A Socio-Legal Approach to Administrative Justice

Law and Policy

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 323-352

  Adler, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645708383     PISSN: 02658240     EISSN: 14679930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0265-8240.2003.00153.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Adler, Michael, and Paul Henman (2001) “e-Justice: A Comparative Study of Computerisation and Procedural Justice in Social Security,” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 15(2):195–212.
2. Adler, Michael, and Paul Henman (forthcoming) The Computerisation of Social Security In Thirteen OECD Countries. London: IBM.
3. Adler, Michael, and Brian Longhurst (1994) Discourse, Power and Justice: Towards a New Sociology of Imprisonment. London: Routledge.
4. Adler, Michael, and Roy Sainsbury (1990) Putting the Whole Person Concept into Practice: Final Report (Parts I and II). Edinburgh: Department of Social Policy, Univ. of Edinburgh.
5. Adler, Michael, and Roy Sainsbury (1991a) “Administrative Justice, Quality of Service and the Operational Strategy.” In The Social Implications of the Operational Strategy, edited by M. Adler & R. Williams. Edinburgh: Dept. of Social Policy and Social Work, Univ. of Edinburgh.
6. Adler, Michael, and Roy Sainsbury (1991b) “The Social Shaping of Information Technology: Computerisation and the Administration of Social Security.” In The Sociology of Social Security, edited by M. Adler, C. Bell, J. Clasen & A. Sinfield. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
7. Adler, Michael, and Roy Sainsbury (1996) “Alternative Approaches to the Computerisation of Social Security: Reflections on a Delphi Exercise.” In Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health, edited by M. Adler & E. Ziglio. London: Jessica Kingsley.
8. Baldwin, John, Nick Wikeley, and Richard Young (1992) Judging Social Security: The Adjudication of Claims for Benefit in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Bauer, P. T. (1981) Equality, The Third World, and Economic Delusion. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
10. Bayles, Michael (1990) Procedural Justice: Allocating to Individuals. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publications.
11. Black, Donald J. (1975) Behavior and the Law. New York: Academic Press.
12. Boyer, Barry (1984) “From Discretionary to Bureaucratic Justice,” Michigan Law Review 82: 971–80.
13. Clarke, John, and Janet Newman (1997) The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage.
14. Duxbury, Neil (1999) Random Justice: On Lotteries and Legal Decision-Making. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
15. Economic and Social Research Council (ERSC) (1994) Review of Socio-Legal Studies: Final Report. Swindon: ESRC.
16. Elster, Jon (1992) Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
17. Fuller, Lon L. (1978) “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication,” Harvard Law Review 92: 353–409.
18. Gallie, W. B. (1964) “Essentially Contested Concepts.” In Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, by W. B. Gallie. London: Chatto & Windus.
19. Galligan, D. J. (1996) Due Process and Fair Procedures: A Study of Administrative Procedures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Great Britain (1991) The Citizen's Charter: Raising the Standard. Cm. 1599. London: HMSO.
21. Great Britain. Council on Tribunals (1993) Annual Report of the Council on Tribunals for the Period. London: HMSO.
22. Great Britain. Department for Education (1994) Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs. London: HMSO.
23. Great Britain. Department of Health and Social Security (1982) Social Security Operational Strategy: A Framework for the Future. London: DHSS.
24. Great Britain. Parliament (1932) Report of the Donoughmore Committee on Ministers Powers. Cmnd. 4050. London: HMSO.
25. Great Britain. Parliament (1957) Report of the Franks Committee on Tribunals and Inquiries. Cmnd. 218. London: HMSO.
26. Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons (1966) Parliamentary Debates, 5th ser., vol. 734. London: HMSO.
27. Habermas, Jürgen (1992) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trans. by W. Rehg. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28. Halliday, Simon (2000) “The Influence of Judicial Review on Bureaucratic Decision-Making,” Public Law (spring):110–22.
