect of compactions on spatial arrangement of roots, Plant and Soil, 107, 259, 1988.
72. Jones, C. A., Bland, W. L., Ritchie, J. T., and Williams, J. R., Simulation of root growth, in Modeling Plant and Soil Systems, Agronomy Monograph No. 31, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 1991, chap. 6.
73. Hasegawa, T., and Horie, T., Leaf nitrogen, plant age and crop dry matter production in rice, Field Crops Res., 47, 107, 1996.
74. Lindquist, J. L., unpublished data, 1994.
75. Agren, G. I., and Ingestad, T., Root:shoot ratio as a balance between nitrogen productivity and photosynthesis, Plant, Cell & Environ., 10, 579, 1987.
76. Kastner-Maresch, A. E., and Mooney, H. A., Modelling optimal plant biomass partitioning, Ecol. Modelling, 75-76, 309, 1994.
77. Robinson, D., Compensatory changes in the partitioning of dry matter in relation to nitrogen uptake and optimal variations in growth, Ann. Bot., 58, 841, 1986.
78. Reynolds, J. F., and Chen, J., Modelling whole-plant allocation in relation to carbon and nitrogen supply: coordination versus optimization, Plant and Soil, 185, 65, 1996.
79. Hilbert, D. W., Optimization of plant root:shoot ratios and internal nitrogen concentration, Ann. Bot., 66, 91, 1990.
80. Hilbert, D. W., and Reynolds, J. F., A model allocating growth among leaf proteins, shoot structure, and root biomass to produce balanced activity, Ann. Bot., 68, 417, 1991.
81. Ingestad, I., and Agren, G. I., Theories and methods on plant nutrition and growth, Physiol. Plant., 84, 177, 1992.
82. Levin, S. A., Mooney, H. A., and Field, C., The dependence of plant root:shoot ratios on internal nitrogen concentration, Ann. Bot., 64, 71, 1989.
83. Thornley, J. H. M., A balanced quantitative model for root:shoot ratios in vegetative plants, Ann. Bot., 36, 431, 1972.
84. McConnaughay, K. D. M., and Coleman, J. S., Biomass allocation in plants: Ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients, Ecology, 80, 2581, 1999.
85. Girardin, P., Tollenaar, M., and Deltour, A., Effect of temporary N starvation in maize on leaf senescence, Can. J. Plant Sci., 65, 819, 1985.