Group differences in intelligence and related measures

Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 223-240

  Wittmann, Werner W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646112329     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452233529.n13     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22(2), 227-257.doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(96)90016-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896%2896%2990016-1
2. Ackerman, P. L. (2002). Gender differences in intelligence and knowledge: How should we look at achievement score differences? Issues in Education, 8(1), 21-31.
3. Ackerman, P. L., & Cianciolo, A. T. (2002). Ability and task constraint determinants of complex task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(3), 194-208.doi:10.1037/1076-898X.8.3.194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.3.194
4. Ackerman, P. L., & Kanfer, R. (1993). Integrating laboratory and field study for improving selection: Development of a battery for predicting air traffic controller success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 413-432.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.413
5. Ackerman, P. L., Kanfer, R., & Goff, M. (1995). Cognitive and non-cognitive determinants and consequences of complex skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 270-304.doi:10.1037/1076-898X.1.4.270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.1.4.270
6. Baumert, J., Klieme, E., Neubrand, M., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., Schneider, W., et al. (2001). PISA 2000. Basiskompetenz von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich [PISA 2000: Basic competencies of female and male students in international comparisons]. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
7. Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Brehmer, B. (1995). Feedback delays in complex dynamic decision tasks. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 103-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Chubb, J. E., & Loveless, T.(Eds.). (2002). Bridging the achievement gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11. Cook, T. D., Habib, F., Phillips, M. A., Settersten, R. A., Shagle, S. C., & Degirmencioglu, S. M. (1999). Comer’s school development program in Prince George’s country: A theory-based evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 543-597.
12. Cook, T. D., Hunt, H. D., & Murphy, R. F. (2000). Comer’s school development program in Chicago: A theory-based evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 535-597.
13. Corno, L., Cronbach, L. J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D. F., Mandinach, E. B., Porteus, A. W., et al. (2001). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
15. Crouch, C., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970-977.doi:10.1119/1.1374249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
16. Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H. W., Reither, F., & Stäudel, T. (1983). Lohhausen. Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität [Lohhausen: About dealing with indeterminacy and complexity]. Bern: Huber.
17. Fremer, J., Lohman, D. F., & Wittmann, W. W. (2002). The Swedish national aptitude test: A 25 year testing program: Current status and future development (Vol. 22R). Stockholm: National Agency for Higher Education.
18. Frensch, P., & Funke, J. (1995). Complex problem solving: The European perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Gustafsson, J.-E., Wedman, I., & Westerlund, A. (1992). The dimensionality of the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude test. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 36, 21-39.doi:10.1080/0031383920360102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0031383920360102
20. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.doi:10.1119/1.18809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
21. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Halpern, D. F. (2002). Sex differences in achievement scores: Can we design assessments that are fair, meaningful, and valid for girls and boys? Issues in Education, 8(1), 1-12.
23. Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Hauser, R. M. (1998). Trends in Black-White test-score differentials: I. Uses and misuses of NAEP/SAT data. In U. Neisser(Ed.), The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures (pp. 219-249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
26. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-158.doi:10.1119/1.2343497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497
27. Hunt, E. (1995). Will we be smart enough? A cognitive analysis of the coming workforce. New York: Russell Sage.
28. Jäger, A. O., Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test [Berlin Intelligence Structure test] (BIS Test, Form 4). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
29. Jencks, C., & Phillips, D. (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30. Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.
31. Kersting, K. (2003). Cognitive sex differences: A "political minefield." APA Monitor, 34(5), 54.
32. Lemann, N. (1999). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.
33. Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 718-729.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.718
34. Mayer, S. E., & Peterson, P. E.(Eds.). (1999). Earning & learning: How schools matter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
35. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: Getting students to think in class. In E. Edward, F. Redish, & J. S. Rigden (Eds.), The changing role of physics departments in modern universities: Part 2. Sample classes, AIP conference proceedings (pp. 981-988). Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
36. Omodei, M. M., & Wearing, A. J. (1993). The fire space chief: User manual. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.
37. Pawlik, K. (1976). Model und Praxisdimensionen psychologischer Diagnostik [Model and practice dimensions of psychological assessment]. In K. Pawlik(Ed.), Diagnose der Diagnostik (pp. 13-43). Stuttgart: Klett.
38. Stanat, P., & Kunter, M. (2001). Geschlechtsunterschiede in Basiskompetenzen [Gender differences in key competencies]. In J. Baumert, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider, et alz. (Eds.), PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 251-269). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.doi:10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6
39. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629.doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613
40. Süß, H. M. (1996). Intelligenz, Wissen und Problemlösen, Kognitive Voraussetzungen für erfolgreiches Handeln bei computersimulierten Problemen [Intelligence, knowledge and problem solving: Cognitive prerequisites for successful performance in computer-simulated problems]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
41. Wittmann, W. W., & Klumb, P. L. (in press). How to fool yourself with experiments in testing psychological theories. In R. R. Bootzin & P. McKnight (Eds.), Measurement, methodology, and evaluation: Festschrift in honor of Lee Sechrest. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Wittmann, W. W., & Süß, H.-M. (1999). Investigating the paths between working memory, intelligence, knowledge, and complex problem-solving performances via Brunswik-symmetry. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 77-108). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.