Literary reading activities of good and weak students: A think aloud study

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 35-52

  Janssen, Tanja ^a   Braaksma, Martine ^a   Rijlaarsdam, Gert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Literary understanding; Literature teaching; Reader response; Reading strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645936288     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03173568     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Abdolah, K. (1995). En toen waren wij aan de beurt. De meisjes en de partizanen [And then it was our turn. In The girls and the partisans] (pp. 7-11). Breda: De Geus.
2. Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: Situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 411-428.
3. Alexander, P.A. (2000). Toward a model of academic development: Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Educational Researcher, 3, 28-44.
4. Andringa, E. (1995a). Ontwikkelingen in het omgaan met literaire complexiteit [Developments in dealing with literary complexity]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 20(3), 271-284.
5. Andringa, E. (1995b). Strategieën bij het lezen van literatuur [Literary reading strategies). Spiegel, 13(3), 7-33.
6. Andringa, E. (2000). "The Dialogic Imagination"; Literarische Komplexität und Lesekompetenz. In H. Witte, C. Garbe, K. Holle, et al. (Eds.), Deutschunterricht zwischen Kompetenzerwerb und Persö nlichkeitsbildung (pp. 85-97). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren GmbH.
7. Applebee, A.N. & Purves, A.C. (1992). Literature and the English language arts. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of curriculum research (pp. 726-748). New York: MacMillan.
8. Braaksma, M.A.H., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., & van Hout Wolters, B.H.A.M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 1-37.
9. Breetvelt, I., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1994). Relations between writing processes and text quality: When and how? Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 103-123.
10. Britton, B.K., & Graesser, A.C. (Eds.). (1996). Models of understanding text. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Crain-Thoreson, C., Lippman, M.Z., & McClendon-Magnuson, D. (1997). Windows on comprehension: Reading comprehension processes as revealed by two think-aloud procedures. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 579-591.
13. de Nooyer, M. (1984). De verjaardagskalender. In R.Anker, F.Pijlman, & J. Verhallen (Eds.), Ooitgedacht; Een groot aantal verhalen verzameld in een boek [The birthday calendar. In Never thought; A large number of stories in one book] (pp. 35-37). Zwolle: CPNB.
14. Earthman, E.A. (1992). Creating the virtual work: Readers' processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(4), 351-384.
15. Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Revised edition). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
16. Janssen, T. (1996). Asking for trouble: Teacher questions and assignments in the literature classroom. SPIEL: Siegener Periodicum zur Internationalen Empirischen Literaturwissenschaft, 15(1), 8-23.
17. Janssen, T. (1998). Literatuuronderwijs bij benadering. Een empirisch onderzoek naar de vormgeving en opbrengsten van het literatuuronderwijs Nederlands in de bovenbouw van het havo en vwo [Approaches to literature teaching; A study of the form and results of literary education in Dutch secondary schools]. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
18. Janssen, T. (2002). Instruction in self-questioning as a literary reading strategy: An exploration of empirical research. L1, Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 2(2), 95-120.
19. Kneepkens, E.W.E.M., & Zwaan, R.A. (1994). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 23, 125-138.
20. Kucan, L., & Beck, I.L. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction, and social interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67(3), 271-299.
21. Levi, P. (1987). Het interview. Alle verhalen [The interview. In Collected stories] (pp. 677-678). Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.
22. Nooteboom, C. (1958). Hoela. De verliefde gevangene (Hullay. In The amorous prisoner] (pp. 45-47). Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers.
23. Peskin, J. (1998). Constructing meaning when reading poetry: An expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 16(3), 235-263.
24. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P.P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Smith, M.W. (1991). Constructing meaning from text: An analysis of ninth-grade reader responses. Journal of Educational Research, 84(5), 263-271.
26. van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
27. Vipond, D., & Hunt, R.A. (1984). Point-driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of literary reading. Poetics, 13, 261-277.
28. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V.J. Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Winterson, J. (1998). The three friends. In The world and other places (pp. 47-51). New York: Vintage International.