Cranial ontogeny of Papio baboons (Papio hamadryas)

American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 71-84

  Leigh, Steven R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Allometric scaling; Generalized Procrustes analysis; Heterochrony

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; ONTOGENY; PAPIO HAMADRYAS; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKULL; SUBSPECIES;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; CEPHALOMETRY; FEMALE; MALE; PAPIO HAMADRYAS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SKULL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33646236305     PISSN: 00029483     EISSN: 10968644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20319     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Ackermann RR, Rrovitz GE. 2002. Common patterns of facial ontogeny in the hominid lineage. Anat Rec 269:142-147.
2. Alba D. 2002. Shape and stage in heterochronic models. In: Minugh-Purvis N, McNamara KJ, editors. Human evolution through developmental change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. p 28-50.
3. Alberch P, Gould SJ, Oster GF, Wake DB. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phytogeny. Paleobiology 5:296-317.
4. Altmann SA. 1998. Foraging for survival: yearling baboons in Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Antón SC, Leigh SR. 2003. Growth and life history in Homo erectus. In: Thompson J, Krovitz GE, Nelson A, editors. Patterns of growth and development in the genus Homo. New York: Cambridge University Press. p 219-245.
6. Berge C, Penin X. 2004. Ontogcnctie allometry, heterochrony, and interspecific differences in the skull of Afriean apes, using tridimensional proerustes analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 124:124-138.
7. Brown P, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Jatmiko, Saptomo EW, Due RA. 2004. A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431:1055-1061.
8. Cabana T, Jolicouer P, Brown G. 1990. Brain and body growth allometry in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Growth Dev Aging 54:23-30.
9. Cabana T, Jolicouer P, Michaud J. 1993. Prenatal and postnatal growth and allometry of stature, head circumference, and brain weight in Québec children. Am J Hum Biol 5:93-99.
10. Cheverud JM. 1982. Relationships among ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometry. Am J Phys Anthropol 59:139-49.
11. Cobb SN, O'Higgins P. 2004. Hominins do not share a common postnatal facial ontogenetic shape trajectory. J Exp Zool [B] 302:302-321.
12. Cochard LR. 1985. Ontogenetic allometry of the skull and dentition of the rhesus monkey. In: Jungers WL, editor. Size and scaling in primate biology. New York: Plenum Press. p 231-255.
13. Cole TM. 1992. Postnatal heterochrony of the masticatory apparatus in Cebus paella and Cebus albifrons. J Hum Evol 23:253-282.
14. Collard M, O'Higgins P. 2001. Ontogeny and homoplasy in the papionin monkey face. Evol Dev 3:322-331
15. de Beer GA. 1958. Embryos and ancestors. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Disotell TR. 1994. Generic level relationships of the Papionini (Cercopithecoidea). Am J Phys Anthropol 94:47-57.
17. Dmoch R. 1976. Beiträge zum Formenwandel des Pramatencraniums mit Bemerkungen zu den sagittalen Knicksungsverhältnissen. V. Schussbetrachtung, Zusammenfasung, Literatur, und Tabellung. Gegenbaurs Morphol Jarhb 122:1-81.
18. Dryden IL, Mardia KV. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Freedman L. 1957. The fossil Cercopithecoidea of South Africa. Ann Transvaal Mus 23:122-262.
21. Freedman L. 1962. Growth of muzzle length relative to calvaria length in Papio. Growth 26:117-128.
22. Frost SR, Marcus LF, Bookstein FL, Reddy DP, Delson E. 2003. Cranial allometry, phylogeography, and systematics of large-bodied papionins (Primates: Cercopithecinae) inferred from geometric morphometric analysis of landmark data. Anat Rec 275:1048-1072.
23. Godfrey LR, Sutherland MR. 1996. Paradox of peramorphic paedomorphosis: heterochrony and human evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol 99:17-42.
24. Godfrey LR, King SJ, Sutherland MR. 1998. Heterochronic approaches to the study of locomotion. In: Strasser E, Fleagle JG, Rosenberger A, McHenry H, editors. Primate locomotion. New York: Plenum Press. p 277-307.
25. Godinot M. 2001. Enjeux des hétérochronies chez les primates. Primatologie 3:463-478.
26. Gould SJ. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogenesis and phylogeny. Q Rev Biol 41:587-640.
27. Gould SJ. 1971. Geometric similarity in allometric growth: a contribution to the problem of scaling in the evolution of size. Am Nat 105:113-136.
28. Gould SJ. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electronica 4:1-9. http://palaeo-eloctronica.org/2001_1/past/issuel_01.htm.
30. Haraway D. 1990. Primate visions. Now York: Routledge.
31. Harris EE. 2000. Molecular systematics of the Old World monkey tribe Papionini: analysis of the total available genetic sequences. J Hum Evol 38:235-256.
32. Huxley TH. 1932. Problems of relative growth. New York: Dial Press.
33. Hylander WL. 1984. Stress and strain in the mandibular symphysis of primates: a test of competing hypotheses. Am J Phys Anthropol 64:1-46.
34. Hylander WL, Johnson KR. 1994. Jaw muscle function and wishboning of the mandible during mastication in macaques and baboons. Am J Phys Anthropol 94:523-547.
35. Jolicoeur P. 1963. The degree of generality of robustness in Martes americana. Growth 27:1-27.
36. Jolly CJ. 1970. The large African monkeys as an adaptive array. In: Napier JR, Napier PH, editors. Old World monkeys-evolution, systematica, and behavior. New York: Academic Press. p 141-174.
