Technologies in transition, policies in transition: Foresight in the risk society

Technovation

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 413-421

  Webster, Andrew ^a  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; PROCESS ENGINEERING; PUBLIC POLICY; RISK MANAGEMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

INNOVATIONS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 0032686033     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00031-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Balazs, K., 1998. Technology Foresight in Hungary, Mimeo. Technopolis, Brighton.
2. Beck, U., 1991. The Risk Society. Sage, London.
3. Beck, U., 1995. The re-invention of politics. In: Beck, U., Giddens, A., Lash, S. (Eds.), Reflexive Modernisation. Polity Press, Cambridge.
4. Beck, U., 1996. Risk society and the provident state. In: Szersynzki, B. et al. (Eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. Sage, London, pp. 27-43.
5. Beck, U., 1998. Politics of risk society. In: Franklin, J. (Ed.), The Politics of Risk Society. Polity Press, Cambridge.
6. Bell, W., 1996. What do we mean by future studies? In: Slaughter, R. (Ed.), New Thinking for a New Millennium. Routledge, London.
7. Cameron, H. et al., 1996. Technology Foresight: Perspectives for European and International Co-operation. PREST Report, University of Manchester. Commissioned for DGXII, European Commission, Brussels.
8. Collingridge, D., 1984. The Social Control of Technology.
9. Collingridge, D., 1986. When Science Speaks to Power.
10. Department of Health, 1992. Research for Health. NHS Executive, Leeds.
11. Edquist, C. (Ed.), 1997. Systems of Innovation. Pinter, London.
12. Gavigan, J., Cahill, E., 1997. Overview of Recent European and Non-European National Technology Foresight Studies, Technical Report No. TR97/02. European Commission: Joint Research Centre, Seville.
13. Gavigan, J., Cahill, E.A., 1997. Overview of Recent European and non-European National Technology Foresight Studies. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville.
14. Gibbons, M. et al., 1995. The New Production of Knowledge. Sage, London.
15. Giddens, A., 1998. Risk society: the context of British politics. In: Franklin, J. (Ed.), The Politics of Risk Society. Polity Press, Cambridge.
16. Grupp, H., 1994. Technology at the beginning of the 21st century. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 6 (4), 379-411.
17. Hetman, F., Kamata, H., 1996. Introduction: initiatives in futures research at the OECD. STI Review 17, 7-13.
18. Higgs, P., 1998. Risk, governmentality and the reconceptualisation of citizenship. In: Scambler, G., Higgs, P. (Eds.), Modernity, Medicine and Health. Routledge, London, pp. 176-197.
19. Kooiman, J., 1993. Modern Governance. Sage, London.
20. Kuwahara, T., 1996. Technology Foresight in Japan: a new approach in methodology and analysis. STI Review 11, 51-70.
21. de Laat, B., Laredo, P., 1998. Foresight for research and technology policies: from innovation studies to scenario confrontation. In: Coombs, R. et al. (Eds.), Technological Change and Organisation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 150-179.
22. van Lente, H., Rip, A., 1997. The rise of membrane technology. Social Studies of Science 28 (2).
23. Ling, T., 1998. The Madingley Scenarios: Two Scenarios for the Future Context of Healthcare. NHS Confederation, Cambridge.
24. Martin, B., 1995. Foresight in science and technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 7 (2), 139-168.
25. Van Der Meulen, B.J.R., 1996. Heterogeneity and co-ordination: the experience of the Dutch Foresight Committee. STI Review 11, 161-188.
26. Miles, I., 1997. Forsight in social science. Evaluation Report, ESRC, January 1997.
27. OST [Office of Science and Technology], 1993. Realising our Potential. HMSO, London.
28. OST [Office of Science and Technology], 1995. Realising our Potential. HMSO, London.
29. OECD, 1996. Special issue on government technology foresight exercises. STI Review 17(1).
30. POST [Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology], 1997. Science Shaping the Future? Technology Foresight and its Impacts. HMSO, London, June.
31. Rhoades, R.A., 1997. Understanding Governance. Open Univeristy Press, Milton Keynes.
32. Rip, A., 1990. An exercise in foresight: the research system in transition - to what? In: Cozzens, S. et al. (Eds.), The Research System in Transition. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
33. Rip, A., Van Der Meulen, B.J.R., 1996. The postmodern research system. Science and Public Policy 23 (6), 343-352.