Average kr schedule in learning of timing: Influence of length for summary knowledge of results and task complexity

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 911-924

  Ishikura, Tadao ^a  

^a DOSHISHA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645823644     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.101.3.911-924     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ANNETT, J. (1959) Feedback and human behavior. Middlesex, Eng.: Penguin.
2. BLANDIN, Y., & PROTEAU, L. (2000) On the cognitive basis of observational learning: development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 846-867.
3. HENRY, F. M. (1968) Specificity vs. generality in learning motor skill. In R. C. Brown & G. S. Kenyon (Eds.), Classical studies on physical activity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Pp. 331-340.
4. MAGILL, R. A. (1989) Motor learning concepts and applications. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
5. MAGILL, R. A. (2001) Augmented feedback in motor skill. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology. New York: Wiley. Pp. 86-114.
6. MCCRACKEN, H. D., & STELMACH, G. E. (1977) A test of the schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 193-201.
7. NEWELL, K. M. (1976) Motor learning without knowledge of results through the development of a response recognition mechanism. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 209-217.
8. NEWELL, K. M., & SHAPIRO, D. C. (1976) Variability of practice and transfer of training: some evidence toward a schema view of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 233-243.
9. SCHMIDT, R. A. (1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
10. SCHMIDT, R. A. (1985) The search for invariance in skilled movement behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 188-200.
11. SCHMIDT, R. A. (1991a) Motor learning and performance: from principles to practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
12. SCHMIDT, R. A. (1991b) Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Pp. 59-75.
13. SCHMIDT, R. A., & LEE, T. D. (1999) Motor control and learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
14. SCHMIDT, R. A., & WHITE, J. L. (1972) Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills: a test of Adams' closed-loop theory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 143-153.
15. SCHMIDT, R. A., & WRISBERG, C. A. (2004) Motor learning and performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
16. SCHMIDT, R. A., YOUNG, D. E., SWINNEN, S., & SHAPIRO, D. C. (1989) Summary knowledge of results for acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
17. WULP, G., & SCHMIDT, R. A. (1996) Average KR degrades parameter learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 371-381.
18. YAO, W., FISCHMAN, M. G., & WANG, Y. T. (1994) Motor skill acquisition and retention as a function of average feedback, summary feedback, and performance variability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 273-282.