Can someone please settle this dispute? Canadian softwood lumber and the dispute settlement mechanisms of the NAFTA and the WTO

World Economy

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 585-610

  Anderson, Greg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT; NAFTA; TRADE AGREEMENT; TRADE RELATIONS; WORLD SYSTEM; WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33645805227     PISSN: 03785920     EISSN: 14679701     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00801.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Anderson, G. (2001), 'Hemispheric Integration in the Post-Seattle Era: The Promise and Problems for the FTAA', International Journal, 56 (Spring), 207-33.
2. Anderson, G. (2003), 'The Compromise of Embedded Liberalism, American Trade Remedy Law, and Canadian Softwood Lumber: Can't We All Just Get Along?', Canadian Foreign Policy, 10 (Winter), 87-108.
3. Anderson, G. (2004), 'The NAFTA at Ten: Still Weathering the Storm', North American Integration Monitor Vol. 2 (2) (Washington, DC: Centre for Strategic and International Studies).
4. Cameron, M.A. and B.W. Tomlin (2000), The Making of the NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
5. Davey, W.J. (1996), Pine & Swine: Canada-United States Trade Dispute Settlement: The FTA Experience and NAFTA Prospects (Ottawa: Centre for Trade Policy and Law).
6. de Araujo Jr., J.T., C. Macario and K. Steinfatt (2001), 'Anti-dumping in the Americas' (Santiago, Chile: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Carribean), 1-33.
7. Gagne, G. (2000), North American Free Trade, Canada, and US Trade Remedies: An Assessment After Ten Years', The World Economy, 23, 1, 77-91.
8. Gagne, G. (2003), 'The Canada-US Softwood Lumber Dispute: A Test Case for the Development of International Trade Rules', International Journal, 58 (Summer), 335-68.
9. Gallaway, M.P., B.A. Blonigen and J.E. Flynn (1999), 'The Welfare Costs of the US Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Laws', Journal of International Economics, 49 (December), 211-44.
10. Hart, M. with B. Dymond and C. Robertson (1994), Decision at Midnight: Inside the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement Negotiations (Vancouver: UBC Press).
11. Howse, R. (1998), 'Settling Trade Remedy Disputes: When the WTO Forum is Better than the NAFTA', C. D. Howe Commentary No. 111 (Toronto: C. D. Howe Institute).
12. Macrory, P. (2003), 'NAFTA Chapter 19: A Successful Experiment in International Dispute Resolution', Commentary No. 168 (Toronto: C. D. Howe Institute).
13. Prusa T.J. and S. Skeath (2001), 'The Economic and Strategic Motives for Anti-dumping Filings', Working Paper 8424 (National Bureau of Economic Research, August).
14. Prusa, T. J. (1999), 'On the Spread and Impact of Anti-dumping', Working Paper 7404 (National Bureau of Economic Research, October).