Impact of CEDIT recommendations: An example of health technology assessment in a hospital network

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 161-168

  Bodeau Livinec, Florence ^a,c   Simon, Emmanuelle ^a,d   Montagnier Petrissans, Catherine ^a   Joël, Marie Eve ^b   Féry Lemonnier, Elisabeth ^a  

^a ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d SAINT LOUIS HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

France; Health policy; Health technology assessment; Hospital; Impact study

Indexed keywords

FRANCE; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; IMPACT STUDY;

HOSPITALS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PUBLIC POLICY; SURVEYING;

HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATOR; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

DECISION MAKING; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FRANCE; HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION; HUMANS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 33645774158     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462306050975     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brorsson B, Arvidsson S. The effect of dissemination of recommendations on use. Preoperative routines in Sweden, 1989-91. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:547-552.
2. Cuzin B, Kirkorian G, Maisonneuve H. Cardiac pacemakers. When clinical evaluation lags behind technological progress. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:910-923.
3. Dixon S, Coleman P, Nicholl J, et al. Evaluation of the impact of a technology appraisal process in England: The South and West Development and Evaluation Committee. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8:18-24.
4. Dobbins M, Cockerill R, Barnsley J. Factors affecting the utilization of systematic reviews. A study of public health decision makers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17:203-214.
5. Durand-Zaleski I, Jolly D. Technology assessment in health care-decision makers and health care providers: What they need to know. Health Policy. 1990;15:37-44.
6. Féry-Lemonnier E. L'évaluation des technologies médicales. ADSP. 2002;39:28-33.
7. Féry-Lemonnier E. Neuf voies de succès pour une bonne introduction des innovations médicales. RVH. 2003;493:25-31.
8. Garcia-Altes A, Ondategui-Parra S, Neumann PJ. Cross-national comparison of technology assessment processes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:300-310.
9. Glikman J, Pazart L, Casadebaig F, et al. Assessing the impact of a consensus conference on long-term therapy for schizophrenia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:251-259.
10. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317-1322.
11. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225-1230.
12. Hailey D, Corabian P, Harstall C, Schneider W. The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:651-656.
13. Hailey D, Menon D. A short history of INAHTA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999;15:236-242.
14. Jacob R, Battista RN. Assessing technology assessment. Early results of the Quebec experience. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993;9:564-572.
15. Jacob R, McGregor M. Assessing the impact of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:68-80.
16. Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, et al. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306-1311.
17. Milne R, Clegg A, Stevens A. HTA responses and the classic HTA report. J Public Health Med. 2003;25:102-106.
18. Mowatt G, Bower DJ, Brebner JA, et al. When and how to assess fast-changing technologies: A comparative study of medical applications of four generic technologies. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1:i-vi, 1-149.
19. Oliver A, Mossialos E, Robinson R. Health technology assessment and its influence on health-care priority setting. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:1-10.
20. Orvain J, Xerri B, Matillon Y. Overview of health technology assessment in France. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:25-34.
21. Thomson R, Lavender M, Madhok R. How to ensure that guidelines are effective. BMJ. 1995;311:237-242.
22. Vermeulen V, Coppens K, Kesteloot K. Impact of health technology assessment on preventive screening in Belgium: Case studies of mammography in breast cancer, PSA screening in prostate cancer, and ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17:316-328.
23. Wathen B, Dean T. An evaluation of the impact of NICE guidance on GP prescribing. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:103-107.