Pattern-based analysis of the control-flow perspective of UML activity diagrams

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3716 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 63-78

  Wohed, Petia ^a   Van Der Aalst, Wil M P ^b,c   Dumas, Marion ^c   Ter Hofstede, Arthur H M ^c   Russell, Nick ^c  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN AUTOMATIQUE DE NANCY   (France)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Activity Diagrams; UML; Workflow Patterns; YAWL

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS CONTROL;

ACTIVITY DIAGRAMS; UML; WORKFLOW PATTERNS; YAWL;

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

EID: 33646168047     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11568322_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. W.M.P. van der Aalst, L. Aldred, M. Dumas, and A.H.M. ter Hofstede. Design and Implementation of the YAWL System. In A. Persson and J. Stirna, editors, Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE'04), volume 3084 of LNCS, pages 142-159. Springer, 2004.
2. W.M.P. van der Aalst and A.H.M. ter Hofstede. YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language. Information Systems, 30(4):245-275, 2005.
3. W.M.P. van der Aalst, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and A.P. Barros. Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1):5-51, 2003.
4. F. Casati, S. Ceri, B. Pernici, and G. Pozzi. Conceptual Modelling of Workflows. In M.P. Papazoglou, editor, Proc. of the 14th Int. Object-Oriented and Entity-Relationship Modelling Conf. (OOER), volume 1021 of LNCS, pages 341-354. Springer, 1998.
5. M. Dumas and A. ter Hofstede. UML Activity Diagrams as a Workflow Specification Language. In M. Gogolla and C. Kobryn, editors, Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on the Unified Modeling Language (UML01), volume 2185 of LNCS, pages 76-90. Springer Verlag, 2001.
6. P. Green and M. Rosemann. Applying Ontologies to Business and Systems Modeling Techniques and Perspectives: Lessons Learned. Journal of Database Management, 15(2):105-117, 2004.
7. S. Jablonski and C. Bussler. Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture, and Implementation. International Thomson Computer Press, London, UK, 1996.
8. J-H. Kim and C. Huemer. Analysis, Transformation, and Improvements of ebXML Choreographies Based on Workflow Patterns. In R. Meersman and Z. Tari, editors, Proc. of the OTM Confederated Int. Conf. (CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE), Part I, volume 3290 of LNCS, pages 66-84. Springer, 2004.
9. OMG. UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification. UML 2.0 Superstructure FTF convenience document ptc/04-10-02, 2004. www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2004-10-02.
10. A.L. Opdahl and B. Henderson-Sellers. Ontological Evaluation of the UML Using the Bunge-Wand-Weber Model. Software and System Modeling, 1(1):43-67, 2002.
11. N. Russell, W.M.P. van der Aalst, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and D. Edmond. Workflow Resouce Patterns: Identification, Representation and Tool Suppport. In O. Pastor and J. Falcão e Cunha, editors, Proc. of 17th Int. Conf. on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE05), volume 3520 of LNCS, pages 216-232. Springer, 2005.
12. N. Russell, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, D. Edmond, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. Workflow Data Patterns. In L. Delcambre, H.C. Mayr, J. Mylopoulos, and O. Pastor, editors, to appear in Proc. of 24th Int. Conf. on Conceptual Modeling (ER05), LNCS. Springer Verlag, Oct 2005.
13. H. Störrle. Semantics of Control-Flow in UML 2.0 Activities. In P. Bottoni, C. Hundhausen, S. Levialdi, and G. Tortora, editors, Proc. of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC'04), pages 235-242. Springer Verlag, 2004.
14. WfMC. Workflow Management Coalition Terminology & Glossary, Document Number WFMC-TC-1011, Document Status - Issue 3.0. Technical report, Workflow Management Coalition, Brussels, Belgium, 1999.
15. S. White. Process Modeling Notations and Workflow Patterns. In L. Fischer, editor, Workflow Handbook 2004, pages 265-294. Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point, FL, USA, 2004.
16. P. Wohed, W.M.P. van der Aalst, M. Dumas, and A.H.M. ter Hofstede. Analysis of Web Services Composition Languages: The Case of BPEL4WS. In Il-Y. Song, S. W. Liddle, T. W. Ling, and P. Scheuermann, editors, Proc. of 22nd Int. Conf. on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2003), volume 2813 of LNCS, pages 200-215. Springer, 2003.
17. P. Wohed, W.M.P. van der Aalst, M. Dumas, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and N. Russell. Pattern-based Analysis of UML Activity Diagrams. BETA Working Paper Series, WP 129, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2004. http://www.bpm.fit.gut.edu.au/projects/babel/docs/p242.pdf.
18. P. Wohed, E. Perjons, M. Dumas, and A.H.M. ter Hofstede. Pattern Based Analysis of EAI Languages - The Case of the Business Modeling Language. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2003), volume 3, pages 174-184, 2003.
19. M.T. Wynn, D. Edmond, W.M.P. van der Aalst, and A.H.M. ter Hofstede. Achieving a General, Formal and Decidable Approach to the OR-Join in Workflow Using Reset Nets. In G. Ciardo and P. Darondeau, editors, Proc. of 26th Int. Conf. on Applications and Theory of Petri Nets 2005, volume 3536 of LNCS, pages 423-443. Springer, 2005.