Split-plot regression models with both design and spectroscopic variables

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 521-531

  Måge, Ingrid ^a,b,c   Næs, Tormod ^a,d  

^a NORWEGIAN FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c CARGILL INC   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Experimental design; Fish feed; NIR; Process modelling; Raw materials; REML; Split plot

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; FISH; INFRARED DEVICES; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

DESIGN VARIABLES; END-PRODUCTS; FISH FEED; MAIN OBJECTS; NIR; PROCESS-MODELS; REGRESSION MODELLING; RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; SPECTROSCOPIC MEASUREMENTS; SPLIT-PLOT;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33645689683     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.959     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Jørgensen K, Næs T. A design and analysis strategy for situations with uncontrolled raw material variation. J. Chemometrics 2004; 18(2): 45-52.
2. Jørgensen K, Segtnan V, Thyholt K, Næs T. A comparison of methods for analysing regression models with both spectral and designed variables. J. chemometrics 2004; 18(10): 451-464.
3. Henriksen HC, Næs T, Rødbotten R, Aastveit A. Simultaneous modelling of process variables and raw material properties as measured by NIR. A case study from cellulose production. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst 2005; 77: 238-246.
4. Hau I, Box G. Constrained experimental designs. part I: Construction of projection designs. Technical Report 53, Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement University of Winsconsin, 1990.
5. Hau I, Box G. Constrained experimental designs. part II: Analysis of projection designs. Technical Report 54, Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement Univer-sity of Winsconsin, 1990.
6. Måge I, Næs T. Split-plot design for mixture experiments with process variables: a comparison of design strategies. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst 2005; 78: 81-95.
7. Box G, Hau I. Experimental designs when there are one or more factor constraints. J. Appl. Stat 2001; 28(8): 973-989.
8. Patterson HD, Thompson R. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrica 1971; 58: 545-554.
9. Harville DA. Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. J. Am. Stat. Assoc 1977; 72: 320-340.
10. Næs T, Aastveit AH, Sahni NS. Analysis of split-plot designs: an overview and comparison of methods. submitted.
11. Kowalski SM, Cornell JA, Vining GG. Split-plot designs and estimation methods for mixture experiments with process variables. Technometrics 2002; 44(1): 72-79.
12. Bjerke F, Næs T, Ellekjær MR. An application of projection design in product development. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst 2000; 51: 23-36.
13. Cornell JA. Analyzing data from mixture experiments containing process variables: a split-plot approach. J. Quality Tech 1988; 20(1): 2-23.
14. Martens H, Næs T. Multivariate Calibration. Wiley, 1989. Chichester, UK.
15. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001. New York, USA.
16. Martens H, Nielsen JP, Engelsen SB. Light scattering and light absorbance separated by extended multiplicative signal correction. Application to near-infrared transmission analysis of powder mixtures. Anal. Chem 2003; 75(3): 394-404.
17. Martens H. EMSC Toolbox for MATLAB. http://www.models.kvl.dk/source/ EMSCtoolbox/, 2003.