Welfare costs of the U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws

Journal of International Economics

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 211-244

  Gallaway, Michael P ^a   Blonigen, Bruce A ^b   Flynn, Joseph E ^a  

^a Division of Research and Statistics   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Antidumping; Computable general equilibrium; Countervailing duty; International trade

Indexed keywords

NATIONAL TRADE; TRADE POLICY; WELFARE ECONOMICS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033377212     PISSN: 00221996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00063-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson J. Domino dumping I: Competitive exporters. American Economic Review. 82:1992;65-83.
2. Anderson J. Domino dumping II: Antidumping. Journal of International Economics. 35:1993;133-150.
3. Anderson J., Neary J.P. Trade reform with quotas, partial rent retention, and tariffs. Econometrica. 60:1992;57-76.
4. Armington P.S. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers. 16:1969;159-176.
5. Boltuck R. An economic analysis of dumping. Journal of World Trade Law. 21:1987;45-54.
6. Boltuck, R., Francois, J.F., Kaplan, S., 1991. The economic implications of the administration of the U.S. AD/CVD laws. In: Boltuck, R., Litan, R.E. (Eds.), Down in the Dumps: Administration of the Unfair Trade Laws. The Brookings Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 152-195.
7. Bond, E., 1995. Using tariff indices to evaluate preferential trading arrangements: An application to Chile. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.
8. Brander J., Spencer B. Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics. 18:1985;313-321.
9. Clarida R. Entry, dumping and shakeout. American Economic Review. 83:1993;180-202.
10. Congressional Budget Office, 1994. How the GATT affects U.S. antidumping and countervailing-duty policy. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, D.C.
11. de Melo J., Tarr D. Welfare costs of U.S. quotas in textiles, steel and autos. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 72:1990;489-497.
12. Devarajan S., Rodrik D. Trade liberalization in developing countries: Do imperfect competition and scale economies matter? American Economic Review. 79:1989;283-287.
13. Dinopoulos E., Kreinin M. Effects of the U.S.-Japan auto VER on European prices and U.S. welfare. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 70:1988;484-491.
14. DeVault, J., 1993. Antidumping administrative reviews and import pricing. Working paper, Lafayette College.
15. Ethier W.J. Dumping. Journal of Political Economy. 90:1982;487-506.
16. Feenstra, R.C., 1984. Voluntary export restraints in U.S. autos, 1980-1981: Quality, employment and welfare effects. In: Baldwin, R.E., Krueger, A. (Eds.), The Structure and Evolution of Recent U.S. Trade Policy. University of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 35-65.
17. Finger, J.M. (Ed.), 1993. Antidumping: How it Works and Who Gets Hurt. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
18. Finger, J.M., 1996. Legalized backsliding: Safeguard provisions in GATT. In: Martin, W., Winters, L.A. (Eds.), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Francois J.F., Arce H.M., Reinert K.A., Flynn J.E. Commercial policy and the domestic carrying trade. Canadian Journal of Economics. 29:1996;181-197.
20. International Trade Administration, 1994. The Annual Report on the Status of Antidumping/Countervailing Duty Programs, FY93 and FY 94. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
21. Kokoski M.F., Smith V.K. A general equilibrium analysis of partial-equilibrium welfare measures: The case of climate change. American Economic Review. 77:1987;331-341.
22. Martin, W., Winters, L.A. (Eds.), 1996. The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Messerlin P.A., Reed G. Antidumping policies in the United States and the European Community. Economic Journal. 105:1995;1565-1575.
24. Morkre, M.E., Kelly, K.H., 1994. Effects of Unfair Imports on Domestic Industries: U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Cases, 1980-88, U.S. Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Economics Staff Report. U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C.
25. Murray T., Rousslang D.J. A method for estimating injury caused by unfair trade practices. International Review of Law and Economics. 9:1989;149-164.
26. Palmeter, N.D., 1991. The antidumping law: A legal and administrative nontariff barrier. In: Boltuck, R., Litan, R.E. (Eds.), Down in the Dumps: Administration of the Unfair Trade Laws. The Brookings Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 64-89.
27. Prusa T.J. Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn? Journal of International Economics. 33:1992;1-20.
28. Reinert, K.A., Roland-Holst, D.W., 1991. Parameter Estimates for U.S. Trade Policy Analysis. Unpublished manuscript, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, D.C.
29. Shin, H.J., 1994. Antidumping Law and Foreign Firm Behavior: An Empirical Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Economics, Yale University.
30. Staiger, R.W., Wolak, F.A., 1994. Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 51-118.
31. Tarr, D., Morkre, M., 1984. The aggregate costs to the United States of tariffs and quotas on imports: General tariff cuts and removal of quotas on automobiles, steel, sugar, and textiles. U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C.
32. U.S. International Trade Commission, 1995a. The economic effects of antidumping and countervailing duty orders and suspension agreements. U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, D.C.
33. U.S. International Trade Commission, 1995b. The economic effects of significant import restraints: First biannual update. U.S. International Trade Commission Publication, Washington, D.C.
34. Venables A.J. Trade and trade policy with imperfect competition: The case of identical products and free entry. Journal of International Economics. 19:1985;1-19.