29. Halliday, Simon (2001) “Ideal Conditions of Impact: Some Reflections on the Influence of Judicial Review on Administrative Decision Making.” Paper presented to the Law Program, Research School of the Social Sciences, Australian National University, 5 September, Canberra.
30. Halliday, Simon (2003) Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law. Oxford: Hart.
31. Harlow, Carol, and Richard Rawlings (1997) Law and Administration. 2d ed. London: Butterworths.
32. Harris, Neville (1997) Special Educational Needs and Access to Justice: The Role of the Special Educational Needs Tribunal. Bristol: Jordans.
33. Himsworth, Chris (ed.) (1985) Judicial Teeth for Local Ombudsmen? Edinburgh: Department of Public Law, University of Edinburgh.
34. Hirschman, Albert O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
35. Hood, Christopher (1991) “A New Public Management for all Seasons,” Public Administration 69: 3–19.
36. Hood, Christopher (1998) The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
37. Hood, Christopher, Colin Scott, Oliver James, George Jones, and Tony Travers (1999) Regulation inside Government: Waste Watchers, Quality Police, and Sleaze-Busters. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
38. Ison, T. G. (1999) “‘Administrative Justice’: Is it Such a Good Idea?” In Administrative Justice in the 21st Century, edited by M. Harris & M. Partington. Oxford: Hart.
39. Johnson, Norman (ed.) (1995) Private Markets in Health and Welfare: An International Perspective. Oxford: Berg.
40. Le Grand, Julian (1991) “Quasi-Markets and Social Policy,” Economic Journal 101: 1256–67.
41. Le Grand, Julian, and Will Bartlett (eds.) (1993) Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
42. Lipsky, Michael (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
43. MacCormick, Neil (1994) “Four Quadrants of Jurisprudence.” In Prescriptive Formality and Normative Rationality in Modern Systems: Festschrift for R. S. Summers, edited by W. Krawietz, G. H. Von Wright & D. N. MacCormick. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt.
44. Maranville, Deborah (1984) “Review of J. L. Mashaw: Bureaucratic Justice,” Minnesota Law Review 69: 325–47.
45. Mashaw, Jerry L. (1974) “The Management Side of Due Process: Some Theoretical and Litigation Notes on the Assurance of Accuracy, Fairness and Timeliness in the Adjudication of Social Welfare Claims,” Cornell Law Review 59: 772–824.
46. Mashaw, Jerry L. (1983) Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.
47. Miller, David (1976) Social Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
48. Mullan, D. J. (1975) “Fairness: The New Natural Justice,” University of Toronto Law Journal 25: 281–316.
49. Mullen, Tom, Kathy Pick, and Tony Prosser (1996) Judicial Review in Scotland. Chichester: J. Wiley.
50. Nozick, Robert (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
51. Page, Alan (1999) “The Citizen's Charter and Administrative Justice.” In Administrative Justice in the 21st Century, edited by M. Harris & M. Partington. Oxford: Hart.
52. Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
53. Richardson, Genevra, and Maurice Sunkin (1996) “Judicial Review: Questions of Impact,” Public Law (spring):79–103.
54. Riddell, Sheila, Michael Adler, Enid Mordaunt, and Nadia Farmakopoulou (2000) “Special Educational Needs and Competing Policy Frameworks in England and Scotland,” Journal of Education Policy 15(6):621–35.
55. Riddell, Sheila, Alastair Wilson, Michael Adler, and Enid Mordaunt (2002) “Parents, Professionals and Special Educational Needs Policy Frameworks in England and Scotland,” Policy and Politics 30(3):411–25.
56. Rothstein, Bo (1999) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
57. Sainsbury, Roy (1992) “Administrative Justice: Discretion and Procedure in Social Security Decision-Making.” In The Uses of Discretion, edited by K. Hawkins. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
58. Scottish Office Education and Industry Department (1998) A Manual of Good Practice in Special Educational Needs. Edinburgh: HMSO.
59. Selznick, Philip (1980) Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.
60. Sen, Amartya (1985) “The Moral Standing of the Market.” In Ethics and Economics, edited by E. F. Paul, J. Paul & F. D. Miller, Jr. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
61. Seneviratne, Mary (2002) Ombudsmen: Public Services and Administrative Justice. London: Butterworths LexisNexis.
62. Walzer, Michael (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.