Optimizing Techniques for Musculoskeletal Imaging of the Postoperative Patient

Radiologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 323-329

  Sofka, Carolyn M ^a,b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRACER;

ALGORITHM; ARTHROCENTESIS; ARTHROPLASTY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MUSCLE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SCINTIGRAPHY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TENDON; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND;

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;

EID: 33646086955     PISSN: 00338389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2006.01.008     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Duus B.R., Boeckstyns M., Kjaer L., et al. Radionuclide scanning after total knee replacement: correlation with pain and radiolucent lines, a prospective study. Invest Radiol 22 (1987) 891-894
2. Kantor S.G., Schneider R., Insall J.N., et al. Radionuclide imaging of asymptomatic versus symptomatic total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260 (1990) 118-123
3. Schneider R., and Soudry M. Radiographic and scintigraphic evaluation of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 205 (1986) 108-120
4. Van Holsbeeck M.T., Eyler W.R., Sherman L.S., et al. Detection of infection in loosened hip prostheses: efficacy of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163 (1994) 381-384
5. Sofka C.M., and Adler R.S. Sonographic evaluation of shoulder arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 (2003) 1117-1120
6. Cuomo F., and Checroun A. Avoiding pitfalls and complications in total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 29 (1998) 507-518
7. Sofka C.M., Adler R.S., and Laskin R. Sonography of polyethylene liners used in total knee arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 (2003) 1437-1441
8. Jacobson J.A., and Lax M.J. Musculoskeletal sonography of the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskel Radiol 6 (2002) 67-77
9. Wank R., Miller T.T., and Shapiro J.F. Sonographically guided injection of anesthetic for iliopsoas tendinopathy after total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Ultrasound 32 (2004) 354-357
10. Ebraheim N.A., Coombs R., Rusin J.J., et al. Reduction of post-operative CT artifacts of pelvic fractures by use of titanium implants. Orthopaedics 13 (1990) 1357-1358
11. Haramati N., Staron R.B., Mazel-Sperling K., et al. CT scans through metal: scanning technique versus hardware composition. Comput Med Imag Graph 18 (1994) 429-434
12. White L.M., and Buckwalter K.A. Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskel Radiol 6 (2002) 5-17
13. Robertson D.D., Weiss P.J., Fishman E.K., et al. Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. J Comput Assist Tomog 12 (1988) 236-241
14. Claus A.M., Totterman S.M., Synchterz C.J., et al. Computed tomography to assess pelvis lysis after total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 422 (2004) 167-174
15. White L.M., Kim J.K., Mehta M., et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 215 (2000) 254-262
16. Eustace S., Goldberg R., Williamson D., et al. MR imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopaedic hardware: techniques to minimize susceptibility artifact. Clin Radiol 52 (1997) 589-594
17. Tartaglino L.M., Flanders A.E., Vinitski S., et al. Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 190 (1994) 565-569
18. Sofka C.M., Potter H.G., Figgie M., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406 (2003) 129-135
19. Sofka C.M., and Potter H.G. MR imaging of joint arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskel Radiol 6 (2002) 79-85
20. Potter H.G., Nestor B.J., Sofka C.M., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A (2004) 947-954
21. van Trommel M.F., Potter H.G., Ernberg L.A., et al. The use of noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating meniscal repair: comparison with conventional arthrography. Arthroscopy 14 (1998) 2-8
22. Potter H.G., Rodeo S.A., Wickiewicz T.L., et al. MR imaging of meniscal allografts: correlation with clinical and arthroscopic outcomes. Radiology 198 (1996) 509-514
23. Olscamp A.J., Tao S.S., Savolaine E.R., et al. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of Pipkin fractures fixated with titanium implants: a report of two cases. Am J Orthoped 26 (1997) 294-297
24. Henk C.B., Brodner W., Grampp S., et al. The postoperative spine. Top Magn Reson Imaging 10 (1999) 247-264
25. Mueller P.R., Stark D.D., Simeone J.F., et al. MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 161 (1986) 605-609
26. Frazzini V.I., Kagetsu N.J., Johnson C.E., et al. Internally stabilized spine: optimal choice of frequency-encoding gradient direction during MR imaging minimizes susceptibility artifact from titanium vertebral body screws. Radiology 204 (1997) 268-272
27. Hilfiker P., Zanetti M., Debatin J.F., et al. Fast spin-echo inversion-recovery imaging versus fast T2-weighted spin-echo imaging in bone marrow abnormalities. Invest Radiol 30 (1995) 110-114
28. Kornaat P.R., Reeder S.B., Koo S., et al. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13 (2005) 338-344
29. Yoshioka H., Stevens K., Hargreaves B.A., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. J Magn Reson Imag 20 (2004) 857-864
30. Yoshioka H., Alley M., Steines D., et al. Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imag 18 (2003) 66-71
31. Cicuttini F., Forbes A., Asbeutah A., et al. Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume. J Orthop Res 18 (2000) 580-584
32. Hendrick R.E. Basic physics of MR imaging: an introduction. Radiographics 17 (1994) 829-846
33. Taber K.H., Herrick R.C., Weathers S.W., et al. Pitfalls and artifacts encountered in clinical MR imaging of the spine. Radiographics 18 (1998) 1499-1521
34. Sperling J.W., Potter H.G., Craig E.V., et al. MRI of the painful shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 (2002) 315-321
35. Schatz J.A., Potter H.G., Rodeo S.A., et al. MR imaging of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 (1997) 223-228