TASSER-based refinement of NMR structures

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 451-456

  Lee, Seung Yup ^a   Zhang, Yang ^b   Skolnick, Jeffrey ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

NMR structure refinement; Protein structure prediction; TASSER; X ray structure

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; TASSER ALGORITHM; X RAY ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; FORECASTING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR;

EID: 33646041930     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20902     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
2. Branden C, Tooze J. Introduction to protein structure. New York: Garland Science; 1999.
3. Fersht AR. Structure and mechanism in protein science: a guide to enzyme catalysis and protein folding. New York: Freeman; 1999.
4. Guntert P. Structure calculation of biological macromolecules from NMR data. Q Rev Biophys 1998;31:145-237.
5. Doreleijers JF, Rullmann JA, Kaptein R. Quality assessment of NMR structures: a statistical survey. J Mol Biol 1998;281:149-164.
6. Doreleijers JF, Raves ML, Rullmann T, Kaptein R. Completeness of NOEs in protein structure: a statistical analysis of NMR. J Biomol NMR 1999;14:123-132.
7. Drennth J. Principles of protein X-ray crystallography. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1999.
8. Doreleijers JF, Vriend G, Raves ML, Kaptein R. Validation of nuclear magnetic resonance structures of proteins and nucleic acids: hydrogen geometry and nomenclature. Proteins 1999;37:404-416.
9. Bastolla U, Farwer J, Knapp EW, Vendruscolo M. How to guarantee optimal stability for most representative structures in the protein data bank. Proteins 2001;44:79-96.
10. Spronk CA, Linge JP, Hilbers CW, Vuister GW. Improving the quality of protein structures derived by NMR spectroscopy. J Biomol NMR 2002;22:281-289.
11. Spronk CA, Nabuurs SB, Bonvin AM, Krieger E, Vuister GW, Vriend G. The precision of NMR structure ensembles revisited. J Biomol NMR 2003;25:225-234.
12. Linge JP, Nilges M. Influence of non-bonded parameters on the quality of NMR structures: a new force field for NMR structure calculation. J Biomol NMR 1999;13:51-59.
13. Kuszewski J, Clore GM. Sources of and solutions to problems in the refinement of protein NMR structures against torsion angle potentials of mean force. J Magn Reson 2000;146:249-254.
14. Nabuurs SB, Nederveen AJ, Vranken W, Doreleijers JF, Bonvin AM, Vuister GW, Vriend G, Spronk CA. DRESS: a database of refined solution NMR structures. Proteins 2004;55:483-486.
15. Fan H, Mark AE. Relative stability of protein structures determined by X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy : a molecular dynamics simulation study. Proteins 2003;53:111-120.
16. Garbuzynskiy SO, Melnik BS, Lobanov MY, Finkelstein AV, Galzitskaya OV. Comparison of X-ray and NMR structures: is there a systematic difference in residue contacts between X-ray and NMR-resolved protein structures? Proteins 2005;60:139-147.
17. Li W, Zhang Y, Kihara D, Huang YJ, Zheng D, Montelione GT, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. TOUCHSTONEX: protein structure prediction with sparse NMR data. Proteins 2003;53:290-306.
18. Li W, Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Application of sparse NMR restraints to large-scale protein structure prediction. Biophy J 2004;87:1241-1248.
19. Kordel J, Pearlman DA, Chazin WJ. Protein solution structure calculation in solution: solvated molecular dynamics refinement of calbindin D9k. J Biomol NMR 1997;10:231-243.
20. Kuszewski J, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. Improvements and extensions n the conformational database potential for the refinement of NMR and X-ray structures of proteins and nucleic acids. J Magn Reson 1997;125:171-177.
21. Nederveen AJ, Doreleijers JF, Vranken W, Miller Z, Spronk CA, Nabuurs SB, Guntert P, Livny M, Markley JL, Nilges M, Ulrich EL, Kaptein R, Bonvin AM. RECOORD: a recalculated coordinate database of 500+ proteins from the PDB using restraints from the BioMagResBank. Proteins 2005;59:662-672.
22. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:7594-7599.
23. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Tertiary structure prediction on a comprehensive benchmark on medium to large size proteins. Biophy J 2004;87:2647-2655.
24. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;102:1029-1034.
25. Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, Skolnick J. TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6. Proteins 2005;61:91-98.
26. Skolnick J, Kihara D, Zhang Y. Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR_3 threading algorithm. Proteins 2004;56:502-518.
27. Zhang Y, Kihara D, Skolnick J. Local energy landscape flattening: parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding. Proteins 2002;48:192-201.
28. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds. J Comput Chem 2004;25:865-871.
29. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
30. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-410.
31. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702-710.