Chemometric analysis of ligand receptor Complementarity: Identifying Complementary Ligands Based on Receptor Information (CoLiBRI)

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 844-851

  Oloff, Scott ^a,c   Zhang, Shuxing ^a   Sukumar, Nagamani ^b   Breneman, Curt ^a   Tropsha, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Research Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXATION; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; DATABASE SYSTEMS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; VECTORS; X RAY ANALYSIS;

CHEMOINFORMATICS; COMPLEMENTARY LIGANDS BASED ON RECEPTOR INFORMATION (COLIBRI); DELAUNAY TESSELLATION; RECEPTOR BINDING SITES;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

LIGAND;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING COMPETITION; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG SCREENING; FACTUAL DATABASE; METHODOLOGY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; LIGANDS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 33646251585     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci050065r     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Shoichet, B. K.; Kuntz, I. D. Matching Chemistry and Shape in Molecular Docking. Protein Eng. 1993, 6, 723-732.
2. Kuntz, I. D.; Meng, E. C.; Shoichet, B. K. Structure-Based Molecular Design. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 117-123.
3. Gschwend, D. A.; Good, A. C.; Kuntz, I. D. Molecular docking towards drug discovery. J. Mol. Recognit. 1996, 9, 175-186.
4. Oshiro, C. M.; Kuntz, I. D.; Dixon, J. S. Flexible Ligand Docking Using a Genetic Algorithm. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1995, 9, 113-130.
5. Goodsell, D. S.; Morris, G. M.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of AutoDock. J. Mol. Recognit. 1996, 9, 1-5.
6. Osterberg, F.; Morris, G. M.; Sanner, M. F.; Olson, A. J.; Goodsell, D. S. Automated docking to multiple target structures: incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock. Proteins 2002, 46, 34-40.
7. Muegge, I.; Rarey, M. Small Molecule Docking and Scoring. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry, 17th ed.; Lipkowitz, K. B., Boyd, D. B., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: 2001.
8. Kollman, P. Molecular-Dynamics and Free-Energy Perturbation Calculations - What Role Do They Play in Computer-Assisted Molecular Design. FASEB J. 1995, 9, A1253-A1253.
9. Kollman, P. Free-Energy Calculations - Applications to Chemical and Biochemical Phenomena. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2395-2417.
10. Aqvist, J.; Luzhkov, V. B.; Brandsdal, B. O. Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 358-365.
11. Aqvist, J.; Medina, C.; Samuelsson, J. E. New Method for Predicting Binding-Affinity in Computer-Aided Drug Design. Protein Eng. 1994, 7, 385-391.
12. Chen, X.; Tropsha, A. Calculation of the hydration free energies using an extended linear response method. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 749-759.
13. Zhou, R. H.; Friesner, R. A.; Ghosh, A.; Rizzo, R. C.; Jorgensen, W. L.; Levy, R. M. New linear interaction method for binding affinity calculations using a continuum solvent model. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 10388-10397.
14. Tropsha, A. Recent Trends in Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. In Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery, 6th ed.; Abraham, D., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2003; pp 49-77.
15. Livingstone, D. J. The characterization of chemical structures using molecular properties. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci 2000, 40, 195-209.
16. Willett, P. Chemoinformatics - similarity and diversity in chemical libraries. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 85-88.
17. Turner, D. B.; Willett, P. Evaluation of the EVA descriptor for QSAR studies: 3. The use of a genetic algorithm to search for models with enhanced predictive properties (EVA_GA). J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 1-21.
18. Breneman, C. M.; Thompson, T. R.; Rhem, M; Dung, M. Electron Density Modeling of Large Systems using the Transferable Atom Equivalent Method. Comput. Chem. 1995, 19, 161-169.
19. Mazza, C. B.; Sukumar, N.; Breneman, C. M.; Cramer, S. M. Prediction of protein retention in ion-exchange systems using molecular descriptors obtained from crystal structure. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 5457-5461.
20. Song, M.; Breneman, C. M.; Bi, J.; Sukumar, N.; Bennett. K. P.; Cramer, S.; Tugcu, N. Prediction of protein retention times in anion-exchange chromatography systems using support vector regression. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1347-1357.
21. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2977-2980.
22. Tripos Inc. Sybyl User's Manual Version 7.8; Tripos, Inc., St. Louis, MO, 2002.
23. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular connectivity VII: specific treatment of heteroatoms. J. Pharm. Sci. 1976, 65, 1806-1809.
24. Kier, L. B.; Murray, W. J.; Randic, M.: Hall, L. H. Molecular connectivity V: connectivity series concept applied to density. J. Pharm. Sci. 1976, 65, 1226-1230.
25. Kier, L. B.; Murray, W. J.; Hall, L. H. Molecular connectivity. 4. Relationships to biological activities. J. Med. Chem. 1975, 18, 1272-1274.
26. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H.; Murray, W. J.; Randic, M. Molecular connectivity. I: Relationship to nonspecific local anesthesia. J. Pharm. Sci. 1975, 64, 1971-1974.
27. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular Connectivity in Chemistry and Drug Research; Academic Press: New York, 1976.
28. Murray, W. J.; Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular connectivity. 6. Examination of the parabolic relationship between molecular connectivity and biological activity. J. Med. Chem. 1976, 19, 573-578.
29. Murray, W. J.; Hall, L. H.; Kier, L. B. Molecular connectivity. III: Relationship to partition coefficients. J. Pharm. Sci. 1975, 64, 1978-1981.
30. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. The Information Content of 2D and 3D Structural Descriptors Relevant to Ligand-Receptor Binding. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci 1997, 37, 1-9.
31. Shen, M.; Beguin, C.; Golbraikh, A.; Stables, J. P.; Kohn, H.; Tropsha, A. Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining: identification and experimental validation of novel anticonvulsant compounds. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2356-2364.
32. Mason, J. S.; Good, A. C.; Martin, E. J. 3-D pharmacophores in drug discovery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2001, 7, 567-597.
33. Metropolis, N.; Rosenbluth, A. W.; Rosenbluth, M. N.; Teller, A. H. Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 1087-1092.
34. Sun, L.; Xie, Y.; Song, X.; Wang, J.; Yu, R. Cluster Analysis By Simulated Annealing. Comput. Chem. 1994, 103-108.
35. Zheng, W.; Tropsha. A. Novel variable selection quantitative structure-property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 185-194.
36. Golbraikh, A.; Shen, M.; Xiao, Z.; Xiao, Y. D.; Lee, K. H.; Tropsha, A. Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 241-253.
37. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A. Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection. Mol. Divers. 2002, 5, 231-243.
38. Daylight, World Drug Index (WDI), 2004.
39. Tropsha, A.; Gramatica, P.; Gombar, V. K. The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models. Quant. Struct. Act. Relat. Comb. Sci. 2003, 22, 69-77.
40. Vapnik, V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag: 1995.