37. Jolly CJ. 1993. Species, subspecies, and baboon systomatics. In: Kiinbel WH, Martin LB, editors. Species, species concepts, and primate evolution. New York: Plenum Press. p 67-108.
38. Jolly CJ. 2003. Commentary: cranial anatomy and baboon diversity. Anat Rec 275:1043-1047.
39. Lande R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3721-3725.
40. Lande R, Kirkpatrick M. 1988. Ecological speciation by sexual selection. J Theor Biol 133:85-98.
41. Leigh SR. 1992. Patterns of variation in tho ontogeny of primate body size dimorphism. J Hum Evol 23:27-50.
42. Leigh SR. 2002. Review of "Human evolution through developmental change." J Hum Evol 43:768-770.
43. Leigh SR. 2006. Growth and development. In: Vandeberg JL, Tardif SD, Williams-Blangcro S, editors. The baboon in biomedical research, volume 3. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press. In press.
44. Leigh SR, Bernstein RM. 2006. Ontogeny, life history, and maternal reproductive strategies in baboons. In: Swedell L, Leigh SR, editors. Life history, reproduction, and fitness in baboons. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press. In press.
45. Leigh SR, Cheverud JM. 1991. Sexual dimorphism in the baboon facial skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol 84:193-208.
46. Leigh SR, Shea BT. 1995. Ontogeny and the evolution of adult body size dimorphism in apes. Am J Primatol 36:37-60.
47. Leigh SR, Shah NF, Buchanan LB. 2003. Ontogeny and phylogeny in papionin primates. J Hum Evol 45:285-316.
48. Mira Imaging. 1994. Hyperspace modeler version 2.31, user's guide. San Jose, CA: Immersion Corp.
49. Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bernhard M, Schaefer K, Bookstein FL. 2004. Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. J Hum Evol 46:679-698.
50. Newman TK, Jolly CJ, Rogers J. 2004. Mitochondrial phylogeny and systematics of baboons (Papio). Am J Phys Anthropol 124:17-27.
51. O'Higgins P, Jones N. 1998. Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. J Anat 193:251-72.
52. Pilbeam DR, Gould SJ. 1972. Size and scaling in human evolution. Science 186:892-901.
53. Plavcan JM, van Schaik CP. 1992. Intrasexual competition and canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 87:461-477.
54. Raff RA. 1996. Tho shape of life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55. Ravosa MJ. 1992. Allometry and heterochrony in extant and extinct Malagasy primates. J Hum Evol 23:197-217.
56. Ravosa MJ. 1998. Cranial allometry and geographic variation in slow lorises (Nycticebus). Am J Primatol 45:225-243.
57. Ravosa MJ, Profant LP. 2000. Evolutionary morphology of the skull in Old World monkeys. In: Whitehead PF, Jolly CJ, editors. Old World monkeys. New York: Cambridge University Press. p 237-268.
58. Rice SH. 2002. The role of heterochrony in primate brain evolution. In: Minugh-Purvis N, McNamara KJ, editors. Human evolution through developmental change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. p 154-172.
59. Richtsmeier J, DeLeon VB, Lele SR. 2002. The promise of geometric morphometrics. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 35:63-91.
60. Rohlf FJ. 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimposition and tangent spaces. J Class 16:197-223.
61. Schultz AH. 1929. The technique of measuring the outer body of human fetuses and of primates in general. Carnegie Mus Contrib Embryol 117:213-257.
62. Shea BT. 1983a. Paedomorphosis and neoteny in the pygmy chimpanzee. Science 222:521-522.
63. Shea BT. 1983b. Allometry and heterochrony in the African apes. Am J Phys Anthropol 62:275-289.
64. Shea BT. 1985. The ontogeny of sexual dimorphism in African apes. Am J Phys Anthropol 8:183-188.
65. Shea BT. 1989. Heterochrony in human evolution: the case for neoteny reconsidered. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 32:69-101.
66. Shea BT. 1992. Developmental perspectives on size change and allometry in evolution. Evol Anthropol 1:125-134.
67. Shea BT. 2000. Current issues in the investigation of evolution by heterochrony, with emphasis on the debate over human neoteny. In: Parker Taylor S, Langer J, McKinney ML, editors. Biology, brains and behavior. Santa Fe, NM: School for American Research. p 181-214.
68. Shea BT. 2002. Are some heterochronic transformations likelier than others? In: Minugh-Purvis N, McNamara KJ, editors. Human evolution through developmental change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. p 79-101.
69. Singleton AM. 2002. Patterns of cranial shape variation in the-Papionini (Primates: Cercopithecinae). J Hum Evol 42:547-578.
70. Sithaldeen R, Babb PL, Ackermann RR, Newman TK. 2005. Assessing gene flow and population subdivision in chacma baboons (Papio hamadryas ursinus) using mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers. Am J Phys Anthropol [Suppl] 40:191 [abstract].
71. Slice DE. 2001. Landmark coordinates aligned by Procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space. Syst Biol 50:141-149.
72. Strasser E, Delson E. 1987. Cladistic analysis of cercopithecid relationships. J Hum Evol 16:81-100.
73. Wilkinson L. 2004. Systat 11: statistics. Richmond, CA: Systat, Inc.
74. Williams-Blangero S, Vandeberg JL, Blangero J, Konigsberg L, Dyke B. 1990. Genetic differentiation between baboon subspecies: Relevance for biomedical research. Am J Primatol 20:67-81.
75. Wright S. 1932. General, group, and specific factors. Genetics 17:603-619.
76. Zuckerman S. 1926. Growth-changes in the skull of the baboon, Papio porcarius. Proc Zool Soc Lond 55:843-873.
77. Zuckerman S. 1955. Age changes in the basicranial axis of the human skull. Am J Phys Anthropol 13:521-540.