Influence of polyethylene creep behavior on wear in total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 422-427

  Penmetsa, Janaki R ^a   Laz, Peter J ^a   Petrella, Anthony J ^b   Rullkoetter, Paul J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^b JOHNSON AND JOHNSON   (United States)

Author keywords

Creep; Penetration; Polyethylene wear; THA; Wear simulation

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ARTICLE; FEMUR HEAD; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GAIT; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; HARDNESS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT INSTABILITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMUR HEAD; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GAIT; HARDNESS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSTEOLYSIS; POLYETHYLENE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 33645734626     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20042     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Harris WH. 1995. The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop 311:46-53.
2. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA. 2002. A review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:649-661.
3. Kadoya Y, Revell PA, Kobayashi A, et al. 1997. Wear particulate species and bone loss in failed total joint arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 340:118-129.
4. Dowd JE, Sychterz CJ, Young AM, et al. 2000. Characterization of long-term femoral-head-penetration rates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1102-1107.
5. Ramamurti B, Estok DM, Bragdon CR, et al. 1999. Dimensional changes in metal-backed polyethylene acetabular cups under cyclic loading. Trans ORS 24:822.
6. Isaac GH, Dowson D, Wroblewski BM. 1996. An investigation into the origins of time-dependent variation in penetration rates with Charnley acetabular cups-wear, creep or degradation. Proc Inst Mech Eng[H] 210:209-216.
7. Charnley J, Halley DK. 1975. Rate of wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 112:170-179.
8. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Dowson D, et al. 1996. Prospective clinical and joint simulator studies of a new total hip arthroplasty using alumina ceramic heads and cross-linked polyethylene cups. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:280-285.
9. Devane PA, Horne JG. 1999. Assessment of polyethylene wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 369:59-72.
10. Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ, Johnston TL, et al. 2001. Comparison of femoral head penetration rates between cementless acetabular components with 22-mm and 28-mm heads. J Arthroplasty 16: 111-115.
11. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA, Yang A, et al. 1999. Analysis of temporal wear patterns of porous-coated acetabular components: distinguishing between true wear and so-called bedding-in. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:821-830.
12. Bevill S, Bevill G, Penmetsa J, et al. 2005. Finite element simulation of early creep and wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech 38:2364-2375.
13. Maxian TA, Brown TD, Pedersen DR, et al. 1996. 3-Dimensional sliding/ contact computational simulation of total hip wear. Clin Orthop 333:41-50.
14. Maxian TA, Brown TD, Pedersen DR, et al. 1996. Adaptive finite element modeling of long-term polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 14:668-675.
15. Archard JF. 1953. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Physiol 24:981-988.
16. Maxian TA, Brown TD, Pedersen DR, et al. 1997. Finite element analysis of acetabular wear. Validation, and backing and fixation effects. Clin Orthop 344:111-117.
17. Teoh SH, Chan VM, Thampuran R. 2002. An elastoplastic finite element model for polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech 35:323-330.
18. Maxian TA, Brown TD, Pedersen DR, et al. 1996. A sliding distance-coupled finite element formulation for polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech 29:687-692.
19. Rimnac C, Klein B, Burstein A, et al. 1994. In vitro chemical and mechanical degradation of UHMWPE: one year results. Trans ORS 119.
20. Lee KY, Pienkowski D. 1998. Compressive creep characteristics of extruded ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res 39:261-265.
21. Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Davy DW, et al. 1994. Comparison of hip force calculations and measurements in the same patient. J Arthroplasty 9:45-51.
22. Estok DM, Bragdon CR, Plank GR, et al. 2000. Measurement of creep in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE): comparison of conventional UHMWPE vs. a highly cross-linked polyethylene. Trans ORS 25:550.
23. Eggli S, z'Brun S, Gerber C, et al. 2002. Comparison of polyethylene wear with femoral heads of 22 mm and 32 mm. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:447-451.
24. Lee KY, Pienkowski D. 1998. Viscoelastic recovery of creep-deformed ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). ASTM Special Technical Publication 1307:30-36.