Ontology mappings to improve learning resource search

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 375-389

  GaSevio, Dragan ^a   Hatala, Marek ^a,b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b School of Interactive Arts and Technology   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; ONTOLOGY MAPPINGS; SEMANTIC WEB INITIATIVE; SIMPLE KNOWLEDGE ORGANISATION SYSTEM;

ALGORITHMS; EDUCATION COMPUTING; SEMANTICS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS;

CURRICULA;

EID: 33645964023     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00611.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ACM DL (2005). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library. Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://www.acm.org/dl
2. Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J. Horrocks, J. McGuinness, D. L., Patel-Schneider, P. F. et al (2004). OWL web ontology language reference, W3C recommendation. Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://www.w3.org/TR/owl- ref/
3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American. 284, 5, 34-43.
4. Brase, J. & Nejdl, W. (2004). Ontologies and metadata for elearning. In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds), Handbook on ontologies, (pp. 555-574). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
5. Brin, S. & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. 30, 1-7, 107-117.
6. Crubézy, M. & Musen, M. A. (2003). Ontologies in support of problem solving. In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds), Handbook on ontologies in information systems, (pp. 321-341). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
7. Duval, E. (Ed.) (2002). 1484.12.1 IEEE standard for learning object metadata. Retrieved October 6, 2005, from, http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/ LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf
8. Friedman-Hill, F. (2003). Jess in action. Greenwich, USA: Manning Publications.
9. Greenberg, J. & Robertson, W. D. (2002). Semantic Web construction: an inquiry of authors' views on collaborative metadata generation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata for e-Communities, Florence, Italy, (pp. 45-52).
10. Hatala, M., Wakkary, R. & Kalantari, L. (2005). Ontologies and rules in support of real-time ubiquitous application [Special issue on Rules and Ontologies for Semantic Web]. Journal of Web Semantics, 3, 1, 5-22.
11. Hendler, J. (2001). Agents and the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16, 2, 30-37.
12. Hädrich, T. & Priebe, T. (2005). A context-based approach for supporting knowledge work with semantic portals. International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems, 1, 3, 63-88.
13. IM (2001). ACM/IEEE computer society computing curricula. Information Management course curriculum recommendation. Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/final/im.htm
14. Kalfoglou, Y. & Schorlemmer, M. (2003). Ontology mapping: the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18, 1, 1-31.
15. Kaykova, O., Khriyenko, O., Kovtun, D., Naumenko, A., Terziyan, V. & Zharko, A. (2005). General adaption framework: enabling interoperability for industrial web resources. International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems, 1, 3, 30-62.
16. Kopena, J. & Regli, W. C. (2003). DAMLJessKB: a tool for reasoning with the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18, 3, 74-77.
17. Lytras, M., Tsilira, A. & Themistocleous, M. (2003). Towards the semantic e-learning: an onto-logical orientated discussion of the new research agenda in e-learning. In Proceedings of the 9th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, FL, USA, (pp. 2985-2997).
18. Miles, A. & Brickley, D. (2004). SKOS mapping vocabulary specification. W3C document. Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mapping/spec/
19. Miles, A. & Brickley, D. (2005). SKOS core vocabulary specification. W3C working draft, Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp- skos-core-guide/
20. Nejdl, W., Wolf, B., Qu, C., Decker, S., Sintek, M., Naeve, A. etal (2002). EDUTELLA: A P2P networking infrastructure based on RDF. In Proceedings of the 11th International World Wide Web Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, (pp. 604-615).
21. Nilsson, M., Palmer, M. & Brase, J. (2003). The LOM RDF binding-principles and implementation. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ARIADNE Conference, Leuven, Belgium.
22. NKOS (2000). Taxonomy of knowledge organization sources/systems. Networked Knowledge Organization Systems/Services (NKOS). Retrieved October 6, 2005, from http://nkos.slis.kent.edu/ KOS_taxonomy.htm
23. Noy, N. F. (2004). Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches. SIGMOD Record, 33, 4, 65-70.
24. Noy, N. F. & Hafner, C. (1997). The state of the art in ontology design: a survey and comparative review. AI Magazine, 18, 3, 53-74.
25. Rasseneur, D., Jacoboni, P. & Tchounikine, P. (2003). Enhancing a web-based distance-learning curriculum with dedicated tools. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence, Halifax, Canada, (pp.285-291).
26. Sampson, D. G., Lytras, M. D., Wagner, G. & Diaz, P. (2004). Guest editorial: ontologies and the Semantic Web for e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 7, 4, 26-28.
27. Stojanović, L., Staab, S. & Studer, R. (2001). eLearning based on the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the World Conference on the WWW and the Internet (WebNet 2001), Orlando, FL, USA.
28. Swartout, W. & Tate, A. (1999). Guest editors' introduction: ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14, 1, 18-19.
29. Wille, C., Dumke, R. R, Abran, A. & Desharnais, J. M. (2004). e-Learning infrastructure for software engineering education: steps in ontology modeling for SWEBOK. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering, Innsbruck, Austria, (pp. 520-525).