A context-based approach for supporting knowledge work with semantic portals

International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 64-88

  Hädrich, Thomas ^a   Priebe, Torsten ^b  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Context; Knowledge stance; Knowledge work; Portals

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT; ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION SOURCES; INTEGRATED SUPPORTS; KNOWLEDGE STANCE; KNOWLEDGE WORK; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY; SUPPORTING KNOWLEDGE;

COMPUTER NETWORKS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PORTALS;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33645985435     PISSN: 15526283     EISSN: 15526291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jswis.2005070103     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abecker, A., Bernardi, A., Maus, H., Sintek, M., & Wenzel, C. (2000). Information supply for business processes: Coupling workflow with document analysis and information retrieval. Knowledge Based Systems, 13(5), 271-284.
2. Abecker, A. et al. (2001). The DECOR toolbox for workflow-embedded organizational memory access. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2001), Setubal, Portugal.
3. Allweyer, T. (1998). Modellbasiertes Wissensmanagement. Information Management, 13(1), 37-45.
4. Bach, V. & Österle, H. (Eds.). (2000). Customer relationship management in der praxis. Erfolgreiche wege zu kundenzentrierten lösungen. Berlin: Springer.
5. Baeza-Yates, R., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (Eds.). (1999). Modern information retrieval. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
6. Barry, C.L. & Schamber, L. (1998). Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison. Information Processing & Management, 34(2-3), 219-236.
7. Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021-1046.
8. Böhm, K. & Härtwig, J. (2005). Prozessorientiertes Wissensmanagement Durch Kontextualisierte Informations-Versorgung aus Geschäftsprozessen. Paper presented at the Sixth Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2005), Bamberg, Germany.
9. Broekstra, J., Kampman, A., & van Harmelen, F. (2002). Sesame: A generic architecture for storing and querying RDF and RDF schema. Paper presented at the First International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2002), Sardinia, Italy.
10. Chaudhuri, S., & Dayal, U. (1997). An overview of data warehousing and OLAP technology. ACM SIGMOD Record, 26 (1).
11. Clases, C. & Wehner, T. (2002). Steps across the border: Cooperation, knowledge production and systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(1), 39-54.
12. Corcho, Ó., Gómez-Pérez, A., López-Cima, A., López-García, V., & Suárez-Figueroa, M.D. (2003). ODESeW: Automatic generation of knowledge portals for intranets and extranets. Paper presented at the Second International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2003), Sanibel Island, Florida.
13. Dey, A.K. & Abowd, G.D. (1999). Towards a better understanding of context and context- awareness. Research report no. GIT-GVU-99-32, College of Computing: Georgia Institute of Technology.
14. Edwards, J.S. & Kidd, J.B. (2003). Bridging the gap from the general to the specific by linking knowledge management to business processes. In V. Hlupic (Ed.), Knowledge and business process management (pp. 118-136). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
15. Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1), 63-93.
16. Eppler, M.J. (2003). Managing information quality: Increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive products and processes. Berlin: Springer.
17. Ferstl, O.K. & Sinz, E.J. (1994). From business process modeling to the specification of distributed business application systems: An object-oriented approach. Research report. Dept. of Business Information Systems, University of Bamberg.
18. Frank, U. (2002). Multi-perspective enterprise modeling (MEMO): Conceptual framework and modeling languages. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35). Honolulu, Hawaii.
19. Goesmann, T. & Herrmann, T. (2001). Wissensmanagement und Geschäftsprozessunterstützung - am Beispiel des Workflow Memory Information System WoMIS. In T. Herrmann, A.-W. Scheer, & H. Weber (Eds.), Verbesserung von Geschäftsprozessen mit Flexiblen Workflow-Management- Systemen 4 (pp. 83-101). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
20. Gronau, N. (2003). Modellierung von Wissensintensiven Geschäftsprozessen mit Der Beschreibungssprache k-Modeler. In N. Gronau (Ed.), Wissensmanagement: Potenziale - Konzepte - Werkzeuge. In Proceedings of the Fourth Oldenburg Conference on Knowledge Management, Berlin.
21. Hädrich, T., Maier, R. (2004). Modeling knowledge work. In P. Chamoni et al. (Eds.), Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI 2004), Teilkonferenz Knowledge Supply and Information Logistics in Enterprises and Networked Organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 189-203). Berlin.
22. Heisig, P. (2002). GPO-WM: Methoden und Werkzeuge Zum Geschäftsprozess-Orientierten Wissensmanagement. In A. Abecker, K. Hinkelmann, & M. Heiko (Eds.), Geschäftsprozessorientiertes Wissensmanagement (pp. 47-64). Berlin: Springer.
