HTA responses and the classic HTA report

Journal of Public Health Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 102-106

  Milne, Ruairidh ^a   Clegg, Andrew ^a   Stevens, Andrew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness; Decision making; Methodology; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH POLICY; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW LITERATURE; STATE MEDICINE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 0037665065     PISSN: 09574832     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg023     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Stevens A, Milne R, Burls A, Health technology assessment: history and demand. J Pub Hlth Med 2003; 25: 98-101.
2. Padkin A, Rowan K, Black N. Using high quality clinical databases to complement the results of randomised controlled trials: the case of recombinant human activated protein C. Br Med J 2001; 323: 923-926.
3. Lewsey JD, Leyland AH, Murray GD, Boddy FA. Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials. Hlth Technol Assessment 2000; 4(22).
4. Clarke M, Chalmers I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: islands in search of continents? JAMA 1998; 280: 280-282.
5. Mulrow CD, Cook DJ, Davidoff F. Systematic reviews: critical links in the great chain of evidence. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126(5): 389-391.
6. The Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane.org/(27 May 2002, date last accessed).
7. HTA programme support for the work of NICE. http://www.ncchta.org/nice/nice.htm (27 May 2002, date last accessed).
8. Gabbay J, Kerridge L, Milne R, Stein K. The NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment programme. In: Baker MR, Kirk S, eds. Research and development for the NHS: evidence, evaluation and effectiveness. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2001: 141-162.
9. National Horizon Scanning Centre. http://www.publichealth.bham.ac.uk/horizon/ (27 May 2002, date last accessed).
10. National Prescribing Centre. http://www.npc.co.uk/ (27 May 2002, date last accessed).
11. Parkes J, Bryant J, Milne R. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators: arrhythmias. A rapid and Systematic review. Hlth Technol Assessment 2000; 4(26).
12. McDonagh MS, Bachmann LM, Golder S, Kleijnen J, ter Riet G. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in the medical management of unstable angina. Hlth Technol Assessment 2000; 4(30).
13. O'Meara S, Riemsma R, Shirran L, Mather L, ter Riet G. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of orlistat in the management of obesity. Hlth Technol Assessment 2001; 5(18).
14. Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users' guides to patient care. JAMA 2000; 284(10): 1290-1296.
15. Gray JAM. Evidence-based health care. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1997.
16. Liberati A, Sheldon TA, Banta HD. EUR-ASSESS project subgroup report on methodology. Methodological guidance for the conduct of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Hlth Care 1997; 13(2): 186-219.
17. Gray A, Raikou M, McGuire A, et al. Cost effectiveness of an intensive blood glucose control policy in patients with type 2 diabetes: economic analysis alongside randomised controlled trial (UKPDS 41). Br Med J 2000; 320: 1373-1378.
18. What is the STEER Service? http://www.wihrd.soton.ac.uk/projx/signpost/whatis.htm (27 May 2002, date last accessed).
19. Alphabetical list of titles of Cochrane Reviews appearing in the latest issue of The Cochrane Library. http://www.update-software.com/abstracts/titlelist.htm (27 May 2002, date last accessed).