Implementing the logic model for measuring the value of faculty affairs activities

Academic Medicine

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 280-285

  Otto, Ann K ^a   Novielli, Karen ^b   Morahan, Page S ^c,d  

^a NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Elam Program   (United States)

^d DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; LOGIC; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; TEACHER; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DECISION MAKING; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL;

EID: 33645734134     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00021     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Whitcomb ME. The medical school's faculty is its most important asset. Acad Med. 2003;78:117-18.
2. Waldman JD, Kelly F, Arora S, Smith HL. The shocking costs of turnover in health care. Health Care Manage Rev. 2004;29(1):2-7.
3. Wingard DL, Garman KA, Reznik V. Facilitating faculty success: outcomes and cost benefit of the UCSD National Center of Leadership in Academic Medicine. Acad Med. 2004;79 (10 suppl):S9-S11.
4. Grigsby RK. Why do faculty development? 16 December 2004. Personal communication; response on AAMC Faculty Affairs Listserv.
5. Apted J. Why do faculty development? 16 December 2004. Personal communication; response on AAMC Faculty Affairs Listserv.
6. Hemp P. Presenteeism: At Work - But Out of It. Harv Bus Rev. 2004;82(10):49-58.
7. Wenger DCK. Conducting a cost-benefit analysis of faculty development programs: its time has come. Acad Phys Sci. 2003;1(May/June):5-7.
8. Thibault GE, Neill JM, Lowenstein DH. The Academy at Harvard Medical School: nurturing teaching and stimulating innovation. Acad Med. 2003;78:673-81.
9. Aron DC, Aucott JN, Papp KK. Teaching awards and reduced departmental longevity: kiss of death or kiss goodbye. What happens to excellent clinical teachers in a research intensive medical school? Med Educ Online. 2000;5(3).
10. Bland CJ, Bergquist B. The vitality of senior faculty members. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. 1997;7(7).
11. Cooke M, Irby DM, Debas HT. The UCSF Academy of Medical Educators. Acad Med. 2003;78:666-72.
12. Morahan PS, Gold JS, Bickel J. Status of faculty affairs and faculty development offices in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 2002;77:398-401.
13. Gruppen LD, Frohna AZ, Anderson RM, Lowe KD. Faculty development for educational leadership and scholarship. Acad Med. 2003;78:137-41.
14. Nieman LZ, Donoghue GD, Ross LL, Morahan PS. Implementing a comprehensive approach to managing faculty roles, rewards, and development in an era of change. Acad Med. 1997;72:496-504.
15. Seymour D. Once Upon a Campus: Lessons for Improving Quality and Productivity in Higher Education. Phoenix: Onyx Press, 1995.
16. Kaplan RS, Norton D. The Balanced Scorecard: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
17. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Logic Model for Program Evaluation 〈http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf〉. Accessed 9 December 2005. W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI.
18. D'Alessandri RM, Albertsen P, Atkinson BF, et al. Measuring contributions to the clinical mission of medical schools and teaching hospitals. Acad Med. 2000;75:1231-37.
19. West Engelkemeyer S. Resources for Managing Our Institutions in These Turbulent Times. Change. 2004;53(January/February):56.
20. Becher BE, Huselid MA, Ulrich D. The HR Scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School, 2001.
21. Stewart AC, Carpenter-Hubin J. The balanced scorecard: beyond reports and rankings. Plan Higher Educ. 2000(Winter):37-42.
22. Kaplan RS, Norton D. Creating the Strategy Focused Organization. The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Boston: Harvard Business School, 2001.
23. Carpenter-Hubin J, Hornsby EE. Making Measurement Meaningful. Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, 2003.
24. Shapiro LT, Nunez WJ. Strategic planning synergy. Plan Higher Educ. 2001;30:27-34.
25. Massy WF. Honoring The Trust - Quality and Cost Containment in Higher Education. Bolton: Anker, 2003.
26. Rimar S, Morahan PS, Richman RC. The balanced scorecard: strategy and performance for academic health centers. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Forum on Emerging Issues, 2000.
27. Inamdar SN, Kaplan RS, Jones MLH, Menitoff R. The balanced scorecard: a strategic management system for multi-sector collaboration and strategy implementation. Qual Manage Health Care. 2000;8:21-39.
28. Jones ML, Filip SJ. Implementation and outcomes of a balanced scorecard model in women's services in an academic health care institution. Qual Manag Health Care. 2000;8:40-51.
29. Rimar S, Garstka SJ. The "Balanced Scorecard": development and implementation in an academic clinical department. Acad Med. 1999;74:114-22.
30. Rimar S. Strategic planning and the balanced scorecard for faculty practice plans. Acad Med. 2000;75:1186-88.
31. United Way of America. Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach.: Supported by Grants from Ewing Marion Kauffman and W. K. Kellogg Foundations, 1996.
32. Norcini J, Burdick W, Morahan P. The FAIMER Institute: creating international networks of medical educators. Med Teach. 2005;27:214-18
33. Butterfield B. Measuring human resources contributions in higher education is crucial for organizational success 〈http://www.cupahr.org/ newsroom/news_archive.asp〉. CUPA-HR News Online. November, 2005;32 (11).
34. Doyle LL. Why do faculty development? 2004. Personal communication; response on AAMC Faculty Affairs Listserv.