23. Henrich, A. & Morgenroth, K. (2002). Integration von Kontextunterstütztem Information Retrieval in Portalsysteme. Paper presented at the Teilkonferenz Management der Mitarbeiter-Expertise in IT-Beratungsunternehmen, MKWI 2002, Nürnberg, Germany.
24. Henrich, A. & Morgenroth, K. (2003). Supporting collaborative software development by context-aware information retrieval facilities. In Proceedings of the DEXA 2003 Workshop on Web Based Collaboration (WBC 2003), Prague, Czech Republic.
25. Junginger, S., Kühn, H., Strobl, R., & Karagiannis, D. (2000). Ein Geschäft-Sprozessmanagement-Werkzeug der Nächsten Generation - ADONIS: Konzeption und Anwendungen. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 42(5), 392-401.
26. Karagiannis, D. & Woitsch, R. (2003). The PROMOTE approach: Modelling knowledge management processes to describe knowledge management systems. In Proceedings of the Fourth Oldenburg Conference on Knowledge Management. Berlin: Gito.
27. Klemke, R. (2000). Context framework: An open approach to enhance organisational memory systems with context modeling techniques. Paper presented at the Third Conference on Practical Applications of Knowledge Management (PAKM 2000), Basel, Switzerland.
28. Kuutti, K. (1997). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B.A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Maier, R. (2004). Knowledge management systems: Information and communication technologies for knowledge management. Berlin: Springer.
30. Maier, R., Hädrich, T., & Peinl, R. (2005). Enterprise knowledge infrastructures. Berlin: Springer.
31. Maier, R. & Remus, U. (2003). Implementing process-oriented knowledge management strategies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 62-74.
32. Maier, R. & Sametinger, J. (2002). Infotop: An information and communication infrastructure for knowledge work. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Knowledge Management, Dublin, Ireland.
33. Mäkelä, E., Hyvönen, E., Saarela, S., & Viljanen, K. (2004). OntoViews: A tool for creating semantic Web portals. In Proceedings of the Third International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), Hiroshima, Japan.
34. Maus, H. (2001). Workflow context as a means for intelligent information support. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2001), Dundee, Scotland.
35. Oestereich, B., Weiss, C., Schröder, C., Weilkiens, T., & Lenhard, A. (2003). Objektorientierte geschäftsprozess-modellierung mit der UML. Heidelberg: dpunkt.
36. Österle, H. (1995). Business engineering. Prozeß- und systementwicklung. Band 1: Entwurfstechniken. Berlin: Springer.
37. Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
38. Priebe, T. (2004). INWISS: Integrative enterprise knowledge portal. Demonstration presented at the Third International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), Hiroshima, Japan.
39. Priebe, T., Kiss, C., & Kolter, J. (2005). Semiautomatische Annotation von Textdokumenten mit Semantischen Metadaten. Paper presented at the Sixth Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2005), Bamberg, Germany.
40. Priebe, T. & Pernul, G. (2003). Towards integrative enterprise knowledge portals. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2003), New Orleans, Louisiana.
41. Priebe, T., Schläger, C., & Pernul, G. (2004). A search engine for RDF metadata. Paper presented at the DEXA 2004 Workshop on Web Semantics (WebS 2004), Zaragoza, Spain.
42. Sachs, P. (1995). Transforming work: Collaboration, learning, and design. Communications of the ACM, 38 (9), 36-44.
43. Schauer, H. (2005). Knowledge MEMO: Eine Methode zur Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle Ganzheitlichen Betrieblichen Wissensmanagements. Doctoral dissertation. Koblenz: University of Koblenz.
44. Scheer, A.-W. (2001). ARIS: Modellierungsmethoden, Metamodelle, Anwendungen. Berlin: Springer.
45. Schultze, U. (2000). A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 3-41.
46. Schultze, U. (2003). On knowledge work. In C.W. Holsapple (Ed.), Handbook on knowledge management, Volume 1: Knowledge matters (pp. 43-58). Berlin: Springer.
47. Spur, G., Mertins, K., & Jochem, R. (1996). Integrated enterprise modelling. Berlin: Beuth.
48. Stojanovic, N., Maedche, A., Staab, S., Studer, R., & Sure, Y. (2001). SEAL: A framework for developing semantic portals. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001), Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
49. Tan, P., Madnick, S.E., & Tan, K.-L. (2004). Context mediation in the semantic Web: Handling OWL ontology and data disparity through context interchange (MIT Sloan working paper no. 4496-04; CISL working paper no. 2004-13).
50. W3C. (2004). OWL Web ontology language overview. Retrieved May 24, 2005, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/
51. W3C. (2004). Resource description framework (RDF): Concepts and abstract syntax. Retrieved May 24, 2005, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts- 20040210/
52. Wege, C. (2002). Portal server technology. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(3), 73-77.