Portraying Epistemology: School Science in Historical Context

Science Education

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 64-79

  Rudolph, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037227554     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.1055     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Adb-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
2. Alters, B. J. (1997a). Nature of science: A diversity or uniformity of ideas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1105-1108.
3. Alters, B. J. (1997b). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39-55.
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (1963). The biology teachers' handbook. New York: Wiley.
7. Boyd, R. (1984). The current status of scientific realism. In J. Leplin (Ed.), Scientific realism (pp. 41-82). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8. Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 282-295.
9. Brickhouse, N. W., & Stanley, W. B. (1995a). Response to Good. Science Education, 79, 337-339.
10. Brickhouse, N. W., & Stanley, W. B. (1995b). Science education without foundations: A response to Loving. Science Education, 79, 349-354.
11. Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
12. Cartwright, N. (1999a). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Cartwright, N. (1999b). The limits of exact science, from economics to physics. Perspectives on Science, 7, 318-336.
14. Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2001). Defining "science" in a multicultural world: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85, 50-67.
15. Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society (1945). General education in a free society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Costa, S., Hughes, T. B., & Pinch, T. (1998). Bringing it all back home: Some implications of recent science and technology studies for the classroom science teacher. Research in Science Education, 28, 9-21.
17. Dewey, J. (1909). The purpose and organization of physics teaching in secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 9, 291-292.
18. Dewey, J. (1910a). How we think. New York: D.C. Heath.
19. Dewey, J. (1910b). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31(787), 121-127.
20. Dewey, J. (1916a). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
21. Dewey, J. (1916b). Method in science teaching. General Science Quarterly, 1(1), 3-9.
22. Dewey, J. (1916c). Progress. International Journal of Ethics, 26(3), 311-322.
23. Dewey, J. (1934). The supreme intellectual obligation. Science Education, 18(1), 1-4.
24. Dewey, J. (1945). Method in science teaching. Science Education, 29(3), 119-123.
25. Eflin, J. T., Glennan, S., & Reisch, G. (1999). The nature of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 107-116.
26. Fine, A. (1996a). The natural ontological attitude, the shaky game: Einstein, realism, and the quantum theory (2nd ed., pp. 112-135). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Fine, A. (1996b). Science made up: Constructivist sociology of scientific knowledge. In P. Galison & D. J. Stump (Eds.), The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power (pp. 231-254). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28. Fine, A. (1998). The viewpoint of no-one in particular. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 72, 9-20.
29. Galison, P., & Stump, D. J. (Eds.). (1996). The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.
30. Geiger, R. L. (1992). Science, universities, and national defense, 1945-1970. Osiris, 2nd. series, 7, 26-48.
31. Geiger, R. L. (1997). What happened after Sputnik? Shaping university research in the United States. Minerva, 35, 349-367.
32. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Good, R. (1995). Comments on multicultural science education. Science Education, 79, 335-336.
34. Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural: Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
35. Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83, 775-796.
36. Hollinger, D. A. (1990). Free enterprise and free inquiry: The emergence of laissez-faire communitarianism in the ideology of science in the United States. New Literary History, 21, 897-919.
37. Jenkins, E. W. (1992). School science education: Towards a reconstruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24, 229-246.
38. Jenkins, E. W. (1994). Public understanding of science and science education for action. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 601-611.
39. Jenkins, E. W. (1996). The "nature of science" as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 137-150.
40. Jones, K. M. (1982). The government-science complex. In R. H. Bremner & G. W. Reichard (Eds.), Reshaping America: Society and institutions, 1945-1960 (pp. 315-342). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
41. Kawagley, A. O., Norris-Tull, D., & Norris-Tull, R. A. (1998). The indigenous worldview of Yupiaq culture: Its scientific nature and relevance to the practice and teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 133-144.
42. Kevles, D. J. (1990). Cold war and hot physics: Science, security, and the American state, 1945-1956. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 20, 239-264.
43. Kevles, D. J. (1992). K1S2: Korea, science, and the state. In P. Galison & B. Hevly (Eds.), Big science: The growth of large-scale research (pp. 312-333). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44. Kleinman, D. L. (1995). Politics on the endless frontier: Postwar research policy in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
45. Kleinman, D. L. (1998). Untangling context: Understanding a university laboratory in the commercial world. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23, 285-314.
46. Kliebard, H. M. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958 (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
47. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310.
49. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conception of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
51. Lederman, N. G. (1995). Suchting on the nature of scientific thought: Are we anchoring curricula in quicksand? Science and Education, 4, 371-377.
52. Lewis, B. F., & Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Introduction: Shifting from universalism to cross-culturalism. Science Education, 85, 3-5.
53. Longbottom, J. E., & Butler, P. H. (1999). Why teach science? Setting rational goals for science education. Science Education, 83, 473-492.
54. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
55. McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science and Education, 7, 511-532.
56. McGinn, M. K., & Roth, W.-M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 14-24.
57. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
58. National Science Foundation (1963). Annual report for fiscal year 1963 (Vol. 13). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
59. Norris, S. P. (1995). Learning to live with scientific expertise: Toward a theory of intellectual communalism for guiding science teaching. Science Education, 79, 201-217.
60. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. Price, D. K. (1965). The scientific estate. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Purcell, E. A. (1973). The crisis of democratic theory: Scientific naturalism and the problem of value. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
63. Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
64. Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Scientists in the classroom: The cold war reconstruction of American science education. New York: Palgrave/St. Martin's Press.
65. Ryan, A. (1995). John Dewey and the high tide of American liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
66. Schwab, J. J. (1958). The teaching of science as inquiry. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 14, 374-379.
67. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In P. F. Brandwein (Ed.), The teaching of science (pp. 3-103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. Schwab, J. J. (1964). The structure of the natural sciences. In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 31-49). Chicago: Rand McNally.
69. Shapin, S. (1990). Science and the public. In R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R. Christie, & M. J. S. Hodge (Eds.), Companion to the history of modern science (pp. 990-1007). New York: Routledge.
70. Shapin, S. (1999). Rarely pure and never simple: Talking about truth. Configurations, 7, 1-14.
71. Shook, J. R. (2000). Dewey's empirical theory of knowledge and reality. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
72. Smith, M. U., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., McComas, W. F., & Clough, M. P. (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1101-1103.
73. Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers. Science Education, 83, 493-509.
74. Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2001). Discovering indigenous Science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85, 6-34.
75. Solomon, J. (1999). Meta-scientific criticisms, curriculum innovation and the propagation of scientific culture. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 1-15.
76. Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 78, 387-398.
77. Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Teaching sciences: The multicultural questions revisited. Science Education, 85, 35-49.
78. Suchting, W. A. (1995). The nature of scientific thought. Science and Education, 4, 1-22.
79. Suchting, W. A. (1996). More on the nature of scientific thought: Responses to professors Lederman and Ohlsson. Science and Education, 5, 381-390.
80. Toumey, C. (1996). Conjuring science: Scientific symbols and cultural meanings in American life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
81. Turner, S., & Sullenger, K. (1999). Kuhn in the classroom, Lakatos in the lab: Science educators confront the nature-of-science debate. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 24, 5-30.
82. Weinberg, A. M. (1966). Can technology replace social engineering? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 22(12), 4-8.
83. Westbrook, R. B. (1991). John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
84. Westbury, I., & Wilkof, N. J. (Eds.), (1978). Joseph J. Schwab: Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85. Westhoff, L. M. (1995). The popularization of knowledge: John Dewey on experts and American democracy. History of Education Quarterly, 35, 27-47.