Increasing diversity in In-silico screening with target flexibility

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3695 LNBI, Issue , 2005, Pages 186-197

  Fischer, B ^a   Merlitz, H ^a   Wenzel, W ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); SUBSTRATES;

IN-SILICO SCREENING; LIGANDS; RECEPTOR; TARGET FLEXIBILITY; THYMIDINE KINASE;

SCREENING;

EID: 33646190922     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11560500_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. William L. Jorgensen. The many roles of computation in drug discovery. Science, 303:1813-1818, 2004.
2. W.P. Walters, M.T. Stahl, and M.A. Murcko. Virtual screening - an overview. Drug Discovery Today, 3:160, 1998.
3. J. Drews. Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science, 287:1960, 2000.
4. G. Klebe and H. Gohlke. Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors. Angew. Chemie (Intl. Ed.), 41:2644, 2002.
5. G. Schneider and H.J. Boehm. Virtual screening and fast automated docking methods. Drug Discovery Today, 7:64, 2003.
6. Paul D. Lyne. Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. Drug Discovery Today, 7:1047, 2002.
7. C. Bissantz, G. Folkerts, and D. Rognan. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J. Med. Chem., 43:4759, 2000.
8. Maxim Totrov and Ruben Abagyan. Flexible protein-ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates. Proteins, 29:215-220, 1998.
9. C. W. Murray, C. A. Baxter, and A. D. Frenkel. The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: Application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 13:547-562, 1999.
10. V. Schnecke and L.A. Kuhn. Virtual screening with solvation and ligand-induced complementarity. Persp. Drug. Des. Discovery, 20:171, 2000.
11. F. Osterberg. Automated docking to multiple target structures: incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in autodock. Proteins, 46:34, 2002.
12. H. Claußen, C. Buning, M. Rarey, and T. Lengbauer. Flexe: Efficient molecular docking consiudering protein structure variations. J. Mol. Biol., 308:377-395, 2001.
13. Claudio N. Cavasotto and Ruben A. Abagyan. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. J. Mol. Biol., 337:1161, 2004.
14. Binqung Q. Wei, Larry H. Weaver, Anna M. Ferrari, Brian W. Matthews, and Brian K. Shoichet. Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. J. Mol. Biol, 337:1161, 2004.
15. H. Merlitz and W. Wenzel. Comparison of stochastic optimization methods for receptor-ligand docking. Chem. Phys. Lett, 362:271-277, 2002.
16. H. Merlitz, B. Burghardt, and W. Wenzel. Application of the stochastic tunneling method to high throughput database screening. Chem, Phys. Lett., 370:68, 2003.
17. W. Wenzel H. Merlitz, T. Herges. Fluctuation analysis and accuracy of a large-scale in silico screen. J. Comp. Chem., 25:1568-1575, 2004.
18. W. Wenzel and K. Harnacher. Stochastic tunneling approach for global optimization of complex potential energy landscapes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82:3003-3007, 1999.
19. H. Merlitz and W. Wenzel. Impact of receptor flexibility on in-silico screening performance. Chem. Phys. Lett, 390:500, 2004.
20. W.L. Jorgensen and N.A. McDonald. Development of an all-atom force field for heterocycles.properties of liquid pyridine and diazenes. J. Mol. Struct., 424:145, 1997.
21. G.M. Morris, D.S. Goodsell, R. Halliday andR. Huey, W.E. Hart, R.K. Belew, and A.J. Olson. Automated docking using a lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem., 19:1639, 1998.
22. J.N. Champness, M.S. Bennett, F. Wien, R. Visse, W.C. Summers, P. Herdewijn, E. de Clerq, T. Ostrowski, and R.L. Jarvestand M.R. Sanderson. Exploring the active site of herpes simplex virus type-1 thymidine kinase by x-ray crystallographyof complexes aciclovir and other ligands. Proteins, 32:350, 1998.
23. P. Pospisil, T. Kuoni, L. Scapozza, and G. Folkers. Methodology and open problems of molecular docking: Cases of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, thymidine kinase and phosphodiesterase 4. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res., 22:141, 2002.
24. Louise Birch, Christopher W. Murray, Michael J. Hartshorn, Ian J. Tickle, and Marcel L. Verdonk. Sensitivity of molecular docking to induced fit effects in influenza virus neuraminidase. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Design, 16:855, 2002.
25. G.W.A. Milne, M.C. Nicklaus, J.S. Driscoll, and and D. Zaharevitz S. Wang. National cancer institute drug information system 3d database. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34:1219, 1994.