Overview of health technology assessment in France

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 25-34

  Orvain, Jacques ^a   Xerri, Bertrand ^a   Matillon, Yves ^a  

^a ANAES   (France)

Author keywords

Clinical practice guidelines; French health care system; Health technology assessment; Public health

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; PATIENT MONITORING; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; PUBLIC POLICY;

FRANCE; HEALTH PROFESSIONALS; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (HTA);

HEALTH CARE;

ACCREDITATION; CENTRALIZATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DEVICE; FRANCE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

EID: 2442687885     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462304000753     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. ANAES. L'ostéoporose chez les femmes ménopausées et chez les sujets traités par corticoïdes: méthodes diagnostiques et indications. ANAES, Paris, Apr. 2001.
2. Cuzin B, Kirkorian G, Maisonneuve H. Cardiac pacemakers: When clinical evaluation lags behind technological progress. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:910-923.
3. Durand-Zaleski I, Jolly D. High technology in health care. Qual Assur Health Care. 1990;2:321-327.
4. Durieux P, Viens-Bitker C, Jolly D, Blum-Boisgard C. Examples of the influence of evaluation on health policy. Health Policy. 1988;9:325-330.
5. ECHTA/ECAHI Report. December 2001.
6. Eisinger F, Alby N, Bremond A, et al. INSERM-FNCLCC collective expertise. Recommendations for medical management of women with genetic risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer. Ann Génét. 1999;42:51-64.
7. Espallargues M, Estrada MD, Sola M, Sampietro-Colom L, et al. Guide for the appropriate indications of bone densitometry to predict risk fractures, Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment. Jun. 1999.
8. Fleurette F, Banta D. Health technology assessment in France. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:400-411.
9. Gindre I, Maisonneuve H, Riche B, Durocher A. Good clinical practice guidelines in the hospital. Current status in 207 public and private hospitals in 1999. Presse Méd. 2000;29: 1807-1812.
10. Glikman J, Pazart F, Casadebaig A, et al. Assessing the impact of a consensus conference on long-term therapy of schizophrenia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:251-259.
11. INSERM. Ostéoporose: stratégies de prévention et de traitement. Expertise collective. Feb. 1997.
12. Maguerez G, Erbault M, Terra JL, Maisonneuve HM, Matillon Y. Evaluation of 60 continuous quality improvement projects in French hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001;13:89-97.
13. Maisonneuve H, Ménard J. The Juppé plan. Lancet. 1997;349: 792-793.
14. Maisonneuve H, Cordier H, Durocher A, Matillon Y. The French clinical guidelines and medical references program: Development of 48 clinical guidelines for private practice over a period of 18 months. J Eval Clin Pract. 1997;3:3-13.
15. Matillon Y, Durieux P. L'évaluation médicale: du concept à la pratique. Paris: Sciences Flammarion; 2000.
16. Moquet MJ, Loirat P, Matillon Y. Rapid assessment of medical and surgical procedures in France. In: ISTAHC proceedings, Berlin, June 2002, p. 146.
17. National Institutes of Health. Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. NIH Consens Statement. 2000, March 27-29;17(1):1-36.
18. Olsen O, Gotzche PC, Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet. 2001;358:1340-1342.
19. Pazart L, Carpentier F, Durocher A, et al. Impact of the consensus conference on polycythemia vera: An opportunity to change or a sign of change? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999;15:602-607.
20. Pazart LH, Massol J, Matillon Y. Including practice data to improve evidence-based guidelines. Example of guidelines on the management of thyroid nodules. J Eval Clin Pract. 1998;4:317-323.
21. Weill C. Health care technology in France. In: Banta HD, Gelband H, Battista R, Jonsson E, eds. Health care technology and its assessment in eight countries. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1995:103-135.
22. World Health Organization. World Health Report 2000-Health systems: Improving performance, June 2000.
23. Xerri B, Rüther A, Dauben HP. Rapid technology assessment depends on context and definition. In: ISTAHC proceedings, Berlin, June 2002, p. 231.